Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Glitch\s+resistors\s+\-\-\s+replacing\s+RF\s+choke\s+in\s+SB\-220\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Glitch\s+resistors\s+\-\-\s+replacing\s+RF\s+choke\s+in\s+SB\-220\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Glitch resistors -- replacing RF choke in SB-220 (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2002 09:37:02 -0400; Thanks all for the valuable comments. A somewhat related question. A few years ago I bought a glitch resistor, from a person no longer on this reflector, who said I should substitute it for the small; /archives//html/Amps/2002-09/msg00002.html (7,307 bytes)
2. [Amps] Glitch resistors -- replacing RF choke in SB-220 (score: 1): Author: W4EF@dellroy.com (Michael Tope); Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 10:01:41 -0700; That would make sense that it would fail on the lowest band, Pete. On 80M, the main choke has the least reactance, and likewise the shunt bypass C between the two chokes has the most reactance. The e; /archives//html/Amps/2002-09/msg00005.html (8,458 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]