Mail Archive Search: <+from:Tim_Coad@smtp.svl.trw.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:Tim_Coad@smtp.svl.trw.com: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] IC756 vs FT920 (score: 1): Author: Tim_Coad@smtp.svl.trw.com (Tim Coad); Date: Mon Apr 27 14:09:24 1998; I would like to hear from fellow contesters who have actually used both of these radios. Which one do you prefer? What makes one a good/bad contest radio. Please email me direct. Tim - NU6S -- CQ-Con; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-04/msg00360.html (6,395 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Great Condx. (score: 1): Author: Tim_Coad@smtp.svl.trw.com (Tim Coad); Date: Thu May 14 11:37:48 1998; 5/14/98 10:33 AM Last night at 11pm (PDT), 20 Mtrs was wide open to ZL/VK, so on a hunch I went to 15. I was hearing the ZL6 1 watt beacon on 15mtrs. I tuned around and worked a VK4 in the novice ban; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-05/msg00136.html (6,425 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Judicial System Stops Conte (score: 1): Author: Tim_Coad@smtp.svl.trw.com (Tim Coad); Date: Mon Mar 3 13:58:46 1997; "Judicial System Stops Contestor". Well that's my headline. The story is not quite as interesting. I got placed on a jury 7 days before the ARRL SSB contest. "But your honor I have a contest to opera; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-03/msg00033.html (7,220 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] PLEASE WORK ME! (score: 1): Author: Tim_Coad@smtp.svl.trw.com (Tim Coad); Date: Mon Mar 24 13:34:18 1997; Reply to: RE>>[CQ-Contest] PLEASE WORK ME! RE:Poisson d'Avril I am glad to see that there will be QRP activity this year. If you do enter the QRP category don't forget the rule that you must sign /QR; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-03/msg00340.html (9,193 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] HF + six contests (score: 1): Author: Tim_Coad@smtp.svl.trw.com (Tim Coad); Date: Fri May 2 18:11:46 1997; Reply to: HF + six contests I am a big fan of 6 mtrs. I also enjoy HF contests. But modifying an existing HF contest to include 6 mtrs? I dont get it. Is this to sell more HF + 6 rigs......or just an; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-05/msg00023.html (6,448 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] Re: ARRL DX CW and assisted classes (score: 1): Author: Tim_Coad@smtp.svl.trw.com (Tim Coad); Date: Tue Sep 2 17:56:44 1997; NO NO NO......I dont think Jim meant to have that thread started up again. I think he was pointing out that single op assisted is a legitimate competitive category, not that we need to get rid of reg; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-09/msg00023.html (7,104 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] Re: ARRL DX CW and assisted classes (score: 1): Author: Tim_Coad@smtp.svl.trw.com (Tim Coad); Date: Tue Sep 2 17:56:44 1997; NO NO NO......I dont think Jim meant to have that thread started up again. I think he was pointing out that single op assisted is a legitimate competitive category, not that we need to get rid of reg; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-09/msg00289.html (7,100 bytes)
8. [CQ-Contest] Re: ARRL DX CW and assisted classes (score: 1): Author: Tim_Coad@smtp.svl.trw.com (Tim Coad); Date: Tue Sep 2 17:56:44 1997; NO NO NO......I dont think Jim meant to have that thread started up again. I think he was pointing out that single op assisted is a legitimate competitive category, not that we need to get rid of reg; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-09/msg00400.html (7,121 bytes)
9. Rcvd ARRL Cert. yet? (score: 1): Author: Tim Coad" <Tim_Coad@smtp.svl.trw.com (Tim Coad); Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:25 2005; Before I bother Billy, I wanted to ask here if anybody has received their certificates for the 1995 ARRL DX (SSB) contest yet? Tim - NU6S (Please email me direct - of course - Tim_Coad@smtp.svl.trw.c; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00082.html (6,258 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]