- 1. [Amps] choke the question (score: 1)
- Author: Charles Harpole <k4vud@hotmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 03:37:34 +0000
- Is it possible to choke this line of discussion? Charles Harpole k4vud@hotmail.com _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/ma
- /archives//html/Amps/2010-07/msg00339.html (11,171 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Amps] choke the question (score: 1)
- Author: donroden@hiwaay.net
- Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:34:57 -0500
- I love this Forum !! *IF* you knew the parasitic frequency, ( 150mhz mentioned for a pair of 3-500s) Couldn't you make to make a fairly broadband neutralization circuit ? Feed 150mhz into the input (
- /archives//html/Amps/2010-07/msg00341.html (10,333 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Amps] choke the question (score: 1)
- Author: Alek Petkovic <vk6apk@bigpond.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:32:34 +0800
- Yeah but then what would we do for fun? Alek. VK6APK http://www.qrz.com/db/vk6apk http://www.qrz.com/db/vk6ap _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com htt
- /archives//html/Amps/2010-07/msg00343.html (12,108 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Amps] choke the question (score: 1)
- Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 07:27:35 -0400
- Youre getting close Don. Neutralization is part of the issue with some tubes but with others the parasitic frequency can be found with little fuss. Its been published for many tubes. Cant dawdle, hea
- /archives//html/Amps/2010-07/msg00346.html (11,658 bytes)
- 5. Re: [Amps] choke the question (score: 1)
- Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:48:59 -0700
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: That could no doubt be made to work, but it sounds more complex than current methods. If you feel like experimenting, it would be worth a try. 73, Bill W6WRT ________________
- /archives//html/Amps/2010-07/msg00352.html (10,488 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu