- 81. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Beef (score: 1)
- Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 07:02:12 -0800
- Try using a check of "23", Jim. I think I got "CK?" sent to me at least 200 times this past weekend. I guess people were skeptical of a 90 year old ham sending 35 wpm CW. Mike, W4EF..................
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00075.html (8,624 bytes)
- 82. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Beef (score: 1)
- Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 08:49:42 -0800
- Yes, Rex, all the repeat requests are understandable given the unusually low number we were sending. I have thought about using my own personal check "79", but then all of the people with "23" in the
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00095.html (9,021 bytes)
- 83. Re: [CQ-Contest] On Line Logs (score: 1)
- Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 07:38:32 -0800
- against wrong. Mark, et al: If you are confirming a QSO after the contest (and by non-amateur means) with the intent of using that information to alter your log, then I think you are breaking the ru
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00212.html (10,560 bytes)
- 84. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 11, Issue 62 (score: 1)
- Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
- Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2003 16:52:18 -0800
- Did anyone hear how KH7X did in the CW SS? My friend at work claimed he heard him giving out a number in the 1700's on Sunday. I worked him early on (22:41 UTC on Saturday) and he seemed to be doing
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00390.html (19,161 bytes)
- 85. Re: [CQ-Contest] how to cut cast acrylic? (score: 1)
- Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 20:53:11 -0800
- Doug, Laser cutting is best if you want an optical quality edge, but probably not cost effective for this application :):) If you have access to a bandsaw, use a fine pitch blade similar to what you
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00494.html (9,674 bytes)
- 86. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sprint date change - I am NOT HAPPY (score: 1)
- Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:13:14 -0800
- Can I add my two scores together? That way I might have a prayer of beating Scott :):) 73 de Mike, W4EF (aka Lima One Delta) -- kharker@cs.utexas.edu WM5R Club Laptops http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00252.html (10,863 bytes)
- 87. [CQ-Contest] eQSL change of policy (score: 1)
- Author: W4EF@dellroy.com (Mike)
- Date: Tue Apr 9 21:11:36 2002
- Wow, I am really having a hard time fathoming the pathology of someone who would fake a QSL confirmation for 160 and then submit it for award credit. Thats seriously twisted, but I guess it shouldn't
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00107.html (12,166 bytes)
- 88. [CQ-Contest] Re: Money talks (Team U.A. E.) (score: 1)
- Author: W4EF@dellroy.com (Mike)
- Date: Sun Apr 14 13:08:27 2002
- Pete, I thought this was an April Fools joke, but apparently it is not (its dated April 11, 2002): http://www.wrtc2002.org/news18.htm I don't know what all the fuss is about, 2 more good operators co
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00163.html (8,633 bytes)
- 89. [CQ-Contest] Re: [Towertalk] More on Lightning protection (score: 1)
- Author: W4EF@dellroy.com (Michael Tope)
- Date: Wed May 15 14:48:01 2002
- I have heard these sorts of anecdotal accounts (including John's) from time-to-time. I wonder if all the tall towers are somehow increasing the capacitance between the cloud and the ground. Based on
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-05/msg00167.html (9,438 bytes)
- 90. [CQ-Contest] eqsl.cc patents? (score: 1)
- Author: W4EF@dellroy.com (Michael Tope)
- Date: Mon May 20 22:14:26 2002
- My friend has a saying that the best modes of communications are the ones that involve only the two principal parties with no middle men (read HF operation vs FM repeaters). Sounds like this principl
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-05/msg00230.html (8,814 bytes)
- 91. [CQ-Contest] Fw: Life is stranger than fiction (score: 1)
- Author: W4EF@dellroy.com (Michael Tope)
- Date: Thu Jul 4 08:31:42 2002
- Sounds like we need a new category for these folks, Quack? How about SOBN - single operator buck naked? Of course in this category the problems associated with RF in the shack take on a whole new imp
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00044.html (9,905 bytes)
- 92. [CQ-Contest] CW or SSB FCC says neither. (score: 1)
- Author: W4EF@dellroy.com (Michael Tope)
- Date: Fri Jul 19 08:58:36 2002
- This all reminds me of the claims made about Fractal antennas. Lots of articles were written about how "superior" fractal antennas were compared with traditional methods of loading. Oddly enough howe
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00265.html (12,263 bytes)
- 93. [CQ-Contest] Re: QST Line Scores (score: 1)
- Author: W4EF@dellroy.com (Michael Tope)
- Date: Fri Jul 26 08:29:43 2002
- Gary, If you do a "save as" from internet explorer, it will save everything you are looking at. I use this to save Ebay transactions that eventually go away from their website. 73 de Mike, W4EF......
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00450.html (15,900 bytes)
- 94. [CQ-Contest] CQWW and Signal Reports (score: 1)
- Author: W4EF@dellroy.com (Michael Tope)
- Date: Wed Oct 30 10:57:36 2002
- Don't be too sure, Tom. Dunno if it was the same K9 station or not, but I observed the same thing two years ago in the ARRL phone contest. When I mentioned it on the reflector on of the operators of
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-10/msg00247.html (10,335 bytes)
- 95. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Base (score: 1)
- Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
- Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 10:49:40 -0700
- I would guess that what counts is where the antennas are located, but there may not be a rule for this yet. Mike, W4EF.................. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mai
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00352.html (7,813 bytes)
- 96. Re: [CQ-Contest] RES: RES: M/2 Rule (score: 1)
- Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 16:08:01 -0700
- There should be no excuse for that, Kirk. It is very easy to build a PTT lockout that keeps multiple rigs from transmitting simultaneously, provided that the operators stay honest and don't use the "
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-09/msg00226.html (11,513 bytes)
- 97. Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet Cluster Practices (score: 1)
- Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 18:08:36 -0700
- Last monday night/tuesday morning (Sept 27 UTC), I came down to the shack just before midnight and tuned up everything on 160 meters just in case the K7C made an appearance. I then started to tune ar
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00092.html (10,484 bytes)
- 98. [CQ-Contest] MFJ-434 Voice Keyer (score: 1)
- Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 07:06:34 -0700
- Anybody have any experience with the MFJ-434 contest voice keyer? I was thinking of getting one to use in the CQ WW Phone Contest. Thanks, Mike, W4EF................... ______________________________
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00108.html (6,809 bytes)
- 99. [CQ-Contest] Kenwood YK-88C-1 vs Inrad 103 (score: 1)
- Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 00:26:33 -0700
- The 500Hz wide 2nd IF CW filter (YK-88C-1) in W6UE's TS-950SDX is dying (it's intermittent), and I am wondering whether I should replace it with another YK-88C-1 or change it over to the Inrad #103 (
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00293.html (7,107 bytes)
- 100. Re: [CQ-Contest] Kenwood YK-88C-1 vs Inrad 103 (score: 1)
- Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
- Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 03:49:36 -0700
- Thanks to KH6DV, G0XBV, K0XU, K5PI, and K8GU for your replies to my inquiry on the Inrad #103 (400Hz wide x 8.83 IF filter) vs. the Kenwood YK-88C-1 (500Hz wide x 8.83 MHz IF filter). The overall con
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00319.html (8,273 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu