Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dave@g3ueg.co.uk: 29 ]

Total 29 documents matching your query.

1. [Antennaware] Shielded loop receive antennas. (score: 1)
Author: David Gould <dave@g3ueg.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 22:02:38 +0000
In the ARRL antenna handbook (and repeated elsewhere) is a design for a 160m shielded rx loop antenna with 5ft square sides. Can anyone advise me how the strength of the recovered signal would change
/archives//html/Antennaware/2006-03/msg00007.html (6,807 bytes)

2. [Antennaware] EZNEC Modelling (score: 1)
Author: David Gould <dave@g3ueg.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:26:55 +0000
I have been doing some basic modelling of vertical antennas using EZNEC for a while but have not paid much attention to the impact the L-match has on the system (particularly losses in the coil) and
/archives//html/Antennaware/2006-11/msg00001.html (7,127 bytes)

3. [Antennaware] EZNEC modelling (score: 1)
Author: David Gould <dave@g3ueg.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 19:27:42 +0000
Thanks for the input so far. Ed K4SB asked how I determine the L-match components.. I use the following website to match what the model gives me to 50ohms. The network I use is the second down on the
/archives//html/Antennaware/2006-11/msg00002.html (7,643 bytes)

4. Re: [Antennaware] EZNEC modelling (score: 1)
Author: David Gould <dave@g3ueg.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 21:34:09 +0000
Terry, Thanks very much for the model and the explanation and taking the time to do it... I see what you have done, in that the capacitor has gone to ground effectively in parallel with the coil. My
/archives//html/Antennaware/2006-11/msg00004.html (9,137 bytes)

5. Re: [Antennaware] 80m antenna for DX (score: 1)
Author: David Gould <dave@g3ueg.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 12:20:46 +0000
Andre, Would you be able to lay a reasonable number of radials? at 15m to 25m length, 60 plus would be good. If so I would suggest a vertical. Its height perhaps depending on what you feel the neighb
/archives//html/Antennaware/2006-12/msg00008.html (8,813 bytes)

6. [Antennaware] Testing the theory.. (score: 1)
Author: David Gould <dave@g3ueg.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 17:05:42 +0100
Following on from the antenna modelling I did a with EZNEC a few months back I am now building the antenna and planning the ground system. I want to do some measurements of the antenna (approx 48ft v
/archives//html/Antennaware/2007-03/msg00007.html (7,090 bytes)

7. [Antennaware] Trapped dipoles (score: 1)
Author: David Gould <dave@g3ueg.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 20:19:36 +0000
I thought that a conventional 80m/40m trap dipole had the trap resonant at 40m, I have now read a number of different fragments of information that say that this is not the best approach and that the
/archives//html/Antennaware/2007-11/msg00000.html (7,117 bytes)

8. [Antennaware] EZNEC model versus reality (score: 1)
Author: David Gould <dave@g3ueg.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 20:22:46 +0000
I have what I think is a significant discrepancy between my model and reality, I would be interested if anyone on the list might be able to offer any insight or explanation. The antenna is a custom T
/archives//html/Antennaware/2009-02/msg00003.html (8,045 bytes)

9. [Antennaware] Voltages along an antenna (score: 1)
Author: David Gould <dave@g3ueg.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 17:36:29 +0000
First thanks to those who helped a few weeks ago with my question about the significant differences between my model and reality for my 62ft vertical on 80m. The concensus was, go with what it is mea
/archives//html/Antennaware/2009-03/msg00003.html (7,661 bytes)

10. [Antennaware] plot comparisons (score: 1)
Author: David Gould <dave@g3ueg.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:33:40 +0000
This question is a long shot, but knowing the resourcefulness of the group I thought I would ask anyway.. I am doing some comparisons of various receive antennas, some of which have very different ga
/archives//html/Antennaware/2009-11/msg00004.html (7,084 bytes)

11. [Antennaware] plot comparisons - addition (score: 1)
Author: David Gould <dave@g3ueg.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:02:35 +0000
I should have added that I am using EZNEC+ V5 73, Dave This question is a long shot, but knowing the resourcefulness of the group I thought I would ask anyway.. I am doing some comparisons of various
/archives//html/Antennaware/2009-11/msg00005.html (7,796 bytes)

12. Re: [Antennaware] plot comparisons (score: 1)
Author: David Gould <dave@g3ueg.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:33:16 +0000
Thanks to all who have replied. I must apologise for the mess I made of asking the question, looking back I did not make myself at all clear, and congratulation to Terry for seeing through the confus
/archives//html/Antennaware/2009-11/msg00008.html (8,353 bytes)

13. [Antennaware] Vertical Dipoles (score: 1)
Author: David Gould <dave@g3ueg.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 17:38:38 +0000
This may be slightly off-topic but hopefully not too much!! I would like to build a vertical dipole for 20m with the bottom about 1m off the ground, to compliment a beam, to give me a quick omni-dire
/archives//html/Antennaware/2009-12/msg00006.html (7,522 bytes)

14. Re: [Antennaware] Vertical Dipoles (score: 1)
Author: David Gould <dave@g3ueg.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 12:12:51 +0000
First, thanks to all who have responded both on and off the reflector, with some very useful information. I would just like to add my reasoning for asking the original question. As well as the RF per
/archives//html/Antennaware/2009-12/msg00012.html (8,164 bytes)

15. [Antennaware] Topband vertical matching. (score: 1)
Author: David Gould <dave@g3ueg.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:14:28 +0100
For the last few years I have just been matching my topband vertical or inverted L antennas by using a 1:4 UNUN I have just seen the following article by Jay at Array Solutions.. http://www.arraysolu
/archives//html/Antennaware/2010-08/msg00001.html (7,905 bytes)

16. Re: [Antennaware] Topband vertical matching. (score: 1)
Author: David Gould <dave@g3ueg.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:46:39 +0100
I would just like to thank all who have replied both on and off the reflector. The discussion has resolved a problem I have had for many years, so I am very grateful for that. I have now done some us
/archives//html/Antennaware/2010-08/msg00007.html (7,938 bytes)

17. [Antennaware] Hybrid tube/wire 18MHz Moxon (score: 1)
Author: David Gould <dave@g3ueg.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:33:41 +0100
I would like to build a Moxon antenna for 18MHz. It will only be used as a temporary antenna. For mechanical reasons I would like to implement the long sides in ali tube, and the short sides with wir
/archives//html/Antennaware/2011-06/msg00000.html (7,553 bytes)

18. [Antennaware] Cushcraft A3S or D3 element model (score: 1)
Author: David Gould <dave@g3ueg.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 14:23:16 +0100
I wonder if anyone has an EZNEC model of the cushcraft element for the D3 dipole or an element of the A3S beam. I would like to investigate a couple of ideas.. I have noticed that the element spacing
/archives//html/Antennaware/2011-09/msg00000.html (6,557 bytes)

19. [Antennaware] 3-element HF yagi design (score: 1)
Author: David Gould <dave@g3ueg.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:55:43 +0000
I would be interested in whether it is possible to design a 3-element HF yagi (with tapered aluminium tubing) that has a frequency independent feed. I am willing to compromise top-notch performance f
/archives//html/Antennaware/2012-01/msg00004.html (7,261 bytes)

20. Re: [Antennaware] 3-element HF yagi design (score: 1)
Author: David Gould <dave@g3ueg.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:50:52 +0000
Guy, Thanks for the information. (I meant NEC-2 not NEC-3, and Yes, I appreciate EZNEC is not an optimiser.) Ok there would be some technical issues to resolve, but the main question still remains -
/archives//html/Antennaware/2012-01/msg00006.html (10,062 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu