Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ toroid: 989 ] [ tank: 6174 ] [ coil: 5661 ]

Total 215 documents matching your query.

181. [Amps] Swan Mark 1 on 160 meters (score: 21)
Author: Bill Smith via Amps <amps@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 14:24:40 +0000 (UTC)
Considering adding 160 meters to my Swan Mark 1 amplifier.  The power supply and RF deck were overhauled in 2003.   At that time a new transformer was also added to replace the shorted out original o
/archives//html/Amps/2021-06/msg00015.html (7,256 bytes)

182. Re: [Amps] PI-L Thoughts! (score: 21)
Author: "Ulf (SM0NOR)" <ulf@sm0nor.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 08:45:09 +0100
Thank you all for your insights in this matter. It seem like my original thought to tweak the Q is not very good. The two dominating suggestions are: 1, add a smaller C1 to the existing and switch in
/archives//html/Amps/2010-12/msg00130.html (13,434 bytes)

183. [Amps] construct ferrite "line isolator" (score: 21)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 21:55:50 -0700
A 6 mix iron powder is good for 6-10M, I use it as the L in the input pi Straight from the Micrometals spec sheets and then some testing. There is a huge difference between using it in a SS HF VFO an
/archives//html/Amps/2010-10/msg00397.html (9,933 bytes)

184. Re: [Amps] RF Chokes (score: 21)
Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 07:53:24 -0800
On Jan 31, 2005, at 2:38 AM, Angel Vilaseca wrote: I am building a 3.5 to 30 MHz amp and I have been following this interesting thread. I have a question about the *other* choke in the output circuit
/archives//html/Amps/2005-01/msg00637.html (13,883 bytes)

185. Re: [Amps] RF Chokes (score: 21)
Author: Angel Vilaseca <avilaseca@bluewin.ch>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 11:38:11 +0100
I am building a 3.5 to 30 MHz amp and I have been following this interesting thread. I have a question about the *other* choke in the output circuit, that is the one that is wired between the antenna
/archives//html/Amps/2005-01/msg00634.html (11,815 bytes)

186. [AMPS] Dentron 2000L (score: 21)
Author: ni4l@bellsouth.net (NI4L)
Date: Sat, 05 Dec 1998 23:09:32 -0500
I picked up one of these amps, it only has a 40 meter tank circuit in it. Thinking about Ferrite Toroid Tank Circuit? I know i'll have to wind my own coil- what size wire would be best? It is a good
/archives//html/Amps/1998-12/msg00077.html (6,903 bytes)

187. [AMPS] Re: Autotune amps & the 2uH thingy (score: 21)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com)
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 1998 16:56:19 -0500
That is some great info Marv...gotta save that one to the printer! The ARC-27 was a Collins 200-400MHz airborne TX from the 50-60's era. Select a channel from the remote head and wait a minute while
/archives//html/Amps/1998-10/msg00532.html (12,508 bytes)

188. [AMPS] Re: Autotune amps & the 2uH thingy (score: 21)
Author: wc6w@juno.com (Radio WC6W)
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 1998 14:11:15 EST
a Hi Carl, I found that RG-402 trick just as interesting when I first saw it. I am currently involved in an update of my own ridiculous amplifier and I may just drop one of those coils in for the sak
/archives//html/Amps/1998-10/msg00529.html (11,022 bytes)

189. [AMPS] A "no tune" amplifier output section/operation question. (score: 21)
Author: w4eto@rmii.com (Richard W. Ehrhorn)
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1998 12:24:26 -0600
Hello Skip & all... "No tune" vacuum tube power amplifiers: All the practical ones (i.e., NOT distributed amps with 8++ tubes and efficiency <30%) are really band-pass, not broadband. Most hams have
/archives//html/Amps/1998-04/msg00053.html (12,807 bytes)

190. [AMPS] A "no tune" amplifier output section/operation question. (score: 21)
Author: nospam4me@juno.com (Skip S Isaham)
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 1998 23:31:26 EDT
Hello again, I have a question about the No Tune type of amplifiers that are/were offered for sale to amateurs through the years. Would one of you take a moment to mention the makeup and consideratio
/archives//html/Amps/1998-04/msg00045.html (9,007 bytes)

191. Re: [Amps] Preventing current flow on PEN/EGC (protective earth conductor/equipment grounding conductor). (score: 17)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2024 13:54:27 -0800
There is a copy of the G3SEK article here: https://www.tmchistory.org/tmc_restoration/PAL-500/power and protection for modern tetrodes.pdf 73, Mike W4EF...............................................
/archives//html/Amps/2024-12/msg00002.html (19,566 bytes)

192. Re: [Amps] Preventing current flow on PEN/EGC (protective earth conductor/equipment grounding conductor). (score: 17)
Author: Lukasz <sp4it.mail@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2024 16:23:35 +0100
Hi, It is based on a lm741 op amp (if I remember correctly) steering an N channel mosfet shunt regulator. The reference is two 1% resistors and a multi turn potentiometer (it only moves the voltage b
/archives//html/Amps/2024-12/msg00001.html (19,801 bytes)

193. Re: [Amps] Preventing current flow on PEN/EGC (protective earth conductor/equipment grounding conductor). (score: 17)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2024 13:07:46 -0800
Luk, Are you using the PA0FRI screen regulator circuit? If so, won't you need more than 360 Vdc input? 73, Mike W4EF................. Could someone please verify J chose the voltage correctly, please
/archives//html/Amps/2024-12/msg00000.html (18,180 bytes)

194. Re: [Amps] Preventing current flow on PEN/EGC (protective earth conductor/equipment grounding conductor). (score: 17)
Author: flynth@gmail.com
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2024 12:07:19 +0100
I decided to replace the auto transformer arrangement with a custom wound 230 - 2*130V transformer. Could someone please verify J chose the voltage correctly, please? I need 350V at 45mA max. The shu
/archives//html/Amps/2024-11/msg00059.html (19,181 bytes)

195. Re: [Amps] Preventing current flow on PEN/EGC (protective earth conductor/equipment grounding conductor). (score: 17)
Author: flynth@gmail.com
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2024 11:49:38 +0100
Now that you say it that way I start suspecting the auto transformer. Assuming nothing is miswired (and I have to rewire anyway to route the wires nicely - currently it's only a "working" setup) it i
/archives//html/Amps/2024-11/msg00058.html (17,250 bytes)

196. Re: [Amps] 12 KW CCS ON 160-15M...USING THE 3CX-6000A7... PART 3 (score: 17)
Author: John Lyles <jtml@losalamos.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2023 00:02:48 -0600
Beware that the black epoxied Mica cylindrical capacitors are largely intended for broadcast band use, found in transmitters and antenna tuning units (ATU). They also can work in induction heating ge
/archives//html/Amps/2023-09/msg00012.html (15,363 bytes)

197. [Amps] 12 KW CCS ON 160-15M...USING THE 3CX-6000A7... PART 3 (score: 17)
Author: "jim.thom jim.thom@telus.net" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2023 02:43:31 -0700
Here the manually tuned, tuned input is installed. Typ a pair of 4 section broadcast caps are used for this application...and has been used several times in the past. (17-540 pf per section, and all
/archives//html/Amps/2023-09/msg00002.html (11,215 bytes)

198. Re: [Amps] Pi-L Network Question (score: 17)
Author: Larry Benko <xxw0qe@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 13:29:16 -0600
Jim, On the comparison between a PI and a PI-L network: PI needs to be run at a higher Q than the PI-L for the same stopband attenuation resulting in sharper tuning as you QSY. PI needs 1 fewer poles
/archives//html/Amps/2012-06/msg00252.html (9,692 bytes)

199. Re: [Amps] Pi-L Network Question (score: 17)
Author: Larry Benko <xxw0qe@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 13:09:01 -0600
Jim, I have often wondered this very thing and recently built several filters and have made several measurements. The effects of coupling between the coils are primarily stopband attenuation. Small a
/archives//html/Amps/2012-06/msg00251.html (10,222 bytes)

200. [Amps] Pi-L Network Question (score: 17)
Author: "Jim Garland" <4cx250b@muohio.edu>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 09:56:38 -0600
I've been noodling around various tank circuit possibilities for a 160m monoband amplifier. A pi-L network isn't very practical for an 8877 because the relatively high plate impedance mandates very l
/archives//html/Amps/2012-06/msg00240.html (7,824 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu