Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k1ep@arrl.net: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Operating time calculation (score: 1)
Author: Ed Parish K1EP <k1ep@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 18:13:31 -0500
After getting docked in SS for going over the 24 limit, I think I have figured out the time thing. If you have log entries for 2100Z through 2130Z, you have operated 31 minutes. Minute 1 is 2100Z, mi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00262.html (9,320 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] When does the contest end? (score: 1)
Author: Ed Parish K1EP <k1ep@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 10:45:08 -0500
I agree with Tree that you have to do this because not everyone starts the contest at 0000Z or 2100Z. If I start at 2115Z for SS, I shouldn't lose 15 minutes of my allocated 24 hour operating time. T
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00300.html (9,310 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] CQ Athens (score: 1)
Author: Ed Parish K1EP <k1ep@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 11:23:08 -0500
Any contesting hams in or near Athens, Greece, could you please contact me direct at k1ep@arrl.net . Tnx! _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00012.html (6,797 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Feb 04 QST op-ed article (score: 1)
Author: Ed Parish K1EP <k1ep@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 07:54:16 -0500
My conclusion is that we need more contests. -- The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland! THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS! http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~james
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00261.html (10,946 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] M/S band change rule in ARRL DX? (score: 1)
Author: Ed Parish K1EP <k1ep@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 08:15:41 -0500
General HF Rules: 2.3.1. Multioperator, Single Transmitter: Stations are allowed only one transmitted signal at any given time. Yes, different than CQWW -- The world's top contesters battle it out in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00350.html (8,739 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL CW DX, J6DX Pwr?? (score: 1)
Author: Ed Parish K1EP <k1ep@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 08:36:06 -0500
Cut numbers got so confusing at times that I was scratching my head late in the contest when someone sent me 5W. I kept thinking to myself, what cut number is W? Is it 51? Then I had a Homer moment..
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00390.html (9,988 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ pattern in contest - what's your vote? (score: 1)
Author: Ed Parish K1EP <k1ep@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 08:17:09 -0500
Exactly, which is why I prefer to start with the obvious, CQ and not TEST. I disagree with that. As a Low Power S&P single op, I find that if I am tuning in "mid-CQ" and all I hear is the callsign, I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00458.html (11,857 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ pattern in contest - what's your vote? (score: 1)
Author: Ed Parish K1EP <k1ep@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 15:31:17 -0500
I agree with you, but many CW machines do not leave much space after the call and the K. If you only give the call once, they you might think that the K is part of the call. I like to hear the call t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00475.html (10,624 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] 'TEST' or not to 'TEST' (score: 1)
Author: Ed Parish K1EP <k1ep@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 12:40:33 -0500
As it has been pointed out before, if I am tuning the band, I might miss your preamble. I hear your call, once, maybe twice. Are you calling someone? Are you calling CQ? Are you repeating your call a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00495.html (10,967 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] 'TEST' or not to 'TEST' (score: 1)
Author: Ed Parish K1EP <k1ep@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 22:01:59 -0500
Could be. I hadn't heard of using NV instead of TEST until today. But, if I were you, I would program in a half space between the N and V or something that so it doesn't sound like a fast TEST. -- Th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00502.html (10,146 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Phone - 40 m lack of bandplan compliance (score: 1)
Author: Ed Parish K1EP <k1ep@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 20:19:39 -0500
It just doesn't happen on 40M. I was mostly on 15M during the contest, however, I occasionally went over to the 160M station when it wasn't occupied and I was still conscious. I had to laugh at an ex
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-03/msg00140.html (9,835 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] IC7800 - (score: 1)
Author: Ed Parish K1EP <k1ep@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 09:43:44 -0500
Icom radios using the CI-V bus in the past could always be linked. I wonder if that could be done through the CI-V? Probably not, as the individual receivers don't have separate addresses and there i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-03/msg00193.html (10,347 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Shortening the Contest(s) (score: 1)
Author: Ed Parish K1EP <k1ep@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 07:06:11 -0500
With deep respect for you and your family Ellen, I think that the real point is that we need to get more younger hams interested in contesting (and in ham radio in general). At some point, we were th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-03/msg00340.html (10,300 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Check in SS (score: 1)
Author: Ed Parish K1EP <k1ep@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 12:47:32 -0500
I agree with you on this, but I can also add, that saying both will sometimes get through too. Just like changing the phonetics on your call. I prefer the single digits though. Especially those who s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00584.html (10,027 bytes)

15. [CQ-Contest] Cheating (score: 1)
Author: k1ep@arrl.net (Ed Parish K1EP)
Date: Wed Feb 5 06:09:51 2003
One can draw one of two conclusions from the above statement concerning W2SZ. Either it is a supposition or you have been able to examine the logs. If it is the former, you are speaking without knowi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-02/msg00055.html (13,539 bytes)

16. [CQ-Contest] To ID or not to ID (score: 1)
Author: k1ep@arrl.net (Ed Parish K1EP)
Date: Sat Apr 5 11:18:30 2003
I assume you are talking about CW. I would agree with you that a TU, CFM, or R should be sent. But on SSB, I think that just the call is acceptable. Information can be conveyed with the tone of your
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-04/msg00120.html (7,769 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] W2SC's ARRL DX LCR feedback (score: 1)
Author: Ed Parish K1EP <k1ep@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 09:29:00 -0400
-- The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland! THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS! http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/ -- _______________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00211.html (10,439 bytes)

18. RE: [CQ-Contest] LoTW Usage - Will you use it??? (score: 1)
Author: Ed Parish K1EP <k1ep@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 06:16:45 -0400
Doesn't it make sense that the ARRL should enter contest logs into LoTW? After all, they can verify QSOs by cross checking the logs of many of the participants. If they consider the post-UBN logs as
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00306.html (12,422 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] "Please copy my number" (score: 1)
Author: Ed Parish K1EP <k1ep@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 20:00:30 -0500
I would agree to some extent, but there were times when I got the call wrong the first time and the exchange clarified it. Having the phonetics helped. Also, I used that part of the exchange as a fil
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00239.html (10,773 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu