Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+one\s+mor\s+SB\-220\s+fix\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+one\s+mor\s+SB\-220\s+fix\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] one mor SB-220 fix (score: 1): Author: "kingwood" <k5jv@kingwoodcable.com>; Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 18:40:12 -0500; Greetings to all, There is one other fix that should be really considered on the SB-220 that does not get much mention. The recent thread should be taken seriously. The subject is the RF choke across; /archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00394.html (8,245 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] one mor SB-220 fix (score: 1): Author: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 23:00:41 -0500; The choke at the output side of the amp is there primarily to prevent the tank circuit capacitors from charging up to some DC level and arcing over. The output tuning capacitor typically only has pla; /archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00404.html (11,047 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] one mor SB-220 fix (score: 1): Author: "kingwood" <k5jv@kingwoodcable.com>; Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 08:55:34 -0500; Gary, What you say about the RF choke reducing arcing is correct, but this is just one of its several functions. Your point about C1 arcing is a valid point. But, what if, as you say, it was set near; /archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00407.html (7,953 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]