Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:at@at-communication.com: 63 ]

Total 63 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] CQ WW support etc (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander Teimurazov" <at@at-communication.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 11:35:20 +0400
Hi Question is quite difficult Of course is better for all of as if results will be avaible on the site but on the same time number of CQ subscribers will go down for sure because I dont believe that
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00200.html (10,033 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW support etc (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander Teimurazov" <at@at-communication.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 09:40:12 +0400
Dear Kelly, Im not talking about remove penalties If I copy call sign wrong then propably its ok to penalize (on the same time penalti level is so high ) but I think for not in the log people dont ha
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00209.html (9,186 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW support etc (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander Teimurazov" <at@at-communication.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 17:29:45 +0400
Dear Kelly, So often its happen whenever you work station and everything is ok and even you receive qsl and you find that you are not in his contest log Another problem is MS station when they are wo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00210.html (11,207 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Contest Complaining (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander Teimurazov" <at@at-communication.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 14:39:52 +0400
GREAT ED I agree on everything 73 Al 4L5A/D4B complaints of receiving no certificates after 3 or more years from a contest have been sent directly to the CQ Contest Organizers. If you get any respons
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00220.html (8,335 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Duration (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander Teimurazov" <at@at-communication.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 10:36:49 +0400
Hi Rick, I agree with you I think if CQ WW and ARRL contest will have category lets say 40 hours or 38 hours additionally to 48 I think that might be quite popular category and many contesters will p
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00345.html (12,537 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Duration (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander Teimurazov" <at@at-communication.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 10:36:49 +0400
Hi Rick, I agree with you I think if CQ WW and ARRL contest will have category lets say 40 hours or 38 hours additionally to 48 I think that might be quite popular category and many contesters will p
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00934.html (12,537 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX log submission (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander Teimurazov" <at@at-communication.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 16:19:36 +0400
Dear Igor, I send my log and get confirmation with no problem Try again Try robot because Steve is travelling lot and propably he is out now If you like you can send me your log and I will try to sen
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-06/msg00283.html (9,939 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] WPX (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander Teimurazov" <AT@AT-COMMUNICATION.COM>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 09:43:56 -0100
To support PY5EG idea to send logs in 24 hours Im trying to send log to wpx but not lucky Allways get answer like that Your message has encountered delivery problems to the following recipient(s): SS
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00407.html (7,167 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] saving us from ourselves (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander Teimurazov" <at@at-communication.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 16:13:30 +0300
Great idea dear Zack 73 Al 4L5A/D4B station, you close the door,leave the house for the weekend, and 48 hrs later look and see how your computer/software did in the contest? I think we'd be better of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-03/msg00188.html (11,980 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] ANOTHER SMELLY SUBJECT (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander Teimurazov" <at@at-communication.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2004 11:44:51 +0400
Hi Yuri Time to time that subject about PA appear I think what David K1TTT is do is great He give lot of statistic and also he is really dont say anything about clasters he talking about self spots m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00082.html (16,859 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] ANOTHER SMELLY SUBJECT (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander Teimurazov" <at@at-communication.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2004 18:20:02 +0400
I agree with Jose I think that discussion will dont change lot First of all there is no chance to control those things Then I dont know top contester world wide who is use 10kw or something like that
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00088.html (15,733 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] ANOTHER SMELLY SUBJECT..regs on antennas (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander Teimurazov" <at@at-communication.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 10:05:39 +0400
Hi again I think there is several points 1 In US regulation is say 1,5 kw but not in other countries like Russia and Italy and if its international contest I dont think committee have to care about U
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00115.html (13,316 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] ANOTHER SMELLY SUBJECT..regs on antennas (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander Teimurazov" <at@at-communication.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 17:38:02 +0400
I agree with Jim lets start with 100watt contesting and will work on ants Then story will start again but power propably will be reduced ??? I think there is some issues which is quite difficult to c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00124.html (11,921 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] ANOTHER SMELLY SUBJECT (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander Teimurazov" <at@at-communication.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2004 12:46:58 +0400
Dear Yuri, Im not talking now about power limit in Italy Im talking about rules in the contest You know no one of big contesters in Italy and Russia using 300w Ok I think its up to them today they ar
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00161.html (30,399 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Where are the W/VE's (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander Teimurazov" <at@at-communication.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:21:31 +0400
Dear Jim, I agree with you Last ARRL I call too many CQs with no callers I hope anyway something will change I also agree with you that European activity is coming up 73 Al 4L5A/D4B of there a perspe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-06/msg00299.html (10,958 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW single band entry plus check log. (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander Teimurazov" <AT@AT-COMMUNICATION.COM>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 11:50:27 -0100
Dear Robert, You will you make configuration of programm you need to say Single Band and then when you work stations on another bands they are will give you 0 points Robot will accept one log includi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-10/msg00171.html (8,941 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] number of operators (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander Teimurazov" <at@at-communication.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 10:20:20 +0300
Hi When David K1TTT is publis that he say that number of spots is very low and dont really change something and cant add lot of qsos to Alberto result I think that just approve that if someone will l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00152.html (10,792 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Voice memory keyers (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander Teimurazov" <at@at-communication.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 18:09:17 +0300
I agree Im using SCK II ZS4TX and dont have any problem 73 Al 4L5A/D4B _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/ma
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00213.html (9,903 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] Fw: [3830] CQWW CW A61AJ(SM7PKK) SOSB/80 HP (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander Teimurazov" <at@at-communication.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 10:51:56 +0300
Dear Timo, I know A61AJ team have permission from committee My personal opinion is that point in rules is WRONG but on the same time committee have to follow the rules If they are agree that point is
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00061.html (9,631 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] Line Scores (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander Teimurazov" <at@at-communication.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 16:11:20 +0300
Its interesting why NCJ is not publishing ARRL contest results I know NCJ is ARRL magazine also? If not then really NCJ is in difficult position and they are magazine from contester with difficulties
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00163.html (14,272 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu