Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:oz1axg.nospam@dxmail.dk: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [Antennaware] 160 meter 3/8 wire, steel or copper (score: 1)
Author: "OZ1AXG Flam" <oz1axg.nospam@dxmail.dk>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:21:36 +0200
Hi A question about wire ... I have constructed a 3/8 for 160 meter. I use the tower to support the antenna. It runs 22 meter vertically and then (horisontal for 24,5 meters (i.e. total 46.5 meter).
/archives//html/Antennaware/2008-09/msg00010.html (7,404 bytes)

2. [Antennaware] Fw: 160 meter 3/8 wire, steel or copper (score: 1)
Author: "OZ1AXG Flam" <oz1axg.nospam@dxmail.dk>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 23:26:00 +0200
Hi Terry Thanks a lot for the calculation, and your right, it has been a problem getting it close to 50 ohm with the current wire and ground loss. Very interresting, that the your calulated values is
/archives//html/Antennaware/2008-09/msg00014.html (7,561 bytes)

3. Re: [Antennaware] 160 meter 3/8 wire, steel or copper (score: 1)
Author: "OZ1AXG Flam" <oz1axg.nospam@dxmail.dk>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 23:50:04 +0200
Hi Terry ok, 0.1 db thats not worth it ... especially when i already have 100m Cu 1.5mm lying around ... I hope not to have to change the Cap, since this part of the project is already done, with mec
/archives//html/Antennaware/2008-09/msg00016.html (11,960 bytes)

4. Re: [Antennaware] 160 meter 3/8 wire, steel or copper (score: 1)
Author: "OZ1AXG Flam" <oz1axg.nospam@dxmail.dk>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 00:06:54 +0200
Hi Gary Yes the distance to the tower has influenced the matching a lot ... besides the 22.5 tower theres also two 80 meter sloopers and 1 inverted V 160 meter dipole - altogether making the antenna
/archives//html/Antennaware/2008-09/msg00017.html (12,107 bytes)

5. Re: [Antennaware] 160 meter 3/8 wire, steel or copper (score: 1)
Author: "OZ1AXG Flam" <oz1axg.nospam@dxmail.dk>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 02:28:46 +0200
Hi Terry It would be better to have the antenna at resonans around 1830 (CW portion of the band), rather than 1860 where it is now , but this is where it endend up with the fixed capacitors. So if i
/archives//html/Antennaware/2008-09/msg00019.html (9,675 bytes)

6. Re: [Antennaware] 160 meter 3/8 wire, steel or copper (score: 1)
Author: "OZ1AXG Flam" <oz1axg.nospam@dxmail.dk>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 08:46:23 +0200
Hi Joe Yes, i know, there are many odds againt it beeing a perfect antenna. But that how it is with this super limited space. But what im going for is some vertical radiation, to get some low angale
/archives//html/Antennaware/2008-09/msg00021.html (10,396 bytes)

7. Re: [Antennaware] 160 meter 3/8 wire, steel or copper (score: 1)
Author: "OZ1AXG Flam" <oz1axg.nospam@dxmail.dk>
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 03:11:59 +0200
Hi Just a follow up on the question about replacing the steel wire with copper wire. Today we replaced the steel wire with copper wire. Also, a 100pF in the cap box was replaced with a 150pF adding 5
/archives//html/Antennaware/2008-09/msg00023.html (11,153 bytes)

8. [Antennaware] K9AY Terminated RxLoop wire length (score: 1)
Author: "OZ1AXG Flam" <oz1axg.nospam@dxmail.dk>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 21:21:09 +0200
Hi I put together a Terminated half loop, and it is working very well. Its a simple construction with only one loop (east/west) and a home made control box (no pre-amp, but working on putting one tog
/archives//html/Antennaware/2008-10/msg00004.html (7,478 bytes)

9. Re: [Antennaware] K9AY Terminated RxLoop wire length (score: 1)
Author: "OZ1AXG Flam" <oz1axg.nospam@dxmail.dk>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 23:47:59 +0200
Hi Gary Very interresting, 2 dB is not bad for just 2x2 meter (+15%). When You added wire, did you strictly maintained the upper to lower wire ratio (8:5), in order to maintain the shape ? that would
/archives//html/Antennaware/2008-10/msg00006.html (10,425 bytes)

10. [Antennaware] Two K9AY Rx Loops - with loop center offset (score: 1)
Author: "OZ1AXG Flam" <oz1axg.nospam@dxmail.dk>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 23:43:29 +0100
Hi A question about the K9AY Terminated Rx Loop. Please see this drawing of lot: http://home.cbkn.dk/dx/RxLoop.Map1.GIF RxLoop #1 (east/west) is already constructed (one single loop) and theres no ro
/archives//html/Antennaware/2009-02/msg00000.html (6,992 bytes)

11. Re: [Antennaware] Two K9AY Rx Loops - with loop center offset (score: 1)
Author: "OZ1AXG Flam" <oz1axg.nospam@dxmail.dk>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 22:11:04 +0100
Hi Gary Great ! Thanks for the quick answer Gary.... illl go for configuration #1 - which is best in regards to direction and surounding buildning & structures. -- OZ1AXG Flam -- Original Message --
/archives//html/Antennaware/2009-02/msg00002.html (7,541 bytes)

12. [Antennaware] K9AY RxLoop with 2 turn loop (160m) (score: 1)
Author: "OZ1AXG Flam" <oz1axg.nospam@dxmail.dk>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 15:08:08 +0100
Hi Experts! I read on the internet that adding "turns" to the Loop could improve signal strength ? Question: how much would signal improve adding one extra turn (n=2) versus single loop (n=1) ? The l
/archives//html/Antennaware/2009-11/msg00000.html (6,690 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu