Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:K9GY@ix.netcom.com: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] 50 Years - WAEDC 2004 (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Hall, K9GY" <K9GY@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 19:12:21 -0000
Mark your calendars now for the 50th Worked All Europe DX Contest 2004 Dates: == CW: August 14/15, 2004 SSB: September 11/12, 2004 RTTY: November 13/14, 2004 http://www.waedc.de CQ WAE 2004! 73, Eric
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00407.html (7,824 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] Packet/No-packet & operating (score: 1)
Author: k9gy@ix.netcom.com (Eric Hall, K9GY)
Date: Mon Jun 2 15:41:01 2003
Hello All: First of all, in regards to the WAE having two types of listings for S/O whether they used packet or not and whether that keeps people from participating. If you chose not to operate this
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00017.html (8,276 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] Antenna improvements vs packet (score: 1)
Author: k9gy@ix.netcom.com (Eric Hall, K9GY)
Date: Mon Jun 2 21:45:34 2003
This sounds like a transmitting antenna problem? NOT a packet problem! And heck it sure sounds like 160m, hah! The solution might be to add more ZF stations on the bands :-) 73, Eric K9GY
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00027.html (6,551 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] Dayton Attendence (score: 1)
Author: k9gy@ix.netcom.com (Eric Hall, K9GY)
Date: Sat Jun 7 18:43:31 2003
Pretty consistent decline of about 2,000 each year... 2003: 22,168 2002: 24,832 2001: 26,151. 2000: 28,804 1993: 33,669 (peak) The Hamvention rate is going down... Maybe it's time to change bands to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00109.html (6,637 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] All Asian CW Contest - this weekend (score: 1)
Author: k9gy@ix.netcom.com (Eric Hall, K9GY)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:01:53 2003
Let's all become RADIO-ACTIVE in the 44th All Asian CW Contest this weekend! And fuel for the packet debate: It's not just a JA contest either! 1S Spratly Is. 3W,XV Vietnam 4J,4K Azerbaijan 4L Georgi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00241.html (8,856 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] "Less Competitively Based" (score: 1)
Author: k9gy@ix.netcom.com (Eric Hall, K9GY)
Date: Tue Jul 1 19:09:17 2003
You know what they say, unless you can run with the bulls you better not step out into the street. Keeping a multi-op station going is no minor task! To say that M/O categories are "less" competitiv
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-07/msg00016.html (6,740 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] S/O is great thread (score: 1)
Author: k9gy@ix.netcom.com (Eric Hall, K9GY)
Date: Thu Jul 3 14:13:49 2003
Gosh Jim will you give up on the single-op/non-packet media blitz. When you remove all the multi stations from your log, then I'll consider not using packet. And in addition, when you (as a single-o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-07/msg00041.html (7,046 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] WAE Country Plaques for 2003 (score: 1)
Author: k9gy@ix.netcom.com (Eric Hall, K9GY)
Date: Thu Jul 24 15:15:06 2003
http://www.darc.de/referate/dx/fedcw.htm
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-07/msg00265.html (7,038 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] NAQP CW - This Saturday! (score: 1)
Author: k9gy@ix.netcom.com (Eric Hall, K9GY)
Date: Mon Jul 28 13:29:50 2003
NAQP CW is this Saturday! http://www.ncjweb.com/naqprules.php or in pdf format http://www.ncjweb.com/naqprules.pdf Let's get some NAQP CW teams together! It does not matter how small or large your sc
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-07/msg00331.html (8,084 bytes)

10. [CQ-Contest] N.A. Off-Time Strategy WAE-CW (score: 1)
Author: K9GY@ix.netcom.com (Eric Hall, K9GY)
Date: Wed Aug 6 15:01:32 2003
Off time strategy in the WAE for S/O is always an interesting adventure. Generally though for Eastern NA stations you will want to maximize the low bands due to the multiplier bonus. That said you wi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00133.html (7,653 bytes)

11. [CQ-Contest] Why make it harder? (score: 1)
Author: k9gy@ix.netcom.com (k9gy@ix.netcom.com)
Date: Wed May 16 20:26:55 2001
I am not sure I can figure out why anyone has to make this process harder than it is? Check out the rating scheme on the WRTC page. That will answer alot of questions! WRTC is only looking at WW, WPX
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00180.html (7,191 bytes)

12. [CQ-Contest] CW WPX M/S ==> changes for serial # (score: 1)
Author: k9gy@ix.netcom.com (k9gy@ix.netcom.com)
Date: Thu May 24 18:28:38 2001
Just saw this today... http://home.woh.rr.com/wpx/multnumbers.htm "Effective for the upcoming CW contest, stations entering in the multi-single category and using a separate station for working multi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00265.html (6,944 bytes)

13. [CQ-Contest] WAE concerns (score: 1)
Author: k9gy@ix.netcom.com (k9gy@ix.netcom.com)
Date: Mon Jun 11 19:41:12 2001
In an attempt to field some of the things raised regarding WAE rules: To clarify, WAE mults are x2 on 40m and x3 on 80m. The total number of available multipliers is always less than (or equal) to th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-06/msg00073.html (7,753 bytes)

14. [CQ-Contest] K4JA - FIVE towers in ONE day! (score: 1)
Author: k9gy@ix.netcom.com (k9gy@ix.netcom.com)
Date: Tue Jun 26 19:11:18 2001
Hi all Not sure if there is a record for the most number of towers put up in one day... -Or- for the most feet of tower put up in one day... -but Paul K4JA put up FIVE (more!) towers today in 90+ F t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-06/msg00229.html (7,133 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu