Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:NQ4I@Contesting.Com: 234 ]

Total 234 documents matching your query.

61. [CQ-Contest] looking for ring rotor (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Dougherty NQ4I" <nq4i@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 18:21:50 -0400
Hi all...this is a little far out...I have 5 of the older ring rotors...I am wanting to turn a 3 el 80m yagi which is approx 30 sq ft and they tell me at TIC Ring that my rings will not hold an anten
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00195.html (6,739 bytes)

62. [CQ-Contest] radio MP vs all (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Dougherty NQ4I" <nq4i@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 09:15:15 -0400
Here is my 2 cents worth....the nq4i m-m station has historically used the MP for the 11 stations...one year we were one MP short...so one member suggested he bring his new MKV...we first put it on 4
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-06/msg00009.html (7,435 bytes)

63. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why did the Canadians (PT5M) beat the Americans(PW5C)in WRTC 2006? (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Dougherty" <nq4i@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 21:39:35 -0400
Hi Jose and excellent analysis...however, there is another factor that needs to be included....VE7ZO is the primary NQ4I M-M op on 40m...nobody knows 40m like Jim...and his productivity during the ni
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-08/msg00304.html (18,724 bytes)

64. [CQ-Contest] zero pointers (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Dougherty" <nq4i@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 11:20:36 -0500
Hi all...New Thread ...at least for the time being....reviewing my log this morning, I find we made nearly 1600 NA qso's...approx 75% were zero pointers from the US...my dilemma should I teach these
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00630.html (7,339 bytes)

65. [CQ-Contest] Partner mode (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Dougherty" <nq4i@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 11:27:20 -0500
Next New Thread.... We used partner mode on 20m and our raw score is up by over 20% from our previous years scores on 20m...we had set up a 3rd computer with audio feeds from both mult and run statio
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00634.html (7,543 bytes)

66. Re: [CQ-Contest] SSB in CW band (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Dougherty" <nq4i@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 12:43:23 -0500
Hi Mal...I don't think for a minute that bullying or rudeness has taken place here...its a matter of necessity and lack of space...lets look at this in a more positive vein... from all appearances it
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00636.html (18,596 bytes)

67. Re: [CQ-Contest] zero pointers (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Dougherty" <nq4i@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 14:42:46 -0500
It is far easier to work from PA0 to DL1 and receive 2 points than it is for a W0 to work a W6 on 80m...whats the logic in the former and not at least give the latter 1 point??? de Rick nq4i ________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00655.html (9,749 bytes)

68. [CQ-Contest] Fw: zero pointers (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Dougherty" <nq4i@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:13:21 -0500
Hi John and all...it is not as much the guy who needs a zone or country mult...its the idiot who makes sure that we get in his log on all 6 bands!!! de Rick -- Original Message -- From: "John Laney"
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00660.html (9,921 bytes)

69. Re: [CQ-Contest] zero pointers (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Dougherty" <nq4i@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:19:16 -0500
Hi Steve...you are possibly reading too much into this interchange...first and foremost you will get credit for your qso...I merely used that tactic to draw attention to what I feel is a great discre
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00663.html (10,064 bytes)

70. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rick's Cafe...NQ4I's "Play it again" (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Dougherty" <nq4i@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:29:53 -0500
Hi Doug...I intend to beat this horse for a long time yet!!! Its not right...I tip my hat to the WPX committee and their farsightedness in allowing US/own country qso's to go for one point...it has m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00666.html (8,776 bytes)

71. [CQ-Contest] new 75 m privileges (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Dougherty" <nq4i@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 05:40:22 -0500
Hi All..does anybody have any information on this proposal? Maybe next week?? I for one am looking forward to the additional phone frequencies on 75m...it will change the dx'ing and contesting on thi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00274.html (6,970 bytes)

72. [CQ-Contest] cq UK (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Dougherty NQ4I" <nq4i@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 09:45:04 -0500
Hi all ...flying the plane to the Luton area of London..get there onfriday...any contestor's in the area want to meet for adult beverages?? de Rick nq4i ______________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00863.html (6,822 bytes)

73. [CQ-Contest] CQ Sydney Australia (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Dougherty" <nq4i@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 16:14:09 -0500
Hi All...taking one our movie actresses back home to VK land and will be in the Hilton Sydney for 6 or 7 days starting 16 Dec thru 22 Dec...any locals want to get together for adult beverages and con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00208.html (6,682 bytes)

74. Re: [CQ-Contest] J7zeroJ Spots (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Dougherty NQ4I" <nq4i@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:37:40 -0500
Hi Guys...the real problem here is the call is not being copied as it is sent! I watched numerous busted calls in arrl cw....all due to poor copying skills! Plain and simple...Copy the Damn call sign
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00359.html (10,573 bytes)

75. [CQ-Contest] logic here? (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Dougherty" <nq4i@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 20:38:38 -0500
Hi all...just listening around on 75 m ssb during the ARRL SSB test and observed the following....US station N2XYZ cqing on a 3820 +- freq and qsx on 3670+- freq...why do this? Why not cq on 3670 and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00024.html (6,528 bytes)

76. Re: [CQ-Contest] logic here? (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Dougherty" <nq4i@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 04:35:39 -0500
observed the following....US station N2XYZ cqing on a 3820 +- freq and qsx on 3670+- freq...why do this? Why not cq on 3670 and listen on that same freq? We now have the privileges for the freq and t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00031.html (9,369 bytes)

77. [CQ-Contest] web page (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Dougherty" <nq4i@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 15:13:29 -0500
Hi All...currently under construction, but the front page is in place...we will be adding something to it daily as it grows and gets better...loook at http:// NQ4I.com de Rick nq4i __________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00648.html (6,328 bytes)

78. [CQ-Contest] DVP for sale (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Dougherty" <nq4i@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 10:06:38 -0400
I have a couple of K1EA DVP's for sale...$65 + $4 shipping to 48 US...also have 4 extra cables 3 Yaesu and 1 Kenwood $20 ea +$4 shipping...de Rick nq4i _______________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-05/msg00108.html (6,349 bytes)

79. [CQ-Contest] web cam (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Dougherty NQ4I" <nq4i@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 22:08:40 -0400
Hi all...we have a web cam operating this weekend and also doing the realtime scoring from nq4i m-m check us out at www.nq4i.com thanks de Rick nq4i _______________________________________________ CQ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-05/msg00240.html (6,258 bytes)

80. [CQ-Contest] technical challenge (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Dougherty NQ4I" <nq4i@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 15:24:23 -0400
Hi all....it has come to my attention that in every sport except Boxing and Ham Radio Contesting.... the score is known and posted for all to see in real time...I challenge the other USA M-M's to pos
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-05/msg00246.html (6,685 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu