Mail Archive Search: <+from:Doug.Grant@analog.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:Doug.Grant@analog.com: 35 ]

Total 35 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] W4AN Remembered (score: 1): Author: "Grant, Doug" <Doug.Grant@analog.com>; Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 10:41:35 -0400; Over the years, Bill and I conversed many times on the phone, in person, by email, IM, and of course on the radio. It was one of those friendships where each conversation simply picked up where the l; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00217.html (8,096 bytes)
2. Nets for Bosnia Traffic? (score: 1): Author: Doug.Grant@analog.com (Doug.Grant@analog.com); Date: Tue Feb 2 16:02:00 1993; A friend of mine has a student from Sarajevo staying with his family. She hasn't heard from her family in 10 months, and recently learned that the Serbs bombed her apartment building. There are appar; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-02/msg00018.html (6,517 bytes)
3. British Novices (score: 1): Author: Doug.Grant@analog.com (Doug.Grant@analog.com); Date: Thu Feb 4 12:32:00 1993; Yup, they're on! The last two years, I've worked one or two on 10 in each SSB DX contest, all with 2E0 prefixes (and A**) suffixes. It isn't the gold mine like 15M JAs or USA Novices - at least not y; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-02/msg00025.html (6,610 bytes)
4. Contest History Made (score: 1): Author: Doug.Grant@analog.com (Doug.Grant@analog.com); Date: Thu Feb 4 18:37:00 1993; I hereby lay claim to a contest "first", unless anyone else can challenge it... The K1DG NAQP SSB log was submitted to (and received by) the contest sponsor all-electronically. The NA ".prn" file was; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-02/msg00027.html (7,351 bytes)
5. E-Mail Contest Logs (score: 1): Author: Doug.Grant@analog.com (Doug.Grant@analog.com); Date: Fri Feb 5 10:32:00 1993; I shoulda known that Trey would have done it before me - at least I (think) I can claim the first NAQP log submitted by E-Mail (or at least the first one sent to KZ2S...). I was asked at a recent YCC; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-02/msg00033.html (7,551 bytes)
6. No subject (score: 1): Author: Doug.Grant@analog.com (Doug.Grant@analog.com); Date: Thu Mar 4 14:43:00 1993; I have both a 930 and a 940. A while ago, N6BV, W1RR, and I tested the receivers for phase noise and spurs, and compared them to a new TS-850 and a vintage TS-830. I think Dean intends to write up th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-03/msg00048.html (7,926 bytes)
7. No subject (score: 1): Author: Doug.Grant@analog.com (Doug.Grant@analog.com); Date: Thu Mar 18 16:43:00 1993; Does anyone out there have a manual for the Alpha 77DX I can borrow? A guy here at work wants to build an amp using a pair of 8877s he scrounged (pretty nice scrounging, eh?), and wants to check out; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-03/msg00235.html (9,049 bytes)
8. No subject (score: 1): Author: Doug.Grant@analog.com (Doug.Grant@analog.com); Date: Fri Mar 19 10:22:00 1993; If such a thing gets put in place, I will enter that category just to make sure that all the whiners have no chance whatever of winning it. I will encourage all the other routine 48-hour Top Ten to e; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-03/msg00244.html (7,973 bytes)
9. No subject (score: 1): Author: Doug.Grant@analog.com (Doug.Grant@analog.com); Date: Fri Mar 19 10:59:00 1993; Somehow the subject field of my messages is getting lost in the Internet maze...the topic of my last message was the 24-hour category, in case it wasn't obvious. Doug K1DG; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-03/msg00246.html (7,057 bytes)
10. No subject (score: 1): Author: Doug.Grant@analog.com (Doug.Grant@analog.com); Date: Fri Mar 19 15:14:00 1993; I had lunch with K1AR today (he was in town to close on the sale of his NH house (no turning back now...). We discussed the half-time debate. If such a category is established, he's thinking of going; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-03/msg00249.html (7,985 bytes)
11. No subject (score: 1): Author: Doug.Grant@analog.com (Doug.Grant@analog.com); Date: Wed Apr 7 11:41:00 1993; It's getting way too complicated. Here's another angle to complicate it more.. Most proponents of part-time contesting can't/won't operate "the full 48". How about the ultimate in time-reduction with; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-04/msg00039.html (7,790 bytes)
12. No subject (score: 1): Author: Doug.Grant@analog.com (Doug.Grant@analog.com); Date: Wed Apr 21 11:01:00 1993; Here's a new potential flame war. Let's try to keep it civil, though. Some contest results recently came in the mail. One station (who shall remain unidentified) won an award. His score qualified him; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-04/msg00126.html (7,863 bytes)
13. No subject (score: 1): Author: Doug.Grant@analog.com (Doug.Grant@analog.com); Date: Wed Apr 21 18:23:00 1993; The responses (both on- and off-reflector) have been interesting. I'll try to summarize at some point after Dayton (where, I'm sure, more gasoline will be thrown on the fire...). However.... I'm not; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-04/msg00134.html (7,295 bytes)
14. No subject (score: 1): Author: Doug.Grant@analog.com (Doug.Grant@analog.com); Date: Tue May 11 17:07:00 1993; This is the right group to ask... Who has the biggest ham antennas? I've recently been asked that question, and I know a bunch of big ones out there, but who's got *THE BIGGEST*? I guess it's really; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-05/msg00074.html (7,439 bytes)
15. No subject (score: 1): Author: Doug.Grant@analog.com (Doug.Grant@analog.com); Date: Thu May 13 16:43:00 1993; The Email system here croaked for most of May 12. If anyone sent me a message regarding BIG ANTENNAS, please try again. I also missed Randy's message about 100W contests. Seems to me that 100W would; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-05/msg00093.html (7,289 bytes)
16. No subject (score: 1): Author: Doug.Grant@analog.com (Doug.Grant@analog.com); Date: Fri May 14 10:31:00 1993; I thought everyone would be interested in this response re big antennas... I'm still collecting inputs - keep 'em coming. So far all the big ones have been domestic (except for TI4CF's 75M array of 4; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-05/msg00097.html (7,829 bytes)
17. No subject (score: 1): Author: Doug.Grant@analog.com (Doug.Grant@analog.com); Date: Fri May 14 13:19:00 1993; I did NOT put WB1HBB up to the message he posted. Honest. I'm curious, though...how many 'little guns' out there on the reflector want the top ops at the top (read:biggest antenna) stations to turn o; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-05/msg00101.html (7,259 bytes)
18. No subject (score: 1): Author: Doug.Grant@analog.com (Doug.Grant@analog.com); Date: Fri May 21 10:42:00 1993; I am in Cheers overload. Here in the Boston TV market, we've been deluged with Cheers interviews, Cheers promos, Cheers ads, and I'VE HAD IT UP TO HERE!!!!! AND IF I HEAR THAT DAMNED SONG AGAIN, SOME; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-05/msg00140.html (7,391 bytes)
19. Low-Pass Filters (score: 1): Author: Doug.Grant@analog.com (Doug.Grant@analog.com); Date: Thu Jul 30 20:05:00 1992; I bought some low pass filters from B&W - the guy who took the order had never heard of them until I gave him the part number and prices from their price list. I tested them on a network analyzer, an; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-07/msg00036.html (6,695 bytes)
20. More on low pass filters (score: 1): Author: Doug.Grant@analog.com (Doug.Grant@analog.com); Date: Fri Jul 31 11:43:00 1992; A hint for you multi-transmitter fans... At K1EA, there was a nagging problem with TS-940s on different bands talking to each other. It was strange - the signal was perfectly tuned in, no matter wher; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-07/msg00040.html (6,825 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]