Mail Archive Search: <+from:ford@cmgate.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:ford@cmgate.com: 65 ]

Total 65 documents matching your query.

41. [CQ-Contest] Re: Contest Trainer (score: 1): Author: "Ford Peterson" <ford@cmgate.com>; Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 22:15:06 -0500; G4FON does a nifty trainer. I was working with him on getting it to be a Writelog simulator. It works pretty good. You can specify how many people can call you all at once--up to 8 all at once as I r; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-05/msg00276.html (7,632 bytes)
42. Topband: 2004 ARRL 160M Contest (score: 1): Author: "Ford Peterson" <ford@cmgate.com>; Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 20:28:24 -0600; I have been asked to once again write the QST article and web page content for the ARRL 160M contest this coming weekend. (RULES) http://www.arrl.org/contests/rules/2004/160-Meters.html I'm told that; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00830.html (10,109 bytes)
43. [CQ-Contest] Sprint Solicitations... (score: 1): Author: ford@cmgate.com (Ford Peterson); Date: Tue Feb 6 18:54:00 2001; I often read this reflector and wonder how many "contesters" cheat at solitaire? Splitting the rules so close as to constitute "cheating" reminds me of the game similar to solitaire -- that all-time; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-02/msg00056.html (6,599 bytes)
44. [CQ-Contest] Clicks... (score: 1): Author: ford@cmgate.com (Ford Peterson); Date: Tue Mar 6 21:46:11 2001; Bravo Bill! Finally, some data. All those in favor of outlawing FT1000X email the offenders on the list and encourage them to clean up their act. Better yet, start flaming dealers that carry the rig.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00088.html (6,778 bytes)
45. [CQ-Contest] Key Clicks? (score: 1): Author: ford@cmgate.com (Ford Peterson); Date: Wed Mar 7 21:48:51 2001; Bill, you wrote... If the offending station is CW, and the "strong signal" is also CW, then the clicks would appear on some bits but not others. That is not the case here. Many sigs have clicks that; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00112.html (15,521 bytes)
46. [CQ-Contest] Clicks & 5NN K (score: 1): Author: ford@cmgate.com (Ford Peterson); Date: Wed Mar 7 23:18:32 2001; The ARRL logbook describes the RST system inside the back cover of the log. "If the signal has the characteristic steadiness of crystal control, add the letter X to the RST report. If there is a chir; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00113.html (6,817 bytes)
47. [CQ-Contest] Casual contesting (score: 1): Author: ford@cmgate.com (Ford Peterson); Date: Mon Mar 19 20:02:33 2001; Promote or perish! Or should I say, publish or perish? This thread serves to illustrate an important issue that effects myself and every other constester, bar none. I am, in terms of my ability to pa; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00265.html (8,379 bytes)
48. [CQ-Contest] Casual contesting (score: 1): Author: ford@cmgate.com (Ford Peterson); Date: Tue Mar 20 09:07:12 2001; Several comments about scores. I don't subscribe to CQ. The ARRL scores are published in the mag and on the web. Perhaps I've had a brain fade when looking but I can't locate scores on the web anywhe; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00272.html (6,912 bytes)
49. [CQ-Contest] Casual contesting... (score: 1): Author: ford@cmgate.com (Ford Peterson); Date: Tue Mar 20 21:31:29 2001; I've received many comments to my notion that the results need to be published. I falsely assumed the ARRL publishes scores. They do, only to members--both printed and on the web. As an ARRL member,; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00284.html (8,797 bytes)
50. [CQ-Contest] Casual contesting... (score: 1): Author: ford@cmgate.com (Ford Peterson); Date: Wed Mar 21 11:10:23 2001; I received a private correspondence from Dave K4JRB, CQ 160 Contests Director. He has convinced me that I should subscribe to CQ. OK, I'll try it. and later: OK, I'll stand corrected on several point; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00291.html (8,310 bytes)
51. [CQ-Contest] Awards & participation (score: 1): Author: ford@cmgate.com (Ford Peterson); Date: Thu Mar 22 21:37:57 2001; Wouldn't it be nifty if the contest sponsors, all of which have a web page, made available a simple HTML routine that recognized every call that submitted a log to a contest. Once the results are in; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00292.html (7,015 bytes)
52. [CQ-Contest] Ionospheric heating (score: 1): Author: ford@cmgate.com (Ford Peterson); Date: Tue Apr 3 23:01:35 2001; Tom W8JI, I question your summary... Did you mean dense or stupid? Did you mean hot air production or a loose reference to excessive use of bandwidth on reflectors? I'm sure Freud would agree... Ford; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-04/msg00030.html (8,631 bytes)
53. [CQ-Contest] Contest QSLing (score: 1): Author: ford@cmgate.com (Ford Peterson); Date: Wed May 2 23:24:38 2001; "So far the response has been 10-20%. This is PATHETIC!" Well, it is pathetic, but understandable. A good contest weekend can yield 500-2000 QSOs. Let's see... 1,000 Qs X ($0.25 for the card + $0.34; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00033.html (8,306 bytes)
54. [CQ-Contest] Contest QSLing (score: 1): Author: ford@cmgate.com (Ford Peterson); Date: Thu May 3 21:23:25 2001; "The ARRL has been working on this a LONG time (ask Wanye N7NG). It's not going to just happen overnight because every member asked." Several observations: 1) The ARRL wants to control the QSL proces; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00057.html (9,547 bytes)
55. [CQ-Contest] Contest QSLing (score: 1): Author: ford@cmgate.com (Ford Peterson); Date: Fri May 4 22:36:19 2001; Merri and others It is important to many to receive paper QSLs with postage or routed through buros. I understand. It is important to me to get an eQSL. Why is it that those who want paper are lauded; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00074.html (8,685 bytes)
56. [CQ-Contest] July QST arrives "Antenna Issue" (score: 1): Author: ford@cmgate.com (Ford Peterson); Date: Sun Jun 24 23:04:07 2001; I must add my comments to this thread... As a long time member and supporter of ARRL, I too was disappointed in the July issue--at first. Then I read the magazine... In the forward of the new Antenna; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-06/msg00169.html (7,695 bytes)
57. [CQ-Contest] 160 contest logs (score: 1): Author: ford@cmgate.com (Ford Peterson); Date: Sun Feb 27 16:40:20 2000; The SM3CER website announced that the logs can be sent in to K4JRB but I have questions--Is Hawaii on the North American continent or what? What about Caymans? Possibly other questions too. The http:; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-02/msg00194.html (6,665 bytes)
58. [CQ-Contest] Splatter & Performance (score: 1): Author: ford@cmgate.com (Ford Peterson); Date: Fri Mar 10 14:03:58 2000; I find the receiver performance issues to be of interest. To my disappointment, no information is provided on the IC-746, which I just bought in November. Anybody got any idea on how the 746 compares; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-03/msg00131.html (7,159 bytes)
59. [CQ-Contest] Receiver specs (score: 1): Author: ford@cmgate.com (Ford Peterson); Date: Fri Mar 10 17:14:18 2000; I have been following the thread about receiver specs with great interest. I am disappointed that my particular radio: IC-746 was not included in the comparison. The spec sheet talks about a 99db dyn; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-03/msg00134.html (8,053 bytes)
60. [CQ-Contest] Consider This (score: 1): Author: ford@cmgate.com (Ford Peterson); Date: Wed Apr 24 16:09:15 2002; SO2R is to contesting what running two fishing lines is to a fishing contest. Two radios does not double the Qs. It may however double your score. Chasing down mults while running a frequency is not; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00351.html (9,900 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]