- 221. [CQ-Contest] LoTW applications (score: 1)
- Author: Ktfrog007--- via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
- Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2015 21:14:35 -0400
- A German ham wrote privately to me that an argument against LotW is its requirement to send hardcopies of realworld personal documents for foreign stations That is NOT true. Here's a quote from the A
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00081.html (9,578 bytes)
- 222. [CQ-Contest] WAE QTC tactics (score: 1)
- Author: Bob Kupps via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 03:43:09 -0700
- Hi while it's still fresh in my mind I would like to ask WAE vets what their QTC tactics are in this interesting contest. I would give out whatever I had when asked but several of these stations came
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00096.html (7,035 bytes)
- 223. [CQ-Contest] OT: CQ L.V./Palm Springs (score: 1)
- Author: OM Norby via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 16:22:28 -0500
- Hi, Have time, will travel ;) Moving around western States but with a very tight schedule, I'll have some time left while being in LV and Palm Springs end of this month/early September. If some of yo
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00104.html (6,900 bytes)
- 224. Re: [CQ-Contest] WAE QTC tactics (score: 1)
- Author: K1AR via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 10:02:03 -0400
- All, I haven't read all the emails in this thread (this is a co-moderated enterprise!), so apologies for any repetition. Those who know me well already know how I feel about QTCs. FWIW, here are my f
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00149.html (10,169 bytes)
- 225. [CQ-Contest] WAE QTC Tactics (score: 1)
- Author: jpescatore--- via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 05:40:47 -0400
- For me, WAEs are good practice for SO2V operation - if I hit an EU station in the midst of a QTC, hit A=B, listen in the "other" ear while continuing tuning.When I hear TU, go back. I wouldn't want t
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00159.html (9,083 bytes)
- 226. Re: [CQ-Contest] Verticals on the beach (AGAIN) (score: 1)
- Author: alannottage--- via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 12:35:46 -0400
- I don't have a scientific calculator to hand Mike, but those '200 ft hills are what 18 degs? 100' is 9degs? The latter is going to be fine for EU on the high bands in good times, but if you're really
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00163.html (13,189 bytes)
- 227. [CQ-Contest] Ohio QSO Party Updates (score: 1)
- Author: K8MR via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 09:37:56 -0400
- This Saturday, August 22, is the Ohio QSO Party, 1600z to 0400z Sunday. (Noon to midnight EDT). Note that there are several rule changes this year. The major one is that we have replaced the serial n
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00188.html (8,444 bytes)
- 228. [CQ-Contest] Fire at K0RF Residence (score: 1)
- Author: George Schultz via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 18:06:13 -0400
- Folks, I was hoping to keep this (relatively) quiet for a day or two, at least...but, it seems already to have gone viral. Here's the news-story in the local paper: http://www.timescall.com/longmont-
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00189.html (8,698 bytes)
- 229. [CQ-Contest] YODX HF Contest this week-end (score: 1)
- Author: ovidiu orza via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 23:06:24 -0700
- Dear contesters, We would like to invite you to the YODX HF Contest 2015, the contest will take place this Saturday, August 29th, from 1200 UTC to Sunday, August 30th at 1200 UTC. We have interesting
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00206.html (7,088 bytes)
- 230. Re: [CQ-Contest] Correction WRTC2018 Team Selection Criteria (score: 1)
- Author: Bob Kupps via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 19:44:01 -0700
- That is a very unfortunate decision by the JARL IMO. Instead they should be expanding the class of LP competitors to outside of Asia. Apparently it's going to be the All JA contest now...what a shame
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00223.html (9,321 bytes)
- 231. Re: [CQ-Contest] Future of Paper Certificates (score: 1)
- Author: Rudy Bakalov via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
- Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2015 20:15:50 -0400
- I personally don't care about a paper certificate, but do remember the excitement of receiving my first one. In fact, it was the certificate that encouraged me to come back to the contesting world ha
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00232.html (11,366 bytes)
- 232. [CQ-Contest] HC8N? (score: 1)
- Author: wp3c@aol.com via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
- Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 15:48:20 GMT
- HI Can someone tell me what happened too HC8N? Thanks Alfredo WP3C Enviado desde mi LG de Claro _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http:
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00236.html (6,952 bytes)
- 233. Re: [CQ-Contest] Future of Paper Certificates (score: 1)
- Author: Rudy Bakalov via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
- Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 13:40:28 -0400
- If this is the case then the magazine has outlived its usefulness and relevance as a contest sponsor. Perhaps some of the equipment manufacturers would be interested in more prominent sponsorship in
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00238.html (15,941 bytes)
- 234. Re: [CQ-Contest] Future of Paper Certificates (score: 1)
- Author: Rudy Bakalov via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
- Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 14:43:36 -0400
- CQ Magazine is utterly mismanaged. It has failed to recognize and embrace the impact of the Internet and user created content. It is not a viable business, with or without printed certificates, unles
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00247.html (10,238 bytes)
- 235. Re: [CQ-Contest] Future of Paper Certificates (score: 1)
- Author: Ktfrog007--- via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
- Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 11:16:27 -0400
- I had an online CQ subscription (which lapsed a few months ago) because I felt mailing the magazine had become a burden for CQ. But I hated the Zinio reader and couldn't access it on my Nook e-reader
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00253.html (9,523 bytes)
- 236. Re: [CQ-Contest] Future of Paper Certificates (score: 1)
- Author: Rudy Bakalov via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
- Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 18:06:03 +0000 (UTC)
- Publishing online has nothing to do with embracing the Internet. The internet is just another distribution method. One example of embracing the internet is creating a community. The most basic exampl
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00256.html (10,698 bytes)
- 237. [CQ-Contest] CQ WW 2014 logs analysis uploaded (score: 1)
- Author: Stan via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 13:03:30 +0100
- Hi! CQ WW is in less than 2 months. I have uploaded 2014 CQ WW logs into the contest analyser. Looking at QSO rates, CQWW 2014 activity was on par with 2013. CQWW 2007-2014 contest rates analysis is
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00003.html (7,597 bytes)
- 238. Re: [CQ-Contest] Counting uniques (score: 1)
- Author: Ktfrog007--- via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
- Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2015 12:36:33 -0400
- I guess that depends how much time the sponsors have to run them down. In addition to checking whether Unassisted types are cheating. And who has bad signals and should be DQed. Same for power cheate
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00040.html (8,965 bytes)
- 239. Re: [CQ-Contest] Counting uniques (score: 1)
- Author: John Dorr via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 09:12:33 -0400
- All, As is often said on this channel, "calm down." No one is advocating that all uniques be removed from logs and be classified as bad calls. Of course there are examples such as Hans' QSO and other
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00053.html (11,342 bytes)
- 240. [CQ-Contest] CQWW activity 2007-2014 (score: 1)
- Author: Stan via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 14:02:13 +0100
- Hi Just for a bit of fun, I have put aggregated CQWW log data into an Excel file and pointed pivot tables to it. Below are some graphs and insights into CQWW QSO rates from 2007 to 2014 by area, band
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00054.html (11,876 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu