Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:aa4lr@arrl.net: 324 ]

Total 324 documents matching your query.

261. Re: [CQ-Contest] tech challenge - SAY WHAT? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 19:40:21 -0400
I'd like to add that this works at all levels of competition, too. It's not just reserved for guys in the top 10 in their category. Not everyone enters a contest to win. Some people compete on a very
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00491.html (7,709 bytes)

262. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cut numbers (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 13:53:43 -0400
Hank wrote this a while back, but I'll put in an observation from the recent WPX CW, as well as some other contests. If I sent a single-digit number, or a two-digit number, specially later in the con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00201.html (7,828 bytes)

263. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY Reflections (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 10:34:22 -0400
Old message, but an important point. I always operate RTTY with headphones on, with the volume set low (to save my hearing). It's amazing the number of cues you can get from listening to the signal t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00369.html (7,976 bytes)

264. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY replace CW contesting?? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 12:48:42 -0400
The rule differences between the CQ WW and WPX contest, as well as those between the SS and RU contests are most likely due to the same cause: The number of potential RTTY operators has historically
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00372.html (8,853 bytes)

265. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY replace CW contesting?? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 12:55:34 -0400
I'm not sure if I agree with this. There are at least four good reasons to use CW, even if it is not required for licensing: 1) DXing -- some DX is either only on CW, or is substantially easier to wo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00373.html (7,792 bytes)

266. Re: [CQ-Contest] FW: Why have different classes at all? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 23:02:02 -0400
I hate SCP. I'm often confused for AA4CR -- people hear AA4?R on phone, and they naturally pick the first thing on the list that matches. I often wish ops would spend less time looking at SCP and mor
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00414.html (8,079 bytes)

267. Re: [CQ-Contest] [CQ-contest] Vote now!! (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 21:18:28 -0500
As primarily a low power little pistol, this sort of thing happens to me all the time. I use this trick extensively. It's often surprising who isn't coming back to you, but instead to someone you can
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00571.html (7,557 bytes)

268. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1 million qso's? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 19:03:51 -0500
I think I made somewhere between 50 and 100. Contest contacts are different from casual contacts. The CW proficiency required for a contest contact is very different. CW contests also seem to activat
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00002.html (7,522 bytes)

269. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1 million qso's? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 22:05:21 -0500
If not "vast" then a majority. In that case, 40% not working CW isn't surprising. Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr@arrl.net Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!" -- Wilbur W
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00005.html (7,665 bytes)

270. Re: [CQ-Contest] Xtreme category, catch 22 (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 08:28:41 -0400
Except the casual contest operator who enters the CQ contests merely to expand his DXCC entities worked may not be operating at that level of detail. And imagine the frustration amoung DXers when an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00289.html (9,757 bytes)

271. Re: [CQ-Contest] Adding challenges to Field Day (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 17:36:50 -0400
Some years ago, I remember visiting the field day setup of W4GR. I had gotten there about 10 pm. They had set up several stations, and I happen to find an empty seat at the 40m SSB station. While the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00426.html (10,452 bytes)

272. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Club Categories (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 00:06:35 -0400
It's certainly possibly for a local club to complete in the medium or unlimited categories. A local club with more than 10 entries certainly qualifies for the medium category, and with more than 50 e
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-07/msg00018.html (8,738 bytes)

273. Re: [CQ-Contest] MFJ SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 07:47:24 -0400
Curious. This link now brings up a page with no picture, a price of $0.00, and no product description. It's like the product was nearly withdrawn. Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr@arrl.net We
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-07/msg00117.html (7,781 bytes)

274. Re: [CQ-Contest] MFJ SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 19:14:11 -0400
AH! I see, the extra underscore is messing this up. URL should be: http://www.mfjenterprises.com/Product.php?productid=MFJ-643 Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr@arrl.net Web: http://boringhamr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-07/msg00122.html (9,363 bytes)

275. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting rationale (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 23:01:04 -0400
Would they? The spotting network has code that eliminates redundant spots that usually come from network loops. If the same station is spotting every few minutes, most of the spots could be eliminate
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-07/msg00304.html (11,011 bytes)

276. Re: [CQ-Contest] No Self Spotting - history (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 07:38:11 -0400
There would be a handful of M/M stations who would likely find you from the spot -- although there is a possibility they would happen upon you by tuning if you call CQ. Self-spotting would make it a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-07/msg00310.html (8,148 bytes)

277. Re: [CQ-Contest] Chairs (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 21:22:06 -0400
One of the most comfortable chairs I own is like this. My parents obtained it from their church when they remodeled the Sunday school classrooms. I sit in this chair every day at meal time. I also ow
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-09/msg00042.html (7,623 bytes)

278. Re: [CQ-Contest] [Bulk] Best callsign letters (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 09:41:29 -0400
"Radio" seems to get through when nothing else will. "Lima" has no voice energy, and is often confused with "Charlie", and "Kilo". Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr@arrl.net Web: http://boring
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00333.html (9,684 bytes)

279. Re: [CQ-Contest] Best callsign letters (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:05:09 -0400
Ironically, people still have lots of trouble with my suffix. A few, especially europeans, have trouble with my prefix as well. For those letters to be effective, you have to be as loud as K3LR, W3LP
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00340.html (9,873 bytes)

280. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY Contests (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 21:33:53 -0400
I'm by no means an expert in all the windows software, but I've had good success with using MMTTY and N1MM together. The integration isn't perfect, but it works well enough to be effective. Bill Cole
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-05/msg00131.html (8,373 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu