Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:egruff@cox.net: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why few "odd" mults around (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Gruff" <egruff@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:17:53 -0800
Charly (and other non-EU stations), I can appreciate your concerns about the Europe-centric focus of some stations during contests. Being on the West Coast of the US, Europe is often not "in range" f
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00371.html (9,720 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] K5GO speaks out for youth in contesting (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Gruff" <egruff@cox.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 15:37:18 -0700
I agree with Tor - I don't know that "young people aren't interested in contesting", but rather that new hams in general probably are intimidated by a "contest" when they are unfamiliar with so many
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-03/msg00207.html (10,633 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Convergence and Change (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Gruff" <egruff@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 12:57:00 -0700
At the risk of belaboring the point, I had a few thoughts when reading the post on this thread, but felt like I wanted to say my piece. My disclaimer is that I've operated many contests over the year
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-05/msg00116.html (10,449 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] All the Assisted ops, where do they all come from? (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Gruff" <egruff@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 10:36:10 -0700
Guys, To quote Mike W7VO, "You bring up a great point, Ken! I had never thought of it that way, and you are right. The only way an unassisted station can say he is truly unassisted is to not be spott
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-05/msg00178.html (10,598 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] RBN Spots? (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Gruff" <egruff@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 10:18:33 -0700
This is hugely helpful. I've been contesting a long time, and never paid much attention to being spotted (I just assumed it happened when someone liked your call or took pity on you). This past weeke
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-05/msg00271.html (8,531 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] RBN Spots? (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Gruff" <egruff@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 18:44:45 -0700
Frank, I was basing my perceived loneliness on the N1MM+ logger info window that pops up each spot of my station. I presume it's based on the DX cluster that I selected for use during the contest, wh
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-05/msg00280.html (9,567 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Its not the Sunspots folks (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Gruff" <egruff@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 08:01:05 -0700
Since the exchange is zones, why not make "DX" a contact between different zones or countries? It doesn't completely level the playing field, but at least the US, Asia and Russia can work geographica
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00046.html (11,529 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why I like contesting more and DXing less (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Gruff" <egruff@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 09:01:58 -0800
I am not a psychologist, but engage in both contesting and DXing fairly seriously at times. I have often tried to explain to family and friends why both activities are something that I love to do, in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00303.html (9,633 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] Self-spotting (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Gruff" <egruff@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 10:38:38 -0800
I heard at least one station asking stations he worked (including me) to "PLEASE SPOT ME" during yesterday's NAQP RTTY. I wonder if he's already been DQ'd. I imagine he didn't know this was a no-no,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-02/msg00207.html (7,050 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] 73 watts (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Gruff" <egruff@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 08:50:54 -0800
For those of you complaining about the "73" power report, I have to say "really?". The rules say that the DX exchange is (emphasis mine), " DX stations send signal report and power (number or abbrevi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00250.html (8,467 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] 73 watts (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Gruff" <egruff@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 15:00:18 -0800
Jim, Or 1 milliwatt! Can you imagine the confusion with "0.001" or "1 MW"? With no capitalization in CW, it might be interpreted as 1,000,000 W, and then everyone on the reflector would be screaming
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00264.html (10,181 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self-spotting explanation from CQWW blog (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Gruff" <egruff@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 12:45:44 -0700
So, if I want to get WX1XXX disqualified, I can just spot him a whole bunch of times? Seems like a bad way to go. And, before you say that I will also be DQ'd, I can do it from my phone, my local lib
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00269.html (10,570 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Be careful what you wish for (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Gruff" <egruff@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 12:07:14 -0800
I agree with the part about it being easier to find open spots on the bandmap to run. Its also a function of having panadapters that let you just point and click to the empty spots. However, there wa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00058.html (11,755 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] So Sunday Sucked? (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Gruff" <egruff@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 20:13:53 -0800
I don't normally get into these rule change discussions, because there are N + 10 opinions for every N hams, but it dawned on me that one or more of the following are fairly easy to implement, might
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00076.html (9,914 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 179, Issue 14 (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Gruff" <egruff@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 20:50:01 -0800
Tor - I think we do need the time restrictions, because the idea is to "force" everyone to stick around until at least partway through Sunday afternoon to get a higher score. I'm way down in the lowe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00100.html (11,553 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 179, Issue 21 (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Gruff" <egruff@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 22:46:13 -0800
I empathize with you, Bill. I am very familiar with the situation you have, because in many VHF contests, 6 Meters is wide open from the Rockies or Mississippi River and east, but completely dead on
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00157.html (9,167 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 179, Issue 36 (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Gruff" <egruff@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 19:22:14 -0800
Ward and Group, As a casual contester, I haven't really felt like I had much to offer regarding spurring participation and recruiting new contesters. However, lately, one of my 16 year-old daughters
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00241.html (13,311 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 179, Issue 36 (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Gruff" <egruff@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2017 23:29:12 -0800
Tom, Many thanks for taking the time to write. I agree I have shown my kids and their friends how much fun playing radio is for me. They are actually very impressed with my tower and giant SteppIR, a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00254.html (17,986 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] Possible changes for CQ VHF Contest (score: 1)
Author: <egruff@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 15:00:35 -0700
All, I feel like I am fighting the same battle on alternate fronts here. It's either "FT8 isn't real radio and shouldn't be allowed" or "No one needs to run 1500 W to work DX". The common thread is t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-07/msg00102.html (11,981 bytes)

20. [CQ-Contest] DMR Chatgroup and Weekly Net/Roundtable (score: 1)
Author: <egruff@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 18:28:25 -0700
Fellow Contesters, A few of us (KL0R, KL7SB, me, and a few of our cronies) have set up a DMR Talkgroup (30121 on Brandmeister) to discuss all aspects of contesting and to provide a forum for assistin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-07/msg00140.html (7,446 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu