Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:aa4lr@arrl.net: 324 ]

Total 324 documents matching your query.

241. Re: [CQ-Contest] Fw: SO1R and SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 08:16:41 -0400
You don't need the contest sponsors to judge this for you, you can do this yourself! I know I do. I don't always keep every contest/category memorized, but for those few contests I do "seriously", I'
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00530.html (9,247 bytes)

242. Re: [CQ-Contest] LOUD cans (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 19:09:57 -0400
Back in the mid-80s, I went to one of the first "last tour" concerts of The Who. It was at the Lakewood amphitheater pavilion in Atlanta. Our seats were about 300 feet from the stage, just 25 feet ou
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00539.html (7,475 bytes)

243. Re: [CQ-Contest] "?" not equal to "QRL?" (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 22:48:58 -0400
While I agree with Mark, the crucial issue isn't what is sent to determine if a frequency is in use. The critical component is how much you LISTEN to determine if a frequency is in use. Far too often
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-08/msg00418.html (10,612 bytes)

244. Re: [CQ-Contest] A proposal (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 23:53:52 -0400
How are 17 and 12m any narrower than the 40m band in Region 2? Actually, there are still some parts of 30m that are shared with the Fixed service. 17 and 12m are exclusive amateur world-wide. And yet
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-09/msg00014.html (8,190 bytes)

245. Re: [CQ-Contest] Thanks, .......Boston and Maine visit. (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 09:11:49 -0400
And he had no receiver, so he couldn't see if the frequency was in use or not, regardless of whether o he transmitted "QRL?", "?" or "IE" ('C' in continental Morse).... Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL M
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-09/msg00023.html (7,035 bytes)

246. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why did the Canadians (PT5M) beat the Americans(PW5C) in WRTC 2006? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 20:41:43 -0400
So, Jim, which 10 feet is this? From 50 to 60 feet? Or from 100 to 110 feet? Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr@arrl.net Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!" -- Wilbur Wright
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-09/msg00058.html (7,368 bytes)

247. Re: [CQ-Contest] band plan and DX window and ...oh just forgetabout it (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 10:44:43 -0500
See below. Mercifully, when Regions 1 and 3 move to a 200 kHz allocation for 40m in 2009, hopefully the RTTY DX frequency will move up higher in the band (like about 7080 kHz). In the meantime, it is
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00655.html (7,946 bytes)

248. Re: [CQ-Contest] band plan and DX window and ...oh just forgetaboutit (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 14:59:41 -0500
No argument from me, but moving QRP lower or higher didn't make much sense, either. You move them lower to get away from the digital guys, they they run into the QRQ. Higher and they end up fighting
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00666.html (8,839 bytes)

249. Re: [CQ-Contest] cut numbers (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 09:46:57 -0500
The log-checking will not bust you for a bad RST. We have to send it because it is in the rules. -- This reminds me of the times I'm watching television, and some character on a show does something t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00670.html (7,887 bytes)

250. Re: [CQ-Contest] CW Accuracy (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 12:03:17 -0500
Sorry for responding to an old message. If your typing ability is the problem -- why not just learn how to type? It's a skill, like CW, and can be learned with practice. There are several software pr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00672.html (7,583 bytes)

251. Re: [CQ-Contest] Improving Concentration (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 08:28:19 -0500
I don't know where this study came from, but it has been known for many years that humans operate optimally in a very narrow skin temperature range. Above 85 degrees, thinking slows down considerably
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00091.html (9,874 bytes)

252. [CQ-Contest] Interesting Contest Idea.... (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:03:46 -0500
I was thinking something similar earlier. I had fun during SKN working stations on a rock-bound CW transmitter that I had just finished the week before, and I was reflecting on how much ham radio had
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00247.html (8,012 bytes)

253. [CQ-Contest] Inconsiderate CW Operators.... (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 23:14:28 -0500
Yes, this weekend during the CQ 160m CW contest, there were lots of inconsiderate CW operators, operating way above 1843 kHz -- I heard some of them as high as 1880 kHz. There's plenty of space for C
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00355.html (7,419 bytes)

254. Re: [CQ-Contest] Inconsiderate CW Operators.... (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 21:03:55 -0500
Oh, I think I thought about this a lot.... Yup. No, it wouldn't. Doug, I wasn't really, really serious about that posting. The <grin> at the end should have given that away. My point was to highlight
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00364.html (8,510 bytes)

255. [CQ-Contest] The spotting network needs.... (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:41:26 -0500
It became abundantly clear this weekend working the ARRL DX at the NQ4I M/M that the spotting network needs to have a Mode field. I lost count of the number of times I had to delete spots (many of th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00317.html (7,201 bytes)

256. Re: [CQ-Contest] AA prefixes (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 12:34:54 -0400
I have held this call for over 20 years, and it still astounds me that so many folks have trouble with the prefix on SSB, and sometimes even on CW. I'm frequently confused for a a PA4 or DA4 A while
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00295.html (7,468 bytes)

257. Re: [CQ-Contest] A call to action (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 09:31:16 -0400
Sorry for replying to an old message (I'm behind), but I have to differ with this opinion, Tom, for two good reasons: 1) There's no relationship between Contest CW and regulatory CW. In the US, the h
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00305.html (8,477 bytes)

258. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest CQ format? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 14:56:59 -0400
I for one, can't stand this format, especially for CW contests. While tuning across, I'll hear "5u test". Whereas, if you had used the standard format of TEST KG5U KG5U, I might have gotten "5U KG5U"
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00313.html (9,187 bytes)

259. Re: [CQ-Contest] Jay Seven Oh Jay - so...are you changing your log? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 00:15:01 -0400
Back in the days of paper logs, it was not uncommon for someone to rewrite the log sheets in order to make the log entries readable and presentable for submission. In doing so, many minor errors, suc
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00348.html (7,214 bytes)

260. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R REMOTE CONTESTING (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 08:37:45 -0400
Seems to me that as long as all the signal origination (transmitter) and signal capture (receiver) points reside in a single 500m circle, there's really no issue here. The results would be no differe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00425.html (7,596 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu