Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dezrat1242@ispwest.com: 247 ]

Total 247 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Support (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2005 20:32:49 -0700
_________________________________________________ Thank goodness this attitude is held by only a few. Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00173.html (10,193 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Fw: CQWW results (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 18:58:49 -0700
_________________________________________________ Nonsense. We are CQ Magazine's "customers" and we have every right to complain if something's not to our satisfaction. Whether CQ chooses to fix it o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00205.html (7,608 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 18:26:23 -0700
_________________________________________________ The moaning and groaning is right on. LoTW is far too complex for the level of security needed. I can log into my bank account with only a user name
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00392.html (9,547 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Duration (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 09:48:41 -0700
_________________________________________________ Deep down inside everyone wants to win. Many of us know that won't happen given our current location/equipment/whatever, but we have that tiny spark
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00407.html (9,324 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:23:41 -0700
_________________________________________________ I agree about the initial level of security during the sign up phase. The ARRL's requirement to send the password only to the address in the FCC's da
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00408.html (10,575 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:33:04 -0700
<snip> _________________________________________________ Look at this way: Could LoTW be simplified and still be secure? Yes, absolutely. All that should be necessary to upload a log is to go the LoT
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00409.html (9,862 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting software and RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:48:38 -0700
_________________________________________________ Interesting story, but I suspect there is some other problem in your system. I have installed N1MM Logger both ways - keeping the old files and insta
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00417.html (10,151 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 19:04:38 -0700
_________________________________________________ "How much easier can it get?" you ask. Ok, here's how I envision it: 1. Go to LoTW website. 2. Enter your user id and password. 3. Upload ADIF file.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00418.html (10,193 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 19:47:00 -0700
_________________________________________________ Like several others, Van, you have missed the point of my post. Of course it can be made to work. I have been issued DXCC for Mixed, Phone, 20 and 15
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00430.html (9,872 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:09:50 -0700
"Such is life". Sigh. With that attitude, we'd still be using spark. LoTW only gives credit when two stations submit the same info. Did you submit the above QSO? Of course not, so what is your compla
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00440.html (9,998 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:16:58 -0700
_________________________________________________ Point taken, Ted. I have nothing against complexity when it is needed, but LoTW is an example of overkill. We all have only so much energy to spend s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00441.html (10,146 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:26:29 -0700
_________________________________________________ If you honestly believe LoTW is "simple as it can be" then I don't know what to say. LoTW could be MUCH simpler and still retain the high level of se
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00442.html (9,803 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:37:48 -0700
_________________________________________________ It's not "too tough", it's unnecessarily tough. I don't mind spending the time and energy doing something which has been well thought out and simplif
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00443.html (9,912 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:39:21 -0700
_________________________________________________ Well said, Bud. Thanks. Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00444.html (9,437 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting software and RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:42:34 -0700
_________________________________________________ I'm puzzled by your answer. Why is he having problems where hundreds of us are not? Doesn't that indicate a problem in his system that the rest of us
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00445.html (9,440 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting software and RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:46:46 -0700
_________________________________________________ Ok, I agree that's not good advice. My point was that I've done it both ways and both ways work. There would seem to be another problem in his system
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00447.html (9,237 bytes)

17. [CQ-Contest] Message to my Director (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:40:49 -0700
Today, I sent the email below to my ARRL Division Director. If you agree with my feelings, I suggest you send something similar to your Director as well. 73, Bill W6WRT ______________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00463.html (8,733 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting software and RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 19:15:15 -0700
_________________________________________________ Perhaps I misunderstood the original question. Was he saying that if he kept the newer files, everything was ok? Bill, W6WRT ________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00476.html (9,303 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 19:28:28 -0700
_________________________________________________ You don't understand it because you don't think like a crook. I'm sure people who cheat get a great amount of satisfaction from devaluing other peopl
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00477.html (10,164 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 19:51:58 -0700
_________________________________________________ If the LoTW security method is better, why don't the banks use it? Conversely, if the bank's security method is both simpler and adequate, why doesn'
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00502.html (10,105 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13]
This search system is powered by Namazu