2011/6/28 Dave Hachadorian <k6ll@... ... ... ... ... Dave sends an exceptional message to everybody. Not many have congratulated the work done for making the remotely accessible Skimmers. I can tell,
Well, If Paul wants to have the wires in the wireless, that is good. But, I reckon there is a touch of sarcasm in the words above. The Fun's bottom line is, we have the capability and the liberty to
The pole volters have their own rules. And they do their Fun sport on the same arena as the ever Fun having high jumpers. 73, Jukka OH6LI _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest ma
In RDXC there is the claimed and final result available. Not details what and how was lost. Could that be a compromise? Some years ago when I did log checking for a SAC, I made up a comparative figur
Juha and all, The rule intention is to prevent simultaneous CQ from one station. Main driver is available bandwidth. By this rule, for example 160SSB can be used in Europe. Without this rule, there c
Wally, The Jamies of the world simply operate that way. They contest about how many people go to read their webpage. By doing what he is doing, he sure gets readers. But to the question, are the read
Sending some emails does not establish a skillset - nor knowledgeset - for being able to actually really contest, nor about knowing what the contests really are about. To me, the contests are about i
Hello Everybody ! It is most refreshing to see sentiments building up right before the CQ WW SSB. I hope a great majority will have an adequate level of Steam left for the Contest itself ! Keep your
Tjänare Mats ! ('Yo Mats !' for the English reading audience) Returned from traveling. Reasonable, responsible or how one would put it. It is to play by the country's own rules. I do not know any cou
Kostas and others, Yes. The cheaters are a minority. But: This problem is more visible amongst the top performers, where the share of bad fruits is bigger. It is the same as for all competitive endea
Gents, Two Euro cents in this: 1. Most of the people behaving irrationally are absolutely not driving for a good score. Some do but I claim most do not. 2. Making a contest QSO and not deliberately n
Aye. I second Mark's view. Amount of data equals a networked device, but only with stations that are heard at the location. Very powerful tool ! And, a fair-play based rule is the Skimmers should be
Wow ! Looks good on paper. I have now some years old Bose QC2 that I like. Time has passed, maybe there really is something as good in lower price range. Looking for newer noise cancelling earphones,
All, Such complicated external HW with all related wiring is not needed. TR has a PTT/CWout delay. Also N1MM has the similar function. I still use both at my stations - depending on the operator wish
Check the feedlines. Going to real serious measures, go for a walk with the spouse or mow the lawn. That is, do also something else than sitting and logging. http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/320182/20
Pete & All, These are some of the profound questions, below the obvious ones. This discussion adds a good value to interpreting the rules. outside the 500m circle. Thus not allowed in CQ WW. If you w
Igor & All, For CQ WW, if you are in assisted singleop category (or any multiop), you can use the RBN. But for CQ WW Contest not assisted single operator categories, any usage of RBN would be conside
Hi, This discussion is valuable for people to understand the rules a bit deeper than for the obvious viewpoints that are directly written in. I really think it is Fun to share the thoughts regarding
Luckily the world is not that simple we really could measure the arrival angle. There are often more than one sky wave propagation models happening all the time if you are in ZL2. the propagation usu