Mail Archive Search: <+from:ames@force.DECNET.LOCKHEED.COM>

Results:

References: [ +from:ames@force.DECNET.LOCKHEED.COM: 33 ]

Total 33 documents matching your query.

21. UNSUBSCRIBE (score: 1): Author: ames@force.DECNET.LOCKHEED.COM (ames@force.DECNET.LOCKHEED.COM); Date: Fri Jul 29 15:38:03 1994; It seems quite clear that even a <insert flame bait here> can send a <ditto> message via CQ-CONTEST. Yet, there seems to be some confusion about sending "unsubscribe" to cq-contest-request? A brief t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-07/msg00142.html (7,373 bytes)
22. UNSUBSCRIBE (corrected) (score: 1): Author: ames@force.DECNET.LOCKHEED.COM (ames@force.DECNET.LOCKHEED.COM); Date: Fri Jul 29 15:51:58 1994; It seems quite clear that even a <insert flame bait here> can send a <ditto> message via CQ-CONTEST. Yet, there seems to be some confusion about sending "unsubscribe" to cq-contest-request? A brief t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-07/msg00143.html (7,094 bytes)
23. FINAL TUBES = ? (score: 1): Author: ames@force.DECNET.LOCKHEED.COM (ames@force.DECNET.LOCKHEED.COM); Date: Thu Aug 11 11:55:05 1994; The implications here are giving me some "gas". Lately, I've been working some of the RTTY contests with the awesome power of a TS830. Normally, in CW and Phone with 200 Watts Input we get 100 watts; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-08/msg00047.html (12,375 bytes)
24. NJ QSO (score: 1): Author: ames@force.DECNET.LOCKHEED.COM (ames@force.DECNET.LOCKHEED.COM); Date: Tue Aug 16 09:27:18 1994; Well, the XYL is going out of town for a week so I'm planning a bit of uninhibited contesting (viz, NA QSO, SEANET, SARTG RTTY, KCJ & NJ QSO) this weekend. For NJ QSO, we'll be working multi-muti wit; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-08/msg00075.html (7,433 bytes)
25. Multi-Contesting (score: 1): Author: ames@force.DECNET.LOCKHEED.COM (ames@force.DECNET.LOCKHEED.COM); Date: Wed Aug 24 10:42:05 1994; This may be of interest to other little pistols who need to put more FUN into those contest weekends when things are less than terrific. Last weekend looked perfect for Multi-Contesting, working seve; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-08/msg00117.html (15,350 bytes)
26. too much faith in their computers (score: 1): Author: ames@force.DECNET.LOCKHEED.COM (ames@force.DECNET.LOCKHEED.COM); Date: Tue Aug 30 10:37:16 1994; Bill, KM9P, raises an interesting point on antenna design, and the use of computer simulation. I'm no expert on antennas, but I did take one course in grad school and expect to install Wires/NEC in m; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-08/msg00141.html (9,334 bytes)
27. W*/125 Madness (score: 1): Author: ames@force.DECNET.LOCKHEED.COM (ames@force.DECNET.LOCKHEED.COM); Date: Mon Sep 12 14:24:37 1994; Apropos the comments on the /125 activity, as a value judgement I figure if a call shows up on the Packet*Cluster it must be a "good" thing - even if you see Ops posting their own call. Altho I have; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-09/msg00079.html (13,575 bytes)
28. WA QSO Party Software (score: 1): Author: ames@force.DECNET.LOCKHEED.COM (ames@force.DECNET.LOCKHEED.COM); Date: Mon Sep 19 12:12:46 1994; I am sure others besides W5ASP would like to obtain a copy of those files if available. If anyone is planning on using NA for CAL QSO Party, in-state, California seems to be missing as a MULT. Fixing; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-09/msg00139.html (11,035 bytes)
29. CQ WW RTTY Scoring (score: 1): Author: ames@force.DECNET.LOCKHEED.COM (ames@force.DECNET.LOCKHEED.COM); Date: Tue Sep 27 10:40:00 1994; After the contest, I really read thru the rules in an attempt to figure out how to score a QSO with OK1DX/MM. The rules appear to have changed on multipliers, check how UR reporting K/VE as mults, an; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-09/msg00191.html (9,862 bytes)
30. CQ WW Scoring (resolved) (score: 1): Author: ames@force.DECNET.LOCKHEED.COM (ames@force.DECNET.LOCKHEED.COM); Date: Fri Sep 30 09:38:37 1994; Ray, WF1B, helped resolve this issue on all three points. First, there were not changes in the rules - only the way it was written. At Ray's suggestion, I also called Roy Gould, KT1N, and he says tha; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-09/msg00203.html (24,300 bytes)
31. CQP 10 meters (score: 1): Author: ames@force.DECNET.LOCKHEED.COM (ames@force.DECNET.LOCKHEED.COM); Date: Tue Oct 4 10:52:44 1994; WA6GFY was calling CQ on 10 meters Saturday, but no takers. I started on 20 meters, and N2AA asked if 10 m was open on the West Coast. I moved up to 15 and worked some startions there. When I moved u; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-10/msg00025.html (6,449 bytes)
32. ZZ Top M/M (score: 1): Author: ames@force.DECNET.LOCKHEED.COM (ames@force.DECNET.LOCKHEED.COM); Date: Wed Oct 12 11:37:51 1994; Like many others, I missed the ZZ Top thing. But there is a brief but mildly interesting article about Dxpeditioning to Peter 1 etc. in latest issue of "Outside". This is the magazine which always se; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-10/msg00058.html (8,998 bytes)
33. Open Logs (score: 1): Author: ames@force.DECNET.LOCKHEED.COM (ames@force.DECNET.LOCKHEED.COM); Date: Tue Oct 18 12:17:37 1994; I don't know if this a factor worth considering in the discussion, but but I was under the impression that the people who help with scores thought they had a thank-less job to begin with. If you want; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-10/msg00075.html (10,476 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 33
Page: [1] [2]