Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] choke the question

To: Charles Harpole <k4vud@hotmail.com>,<dezrat1242@yahoo.com>, <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] choke the question
From: Alek Petkovic <vk6apk@bigpond.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:32:34 +0800
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Yeah but then what would we do for fun?

Alek. VK6APK

At 11:37 AM 30/07/2010, Charles Harpole wrote:

>Is it possible to choke this line of discussion?
>
>Charles Harpole k4vud@hotmail.com
>
>
>
> > From: dezrat1242@yahoo.com
> > To: amps@contesting.com
> > Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:29:25 -0700
> > Subject: Re: [Amps] No parasitic choke question
> >
> > ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
> >
> > On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:17:06 -0700, Jim Barber <audioguy@charter.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >I was thinking (perhaps in error) that if the parasitic network was
> > >right at the cathode connection it might be more effective in the case
> > >where there was imperfect shielding between the goesinna and goesoutta.
> > >(quite often the practical case)
> >
> > REPLY:
> >
> > You can't just move the same parasitic suppressor from the anode to
> > the cathode. It is designed for a relatively high impedance circuit
> > whereas your cathode is relatively low. There are a number of ways to
> > accomplish suppression in the cathode area. Check the archives for the
> > last week or so on the subject.
> >
> > 73, Bill W6WRT
> > _______________________________________________
> > Amps mailing list
> > Amps@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>_______________________________________________
>Amps mailing list
>Amps@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps


http://www.qrz.com/db/vk6apk
http://www.qrz.com/db/vk6ap


_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>