Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Here\'s\s+a\s+Shocker\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Here\'s\s+a\s+Shocker\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Here's a Shocker (score: 1): Author: "Harold B. Mandel" <ka1xo@juno.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 16:21:15 -0500; Dear Friends, Check out the "Current Combinator" used in medical diathermy: < HTTP://www.albany.net/~zardoz/wap.html > Hal Mandel _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amp; /archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00188.html (6,775 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Here's a Shocker (score: 1): Author: Will Matney <craxd1@ezwv.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 16:38:38 -0500; Hal, I think that is the same as an electric cautery (to burn and seal off bleeding, cauterization or electrodiathermy). It's an old one by the looks of the insulation on the windings. I had some sur; /archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00190.html (8,036 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Here's a Shocker (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>; Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 07:39:54 -0800; _________________________________________________________ I suspect the current was actually pretty high if it actually burned your flesh. You didn't feel it because the frequency was too high. Years; /archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00198.html (8,018 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] Here's a Shocker (score: 1): Author: Dennis12Amplify@aol.com; Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 13:58:31 EST; Which makes me wonder if it wouldn't be good to have our AC power lines run at about 1000 Hz or so. No more shocks, no more accidental electrocutions. The worst that could happen would be a burn. Som; /archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00216.html (7,833 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] Here's a Shocker (score: 1): Author: John Lawson <jpl15@panix.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 14:24:32 -0500 (EST); Usually I try to snip replies - but all this is relevant: On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 Dennis12Amplify@aol.com wrote: In a message dated 11/13/04 9:40:48 AM Central Standard Time, dezrat1242@ispwest.com write; /archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00219.html (10,234 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] Here's a Shocker (score: 1): Author: Will Matney <craxd1@ezwv.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 14:50:54 -0500; Isn't the natural frequency for nervous system about 40 Hz? I remember talking to a guy who was investigating the use of electromagnets to help with healing, and if I remember correctly, he said it w; /archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00220.html (12,197 bytes)
7. Re: [Amps] Here's a Shocker (score: 1): Author: John Lawson <jpl15@panix.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 15:09:23 -0500 (EST); On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Will Matney wrote: Isn't the natural frequency for nervous system about 40 Hz? I remember talking to a guy who was investigating the use of electromagnets to help with healing, a; /archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00221.html (9,415 bytes)
8. Re: [Amps] Here's a Shocker (score: 1): Author: Bill Fuqua <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>; Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 14:51:32 -0500; Maybe when the FCC allows higher conductive signals for BPL they can eliminate the annoying 60Hz power line current and we can power everything in our homes by rectifying the RF. 73 Bill wa4lav At 02; /archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00222.html (11,353 bytes)
9. Re: [Amps] Here's a Shocker (score: 1): Author: Dennis12Amplify@aol.com; Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 15:56:34 EST; * I didn't know that I was that uneducated in that area. * I taught circuit analysis using Boylestad at Morton College. * I held a 1st class FCC license until I received a 'grandfathered' General. *; /archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00223.html (10,808 bytes)
10. Re: [Amps] Here's a Shocker (score: 1): Author: John Lawson <jpl15@panix.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 16:19:46 -0500 (EST); Dennis - check how things are quoted - I wasn't responding to anything you wrote. On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 Dennis12Amplify@aol.com wrote: In a message dated 11/15/04 2:13:55 PM Central Standard Time, wlfu; /archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00224.html (9,883 bytes)
11. Re: [Amps] Here's a Shocker (score: 1): Author: Will Matney <craxd1@ezwv.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 17:35:53 -0500; All the electric motors, less the DC motors, would have to be changed out to ones which would run at the higher frequency. That would be one way to lower the unemployment rates..hi hi....... One woul; /archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00227.html (10,832 bytes)
12. Re: [Amps] Here's a Shocker (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 17:49:02 -0800; _________________________________________________________ Sorry, but there is indeed, at least in the humans who volunteered for my testing. (I'm using the word "testing" pretty loosely, here. Mostly; /archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00229.html (9,350 bytes)
13. Re: [Amps] Here's a Shocker (score: 1): Author: Dennis12Amplify@aol.com; Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 00:33:50 EST; ** I it looked to me as if I was also quoted in your response; my error I guess... What I responded to was this: Unless you're participating under two seperate accounts... ? **Only a single account.; /archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00231.html (10,582 bytes)
14. Re: [Amps] Here's a Shocker (score: 1): Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 18:35:41 -0800; Seems to me that it is very important here to properly distinguish between the level of nervous system response (ouch factor) and the level of tissue damage or bio-function disruption (R.I.P. factor); /archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00232.html (11,054 bytes)
15. Re: [Amps] Here's a Shocker (score: 1): Author: Will Matney <craxd1@ezwv.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 01:05:11 -0500; Mike, The way it was explained to me, nerve transmissions run at a certain frequency and it was a low one. When I had the EMG a while back, they insert a needle deep into a muscle, close to the nerve; /archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00233.html (13,219 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]