Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+HV\s+ripple\s+voltage\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+HV\s+ripple\s+voltage\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] HV ripple voltage (score: 1): Author: Paul Decker <kg7hf@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 03:25:15 +0000 (UTC); Hey amp builders, As a general rule, what would be considered "good" regulation and good ripple of an HV power supply? If the no load voltage for a 3cx800A7 amplifier's power supply is 2500 V, while; /archives//html/Amps/2009-11/msg00115.html (7,448 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] HV ripple voltage (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 22:49:20 -0500; Its better than a SB-220 and about the same as many other amps. A 10% regulation is considered the benchmark but its seldom met when pricing competition is stiff. On SSB with a 30% duty cycle (no pro; /archives//html/Amps/2009-11/msg00116.html (8,260 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] HV ripple voltage (score: 1): Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 23:10:16 -0500; If building I prefer better, but that's about the kind of regulation on most of my amps. It's an area of rapidly diminishing returns. More iron, more copper, more capacity, and lots more money for an; /archives//html/Amps/2009-11/msg00117.html (8,545 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]