CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Counting uniques

To: Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Counting uniques
From: John Dorr via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Reply-to: John Dorr <k1ar@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 09:12:33 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
All,

As is often said on this channel, "calm down." No one is advocating that all 
uniques be removed from logs and be classified as bad calls. Of course there 
are examples such as Hans' QSO and others.

The point is that in a large contest such as the CQWW, it is very rare to work 
a station that no one else has worked, thus suggesting that many of the unique 
QSOs that show up in logs are probably busted calls.

A high ratio of uniques is nothing more than an indicator to a log checker for 
most contests.

No worries -- your uniqueness is safe! See you in this thread in 2018 when we 
pick up where we left off this time. :-)

Has anyone done anything interesting this summer to get ready for the fall 
contest season?

73, John, K1AR


Sent from my iPhone

> On Sep 6, 2015, at 7:09 PM, "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I just worked 9K9Z in the AA test to fill a band/mode slot.
> 
> Hope he doesn't get demoted, as he's the only station I worked in that 
> contest.
> 
> dit dit
> 
> de HB
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message----- From: Ktfrog007--- via CQ-Contest
> Sent: Sunday, September 06, 2015 4:36 PM
> To: w1rm@comcast.net ; cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Counting uniques
> 
> 
> I guess that depends how much time the sponsors  have to run them down.  In
> addition to checking whether Unassisted types  are cheating.  And who has
> bad signals and should be DQed.  Same for  power cheaters.  And ghost ops.
> What have I left out?
> 
> After a while that could become a real 80 hour a  week job.
> 
> 73,
> Ken, AB1J
> 
> 
> 
> In a message dated 9/6/2015 15:10:03 GMT Standard Time, w1rm@comcast.net
> writes:
> 
> I would  argue that just because the call is unique, doesn't automatically
> mean it's  broken and warrants further investigation.
> 
> 
> Pete,  W1RM
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>