Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:Steve: 2016 ]

Total 2016 documents matching your query.

141. Re: [CQ-Contest] Another gratuitous SS-CW trick (score: 1)
Author: "Steve London" <n2ic@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:30:00 -0000
An interesting discussion, with lots of divergent opinions.... Questionable practice: 1) Tuning the bands prior to the contest, and loading up your bandmap. You have, in essence, extended the contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00459.html (11,120 bytes)

142. Re: [CQ-Contest] Another gratuitous SS-CW trick (score: 1)
Author: "Steve London" <n2ic@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:57:12 -0000
So, we're advocating that there should be no rules that can't be detected or enforced ? Hmmm, we better start with the existing Sweepstakes rules. Let's eliminate separate awards for the A, B, and Q
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00462.html (12,060 bytes)

143. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Phone (score: 1)
Author: Steve <steveac@charter.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 09:28:27 -0500
Good move on your part Chuck. I noticed some first-time contesters too. Perhaps 5 or 10 guys who called me and said "I'm not in the contest but wanted to give you a contact, what do you need?" It was
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00574.html (8,623 bytes)

144. Re: [CQ-Contest] Here we go again (score: 1)
Author: Steve Root <steve.root@culligan4water.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 14:30:13 +0000
Pete, I think that it's a great idea for all of us to consider ways to encourage contest activity or make needed improvements. At the same time, we need to be careful about how those changes would af
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00634.html (11,916 bytes)

145. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Intentional QRM (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Steven Williams" <k9gx@thepoint.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 08:57:59 -0000
Hmm, Who could this be? Does he live in Pahrump, NV and do shows about aliens??? A number of my co-workers at Clear Channel are contesters. Maybe on of our Las Vegas guys can stop by W6OBB's place an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00686.html (8,974 bytes)

146. Re: [CQ-Contest] Here we go again (score: 1)
Author: Steve Root <steve.root@culligan4water.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 12:01:34 +0000
That's exactly the point. The KT0R Multi-op effort from MN (currently 4th highest claimed score) made almost 1800 QSO's in Phone SS, and NONE of them were on 10 meters. I don't want to get into a dis
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00687.html (18,274 bytes)

147. Re: [CQ-Contest] Transmitter Problems - CQWW (160m) (score: 1)
Author: Steve Root <steve.root@culligan4water.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 14:12:26 +0000
Roger, I remember hearing you quite a bit over the weekend and you sounded fine to me. On the occasions when I've been accused of having key clicks, I always ask the guy to turn his noise blanker off
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00773.html (9,646 bytes)

148. Re: [CQ-Contest] Chiming in -- SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Steve Root <steve.root@culligan4water.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 21:21:57 +0000
True, but I agree with Ward N0AX that the issue here is recognition. While QST did us a great disservice by curtailing their contest coverage, the Web reporting has allowed vastly improved regional
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00043.html (10,542 bytes)

149. [CQ-Contest] Printed scores (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hanlon <asciibaron@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 21:17:34 -0500
i am very saddened to see the scores drop from QST. 2 years ago when a co-worker was talking up ham radio to me, i had no clue what the scores were - they just appeared to be numbers and callsigns an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00054.html (8,692 bytes)

150. Re: [CQ-Contest] Chiming in -- SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Steve Root <steve.root@culligan4water.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 17:35:02 +0000
by region and class for the ARRL DX Tests, this is certainly a step in the right direction. This is certainly a step in the right direction, however the decision to lump Minnesota and Texas in the s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00089.html (9,412 bytes)

151. Re: [CQ-Contest] Urban noise levels (score: 1)
Author: Steve Root <steve.root@culligan4water.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2004 14:16:09 +0000
Count your blessings! I live in a first ring suburb and my noise levels are considerably higher. 73 Steve K0SR _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00258.html (9,723 bytes)

152. Re: [CQ-Contest] Signing /QRP In Contests (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 21:07:27 -0000
In view of all those disadvantages, I would say'Don't work them if it is too much trouble'. I personally encourage them. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00273.html (11,748 bytes)

153. Re: [CQ-Contest] Signing /QRP In Contests (score: 1)
Author: Steve Root <steve.root@culligan4water.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 13:07:47 +0000
Three things the QRP guys do that aren't good. Sign /QRP: That simply wastes time, and there's no time to waste when the clock is running Unnecessary repeats: Again a waste of time. Don't repeat anyt
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00296.html (15,022 bytes)

154. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL v. contesters (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hanlon <asciibaron@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 19:40:09 -0500
W7TMT wrote: It seems to me that if some folks spent as much time MENTORING entry level Hams as they do BELITTLING them on this reflector there might be enough HF Contest operators around to get the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00354.html (9,592 bytes)

155. Re: Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting tips and tricks - not (score: 1)
Author: Steve Root <steve.root@culligan4water.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 15:52:23 +0000
Probably from me. I usually use didit dit followed by a QRL ? when I'm looking for a hole. Sometimes I get a dit back. It's a lot quicker than QRL? but most guys don't know what it means. I used to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00529.html (10,160 bytes)

156. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ tips and tricks - not (score: 1)
Author: Steve Root <steve.root@culligan4water.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 11:53:03 +0000
This scenario isn't far-fetched. It actually happens a lot if you operate from Behind the Black Hole. That's why a "QRL?" or ditdit-dit is very much appreciated and should be encouraged. 73 Steve K0
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00582.html (10,471 bytes)

157. [CQ-Contest] Re: TS-950SD Rcvr Problems (score: 1)
Author: swedge@hologic.com (Steve Wedge)
Date: Tue Jan 7 13:57:47 2003
Chris: Does the rig go into transmit when this happens? I had something similar happen with my FT-1000, but it went into xmit when there was a very stron local CW signal. I found that the culprit was
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-01/msg00061.html (7,719 bytes)

158. [CQ-Contest] Software (score: 1)
Author: kb6ojs@arrl.net (Steve Silverwood)
Date: Tue Jan 14 11:00:16 2003
FYI, Windows XP has a "compatibility" mode so you can force XP to run in a mode that emulates an earlier version of Windows. To run the program under Windows 98 compatibility mode, first create a sho
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-01/msg00138.html (8,529 bytes)

159. [CQ-Contest] Sprint Dates (score: 1)
Author: k4ma@nc.rr.com (Jim Stevens)
Date: Wed Jan 15 15:54:03 2003
The Jan/Feb issue of NCJ published the 2002 dates for Sprints. Already some confusion has arose, here are the correct dates for the 2003 CW and SSB Sprints. SSB Sprint - 0000Z Feb 2 (Feb 1 local time
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-01/msg00247.html (6,299 bytes)

160. [CQ-Contest] Fw: For Sale-NN4T (score: 1)
Author: nn4t@bellsouth.net (Steve Daniel)
Date: Mon Jan 20 05:48:41 2003
so With has the close fancy.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-01/msg00250.html (7,803 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu