Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k.alexander@rogers.com: 40 ]

Total 40 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] 80 mtr antenna (score: 1)
Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 17:24:20 -0400 (EDT)
Hi Glenn, What you're describing is a Self Contained Vertical (SCV) antenna. It uses the basic delta loop configuration but is fed part way up the side of one of the legs. They're (mostly) vertically
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00043.html (9,164 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Inspections - A Cheater Confesses (score: 1)
Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 19:11:47 -0700 (PDT)
Folks, All this talk of cheating and station inspections has been weighing heavily on my conscience these last few days. I think it's time to come clean; I'm a cheater! You see, a few weekends ago in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00299.html (10,787 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] Shack Lighting Ideas (score: 1)
Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:30:40 -0700 (PDT)
My shack came equipped with pot fixtures in the ceiling with 65 watt halogen lamps with large frosted diffusers in front when I moved in. As it turns out there's a fixture about 2 ft off each end of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-10/msg00419.html (9,614 bytes)

24. Re: [CQ-Contest] Watch your dits this weekend (score: 1)
Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:33:48 -0800 (PST)
As the holder of VE3HLS (a.k.a. VE3HLH, VE3SLS, VE3HLI and so on) I'm sure my call is a black mark in more than a few contest logs, and will be this weekend! Being QRP doesn't help either. 73 - Ken _
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00507.html (11,487 bytes)

25. Re: [CQ-Contest] "shuttle jog" devices for rig control (score: 1)
Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 04:06:16 -0800 (PST)
Hi Al, Seems like a pretty neat idea, especially if you're using a computer for many of the other control functions. Below is a link to some software for use with the Griffin PowerMate to tune a K3:
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00399.html (9,976 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why do we like our favorite contesting mode? (score: 1)
Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 17:20:18 -0800 (PST)
Interesting analysis. However, I don't see it as an indicator of the future of SSB contesting, as is hinted, because you're not looking at the levels of contest participation over time. SSB contestin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00015.html (10,493 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why do we like our favorite contesting mode? (score: 1)
Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 17:28:08 -0800 (PST)
- Get 8 hours of sleep every night (except for contest weekends) - Eat well, more vegetables, less meat - Drink in moderation - Exercise daily - Operate CW Sounds like a formula for a long life! 73 -
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00019.html (8,479 bytes)

28. Re: [CQ-Contest] Anonymity of CQWW Contest Committee Actions (score: 1)
Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 10:50:13 -0700 (PDT)
A lawsuit over a ham radio contest, what a depressing state of affairs to contemplate! I think if that day ever comes I'll sell my gear and find a more civil hobby. 73, Ken Alexander VE3HLS _________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-08/msg00208.html (9,812 bytes)

29. Re: [CQ-Contest] Conditions this weekend (score: 1)
Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 11:59:26 -0800 (PST)
Crap! I'm all set up for single band 20m this weekend! I guess I can go single band 40m instead. I should have been paying more attention but there's too much darn work to do. Thanks for the heads up
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00404.html (7,503 bytes)

30. Re: [CQ-Contest] [FCG] a little more fairness? (score: 1)
Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 19:13:58 -0800 (PST)
There was ice cream? Nobody told me there was ice cream after CQWW! Rats! 73 - Ken, VE3HLS _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lis
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00158.html (9,442 bytes)

31. Re: [CQ-Contest] Revised 2011 NAQP Rules (score: 1)
Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 14:39:06 -0800 (PST)
Geez! Am I going to need a lawyer here? I just paid my Christmas shopping bills and I can't afford a lawyer just to enter a contest. Is Legal Aid available for hams entering contests? 73, Ken Alexand
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-01/msg00073.html (14,214 bytes)

32. Re: [CQ-Contest] Revised 2011 NAQP Rules (score: 1)
Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 05:50:51 -0800 (PST)
While you guys are busy trying to save ham radio contesting by finding the perfect word to substitute for assisted I hope you won't lose sight of the fact that the contest is this weekend! I'd hate t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-01/msg00101.html (12,138 bytes)

33. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest sleep assist (score: 1)
Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 13:40:08 -0800 (PST)
Dave, Aren't you supposed to go on for a few thousand words about the possible side effects now? 8-) 73, Ken Alexander, VE3HLS _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-03/msg00016.html (9,850 bytes)

34. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC updated FAQ - Remote operation (score: 1)
Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 06:38:45 -0800 (PST)
Doug, Following your train of thought, one could easily conclude that the ARRL is out to destroy the hobby by "dumbing down" the requirements for DXCC. If that's the case then you would send them a s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-03/msg00030.html (10,027 bytes)

35. Re: [CQ-Contest] Side Effects (score: 1)
Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 17:14:33 -0800 (PST)
HHmmm...I thought it was multi-single: two operators, one, uh...umm..."rig"! 73 - Ken VE3HLS _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-03/msg00049.html (7,233 bytes)

36. Re: [CQ-Contest] CW Exchange (score: 1)
Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 12:52:29 -0500
This year's contest was unusual for me. I run 100W into an 18 ft vertical. I also have an awful callsign for CW: VE3HLS, which gets mangled into SLS, HLI, HRS and other variations. I spend a LOT of t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00519.html (11,720 bytes)

37. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Control in Contests (score: 1)
Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:14:38 -0700 (PDT)
The IOTA Contest is one contest out of hundreds, and the RSGB is one organizer out of dozens.  They can run their contest their way and the rest of 'em will run theirs how they like.  Or are you sayi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-04/msg00129.html (12,462 bytes)

38. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU Contest Rulrs. (score: 1)
Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 08:47:49 -0700 (PDT)
Forgive me for jumping in without reading everything leading up to this. To me, it looks like the use of "non-amateur means..." is an ethical lapse at worst because "inconsistent with..." doesn't exp
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-07/msg00100.html (10,193 bytes)

39. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU Contest Rules (score: 1)
Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 08:32:24 -0700 (PDT)
George, You might also want to consider a tinfoil hat to ensure you don't accidentally intercept any brainwaves from other contesters!  :-) 73, Ken Alexander VE3HLS ________________________________ F
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-07/msg00107.html (9,661 bytes)

40. Re: [CQ-Contest] shack table height - optimal for CW contesting? (score: 1)
Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 16:34:06 -0400
Jeff, You could get 100 replies and none of them might work for you because the respondents aren't you. I just spent the last half hour on the Staples and IKEA websites and height of every desk and t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-09/msg00201.html (8,977 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu