Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:aa4lr@arrl.net: 324 ]

Total 324 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 22:16:40 -0400
This is pretty much the sequence that LotW users use. Except we don't upload a raw ADIF file, but instead sign the file to create a .tq8 file and then send that. I haven't needed to fool with a .tq5
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00037.html (9,204 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] NAQP - High-power operations in a low-power contest? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 21:00:23 -0400
From the 3830 Scores list summary: All Single Op HP WJ9B 769 187 10 143,803 FCG NF3R(K3ASK) 218 96 20,928 Pasadena Contest Clu The rules do say "Output power must be limited to 100 watts for eligible
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00213.html (7,518 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] CW Speed Choice (was: ROTTEN OPERATING) (score: 1)
Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman)
Date: Wed Jan 2 10:38:19 2002
I know I've told this story before, but it bears repeating. In 1999, I was part of the #1 USA M/M WPX CW team at NQ4I. Since I'm only a mediocre CW op, Rick put me on 10m, and he swapped out with me.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00022.html (8,221 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] Re: [160m] Speak Now or Forever Hold Your Peace (score: 1)
Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman)
Date: Wed Jan 16 15:23:50 2002
Bill, I have one question for you and Jeff to answer: Why did you submit this petition for mode segmentation prior to the ARRL bandplan taking effect? How could you possibly tell the ARRL bandplan wo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00357.html (7,546 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] Reminder -- ARRL 160m bandplan for NAQP (score: 1)
Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman)
Date: Thu Jan 17 10:29:27 2002
Just a reminder for NAQP Phone operators this weekend of the ARRL bandplan. SSB operation ought to be above 1843 kHz, with domestic QSOs above 1850 kHz. See you on the bands this weekend. Bill Colema
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00368.html (6,818 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] Not Another Contest Category (score: 1)
Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman)
Date: Mon Jan 28 10:01:13 2002
Seems like this comes up a couple of times a year. And it seems like the same tired old arguments are made each time. And it seems like the same tired old refutations are made each time. So, here we
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00602.html (9,979 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] Rate meter... (score: 1)
Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman)
Date: Mon Jan 28 10:17:42 2002
Typically, when contesters refer to the "rate meter" they mean the "last 10" rate displayed by many contest programs. Traditionally, programs like CT and NA (and I don't remember for TR) display the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00604.html (8,387 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] Re: Topband: Re: rm-10352 (score: 1)
Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman)
Date: Mon Jan 28 10:24:19 2002
Tom, one detail. The FCC does not "enforce" ARRL bandplans. Bandplans have no legal force. The FCC DOES however enforce violations of willful interference. Non-compliance with a bandplan greatly incr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00605.html (7,290 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] Not Another Contest Category (score: 1)
Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman)
Date: Mon Jan 28 11:26:12 2002
Skilled SO2R operators may find it to have an advantage. Highly skilled SO1R operators may disagree. Just having the equipment isn't enough -- you have to have the skill. Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00609.html (7,958 bytes)

10. [CQ-Contest] RTTY WPX and NA Sprint CW this weekend (score: 1)
Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman)
Date: Thu Feb 7 15:07:11 2002
Easy. Region 1 (and much of Region 3) only has 7000-7100 kHz. SSB operations typically go down to 7040 kHz. Then RTTY, then CW. You'll also note that the QRP CW calling frequency is 7040. 7040 is the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-02/msg00053.html (9,682 bytes)

11. [CQ-Contest] RTTY sigs down around 7035... (score: 1)
Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman)
Date: Mon Feb 11 15:04:50 2002
You obviously haven't listened to the Novice CW area in a long, long while. This area is a virtual wasteland now. It is grossly underutilized. Says who? Is there an ARRL survey for that? A petition?
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-02/msg00142.html (8,756 bytes)

12. [CQ-Contest] Little Gun Dilemma: Callsign not acknowledged (score: 1)
Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman)
Date: Wed Feb 20 14:57:58 2002
No, for me, this weekend it was: he: CQ TEST S5SOMETHING me: AA4LR he: TA4LR 599 KW me: AA4LR he: TA4LR 599 KW me: AA4LR he: TA4LR 599 KW me: AA4LR AA4LR he: TA4LR 599 KW me: AA4LR AA4LR he: TA4LR 59
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-02/msg00304.html (8,831 bytes)

13. [CQ-Contest] Re: Linears in the closet (score: 1)
Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman)
Date: Wed Mar 13 10:35:07 2002
You right, but perhaps they are just the most egregious example. I mean, I remember reading an article about an Italian M/M effort writeup in NCJ. The author went to great lengths to describe all the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00237.html (9,163 bytes)

14. [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX SSB on Easter Weekend ? (score: 1)
Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman)
Date: Sun Mar 17 14:04:37 2002
There are plenty of Muslims, Jews, Hindi, and others that do not celebrate Easter. Of course, for me, having WPX SSB on Easter weekend means only a part-time effort is possible.... Bill Coleman, AA4L
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00323.html (8,344 bytes)

15. [CQ-Contest] Re: Linears in the closet (score: 1)
Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman)
Date: Mon Mar 18 11:10:00 2002
You're right. Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr@arrl.net Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!" -- Wilbur Wright, 1901
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00337.html (8,421 bytes)

16. [CQ-Contest] Re: Linears in the closet (score: 1)
Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman)
Date: Mon Mar 18 11:08:28 2002
Are they? I mean, if you've crossed the line at 300 watts, why stop at 1.5 kW? Why not go to 3 kW, or 10 kW? After all, if you're breaking the rules, you might as well break them good, right? If Ital
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00338.html (9,208 bytes)

17. [CQ-Contest] Spotting (score: 1)
Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman)
Date: Mon Mar 18 11:50:37 2002
I wonder if we need smarter spotting software. Why couldn't the software keep track of the last 30 minutes or so of spots, and then inhibit spotting of a station if it was spotted already? That way,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00339.html (8,523 bytes)

18. [CQ-Contest] LR and LPL spots (score: 1)
Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman)
Date: Mon Mar 18 15:27:21 2002
Uh, Jim you mis-interepreted me. I was speaking of spots *OF* K3LR or W3LPL. Not spots of other stations FROM K3LR or W3LPL. In CQWW, I can't work K3LR or W3LPL for credit from the US. (OK, it could
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00346.html (8,145 bytes)

19. [CQ-Contest] Spotting (score: 1)
Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman)
Date: Tue Mar 19 09:34:06 2002
Right! And you might consider comparing the comment field as well. Consider, say a 40m spot that has QSX 7220. If the DX changes his listening frequency (QSX 7240), you'd want that spot to go out. So
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00357.html (7,710 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT-920 - IC-718 (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 22:37:46 -0400
I think this depiction is inaccurate. The so-called "dead years" have a number of innovative rigs introduced: Elecraft K2 and K2/100 TenTec Orion IC-7800 FT-7900DX And even that misses the FT-1000 va
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00364.html (10,401 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu