Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:BPARRY@RGV.RR.COM: 171 ]

Total 171 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [CQ-Contest] renewing the 10 meter contest (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Parry" <bparry@rgv.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 09:55:08 -0600
I third that motion. The 10 M contest is fine; you just use a different strategy when the band isn't open much. Sorry for those guys that had no propagation at all. Don't get impatient, I have been t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00185.html (9,060 bytes)

42. Re: [CQ-Contest] Another long DOs and DONTs of QSLing (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Parry" <bparry@rgv.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 06:46:45 -0600
This is a great review for QSLing. It is also reassuring. I have comments about a couple of items. "3. Send via Air Mail. If you know the DX station has postal theft problems, send via Registered Mai
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00059.html (21,380 bytes)

43. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSL cards (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Parry" <bparry@rgv.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 07:29:13 -0600
I have done a lot of experimenting with printing QSL information on my QSL card. I think that most QSL Managers would prefer to have all the info on one side of the card. I can print up to three QSOs
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00211.html (10,713 bytes)

44. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSLs (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Parry" <bparry@rgv.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:11:09 -0600
I had forgotten to mention that I use to little round stamp saying confirmed by W5VX also. I had a hard time finding one of these, but I am sure that someone makes these as a specialty item if you kn
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00227.html (9,539 bytes)

45. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSL (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Parry" <bparry@rgv.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:24:37 -0600
I called before my last submission and was told to follow the procedure Steve gave below. I did it and I had no problem. I think the one area that has been a little complicated is sending in cards fo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00247.html (10,694 bytes)

46. Re: [CQ-Contest] T93J in ARRL test (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Parry" <bparry@rgv.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 17:31:49 -0600
I worked him too about 30 minutes before the contest started. Bill, W5VX Did anyone else copy T93J in the ARRL test or was I hearing things? I thought that Bosnia had transferred over to the E7 prefi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00368.html (8,592 bytes)

47. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer reverse beacon experiment - update (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Parry" <bparry@rgv.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 06:59:04 -0600
Pete, Can this be fed into a regular packet cluster? Bill, W5VX Hi Clive - the spots I'm making available on the Internet are generated by a US$13 (that's right, $13, in kit form) 20M SoftRock SDR ta
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00188.html (12,491 bytes)

48. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer reverse beacon experiment - update (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Parry" <bparry@rgv.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 12:34:14 -0600
I was just thinking that something like this could do away with the self spotting stuff that seems to have everyone in an uproar. Just start up several of these in different areas of the country and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00195.html (16,430 bytes)

49. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer for Propagation Analysis (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Parry" <bparry@rgv.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 07:21:07 -0500
Maybe we could learn something about 160M propagation. Bill W5VX It occurred to me that a possible use of a Skimmer-type application might be for propagation analysis. Given that: a. Skimmer and a wi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00204.html (10,066 bytes)

50. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cheating with Technology (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Parry" <bparry@rgv.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:20:07 -0500
I just don't understand where we are going with this. It appears that folks want to pick the technology that suits them and call it fine. (SO2R, or propagation software, or logging software, or remot
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00300.html (10,707 bytes)

51. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting using remote stations (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Parry" <bparry@rgv.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 14:01:26 -0500
I have always felt like using a remote station was somewhere just outside what I considered fair. I have had the experience of owning a home that was not conducive to having a good antenna or running
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00416.html (14,027 bytes)

52. Re: [CQ-Contest] Move WPX Back to 30 Hours? (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Parry" <bparry@rgv.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 10:09:29 -0500
I agree with this as well. My wife tells me that I don't like change - and she is right! I understand a lot of the arguments that are made for change in my head, but in my heart I wish they had, for
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00558.html (16,449 bytes)

53. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re; Skimmer Ultimate Setup (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Parry" <bparry@rgv.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 08:38:39 -0500
David, I guess that I have heard this argument one to many times. The idea that because there is a microphone or wire attached to my radio, my radio is the same as remote is just a silly extension of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00616.html (13,786 bytes)

54. Re: [CQ-Contest] mystery tool and damaged 40m antennas (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Parry" <bparry@rgv.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 09:16:19 -0500
I bought a couple of gallons of paint at Home Depot the other day and I am pretty sure that this is the tool they gave me to open the paint cans. Bill, W5VX Take a look at the picture of the tool nex
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00097.html (14,514 bytes)

55. Re: [CQ-Contest] [CTDXCC] Heil ProSet Quiet Phone (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Parry" <bparry@rgv.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 10:38:43 -0500
Thanks Dennis, I guess that the RFI problems in these headphones must be pretty common. Since I sent the original e-mail and an e-mail to Bob Heil, I think I have fix....at least one that works for m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00104.html (10,903 bytes)

56. [CQ-Contest] LOTW (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Parry" <bparry@rgv.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 07:52:37 -0500
I was checking my LOTW QSLs today and a thought just crossed my mind. I have just crossed the boundary of 9,000 LOTW QSLs. (I am sure that I am a "piker" compared to many others.) I have 8 file boxes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00178.html (7,569 bytes)

57. Re: [CQ-Contest] OH NO! New Technology!!! (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Parry" <bparry@rgv.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 16:42:30 -0500
I believe that it is a waste of our precious green bandwidth. Bill W5VX <quote n0ax> Special Bulletin - The Rate Sheet Is Changing In the works for a while, the ARRL Contester's Rate Sheet is undergo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00374.html (9,761 bytes)

58. Re: [CQ-Contest] Growing New Contesters with LOTW - suddenly it's 1977again (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Parry" <bparry@rgv.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 10:11:25 -0500
Pete, You are exactly right. It is easy to see that the DXCC desk is hopelessly overwhelmed and it is going to stay that way. We all thought that LOTW was going to save us from these ridiculous waits
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00414.html (14,109 bytes)

59. Re: [CQ-Contest] Growing New Contesters with LOTW - suddenly it's (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Parry" <bparry@rgv.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 09:44:02 -0500
Mike, It is too easy for us to play the "what if this or that" game. I can't speak for Pete, and he and I don't always agree. I do believe that we fundamentally agree on this point. I suggested that
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00439.html (12,406 bytes)

60. Re: [CQ-Contest] New look to rate sheet (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Parry" <bparry@rgv.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 05:52:53 -0500
I didn't get it either, and I get plenty of unwanted HTML e-mails. Bill W5VX Well, it didn't make it here, Dick. I wonder whether that nice HTML content is causing all the spam filters to zap the ema
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00450.html (8,926 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu