CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Counting uniques

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Counting uniques
From: "JIM NEIGER" <n6tj@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 12:04:43 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I believe that uniques should count, and have witnessed over the decades - very much depending upon from where I'm operating - the rarer, the more real uniques. QUESTION: SU1AH needed me for a new DXCC when I was at D44BC in the late '80's. Do I not count this double multiplier because Ahmad worked only me??

Fundamentally more troubling to me is that AGAIN the Committee seems to be on a quest to combine Single Operator with Single Operator/Assisted. I thought the survey it conducted a couple years ago answered that?? Assisted is with us forever. Fondly and encourage its use, and manage it appropriately. Just categorize all assisted as MULTI-OPERATOR, which it truly is............

QUESTION: Will the Committee Leadership continue to conduct this survey until it gets the answer it wants?? If that's reality, that's fine. Just share with us all that it's the Committee's goal. Thank you.

Vy 73

Jim Neiger
N6TJ

-----Original Message----- From: Oliver Dröse
Sent: Friday, September 04, 2015 6:53 AM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Counting uniques

Charles,

​American bosses of American contests show little understanding nor care
for the DX entries.

Interesting viewpoint taking into account they just asked YOU for YOUR
opinion on the topic of uniques!

73, Olli


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>