Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+CB\s+and\s+10\s+meter\s+amps\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+CB\s+and\s+10\s+meter\s+amps\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] CB and 10 meter amps (score: 1): Author: K6KWQ@aol.com (K6KWQ@aol.com); Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 21:08:22 EDT; Is it any more illegal to build someone an 11 meter amp, then to build amps that are capable of running a lot more then the legal limit? I know as legal hams we would never run these amps past the le; /archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00296.html (6,925 bytes)
2. [Amps] CB and 10 meter amps (score: 1): Author: w5lu@hotmail.com (S. J. Blackwell); Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 01:47:24 +0000; I have had a problem with the type accepting, ban possible use by CBers tack that the gov took some years ago when they took the 11M band from the hams. A ham should be able to make the amp work pro; /archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00299.html (7,456 bytes)
3. [Amps] CB and 10 meter amps (score: 1): Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz); Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 07:44:50 -0700; /archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00306.html (7,752 bytes)
4. [Amps] CB and 10 meter amps (score: 1): Author: w8ron@stratos.net (Ron); Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 01:05:49 -0400; I agree completely. I always object to those hams that think that everything they do is fine and any one less than them is a problem. I came from the CB band 20 years ago so I guess I am a CBer too.; /archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00307.html (8,329 bytes)
5. [Amps] CB and 10 meter amps (score: 1): Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz); Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 09:27:32 -0700; /archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00308.html (9,600 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]