Mail Archive Search: <+from:aa0cy@nwrain.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:aa0cy@nwrain.com: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Name Selction (score: 1): Author: aa0cy@nwrain.com (Bob Wanderer); Date: Sun May 2 11:41:54 1999; Which reminds me when I used to use RENO as my name when I lived in Nevada. Besides the giggles and the "huh?"'s, I'd get some "No, I need the name not the city!" 73, Bob AA0CY/7 PS Wonder what react; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00015.html (7,495 bytes)
2. didit dit (formerly RE: [CQ-Contest] Re: your mail) (score: 1): Author: aa0cy@nwrain.com (Bob Wandenrer); Date: Thu Jul 15 20:55:55 1999; Yes, we should resurrect the didit dit. If memory serves, the proper response (to indicate that yes, indeed, the frequency was occupied) was either a "R" or a "C" with the latter being the more corre; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-07/msg00030.html (8,901 bytes)
3. didit dit (formerly RE: [CQ-Contest] Re: your mail) (score: 1): Author: aa0cy@nwrain.com (Bob Wandenrer); Date: Thu Jul 15 20:55:55 1999; Yes, we should resurrect the didit dit. If memory serves, the proper response (to indicate that yes, indeed, the frequency was occupied) was either a "R" or a "C" with the latter being the more corre; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-07/msg00154.html (8,940 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] New ARRL Section (score: 1): Author: aa0cy@nwrain.com (Bob Wanderer); Date: Sun Oct 10 16:35:01 1999; Gee, maybe we need to examine this issue more carefully. What is the logic or at least the rationale behind this? As far as I'm concerned, the only reason for the new NNY section is so people will ca; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-10/msg00020.html (7,786 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]