Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k4ww@arrl.net: 182 ]

Total 182 documents matching your query.

101. Re: [CQ-Contest] Enforceable rules (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 18:02:18 -0500
John Geiger wrote: "And what about publicly (more or less) stating that you won't enforce certain rules." Reminds me of the speed limit enforcement! Depending on what mood the enforcement official is
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00211.html (10,245 bytes)

102. Re: [CQ-Contest] K6LA Gentlemen's Agreement idea (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 06:15:42 -0500
Mark Beckwith wrote: "Ideally guys in the top-ten box who think it's okay to soak loopholes should get no respect from anyone." IMHO, it should have said: "any contest participant who thinks it's oka
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00300.html (8,156 bytes)

103. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log-checking and RST [was: cut numbers] (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 05:06:53 -0500
Ev Tupis wrote: "If your ARRL 10 Meter contest log shows a QSO with W2EV and a received RST of "59", it is a bust. Nobody got that report from me." As far as I know, most, if not all logging programs
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00009.html (7,863 bytes)

104. Re: [CQ-Contest] I don't get it...so please help me out: 160m DX (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 06:44:21 -0500
kr2q@optonline.net wrote: "I'm a decent op, but I can't seem to work any (not much) DX on 160 with qrp.I know that my antennas are not "great" but I did work DXCC (qro) in about a year including some
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00010.html (8,197 bytes)

105. Re: [CQ-Contest] cut numbers (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 05:49:41 -0500
Jimk8mr@aol.com wrote: "I did notice that EN was often interpreted as R." I fall into that group, especially when "EN" was not preceded by "5NN, TU, GM, etc". I'm curious if "EM" is interpreted as "W
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00040.html (7,614 bytes)

106. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP SSB 160m (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 13:11:00 -0500
ve3zi@yahoo.com wrote: "I understand and accept that during major international contests the whole of the band will be used for SSB, but do feel that this contest could, and should, be operated in ac
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00220.html (8,543 bytes)

107. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 49, Issue 31 (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 06:03:19 -0500
Paul J. Piercey wrote: "Personally, I really wouldn't care as long as it was consistant but, according to my interpretation of the rule stated above, you can use a different name for each contact as
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00290.html (7,828 bytes)

108. Re: [CQ-Contest] Going all the way.... (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 08:50:12 -0500
As I was told, during another discussion about advantages/disadvantages: "97% of the participants could care less about advantages/disadvantages"? The 3% has already figured out all the advantages, a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00385.html (7,872 bytes)

109. Re: [CQ-Contest] Annual Suggestion (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 18:34:18 -0500
K8MR wrote: "There are many ways to skin this cat, and one interesting possiblity is along the lines used by the DLs who sponsor the Markrothon RTTY DX contest: Eight hours on, 8 off, 8 on, 8 off and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00478.html (9,481 bytes)

110. [RTTY] 2007 Dayton RTTY Forum (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 06:26:56 -0500
Sunday, May 20 10:15-12:00 Hara Arena, Room 2. Speaker's: Ken, K1EA Ed, W0YK Ken will discuss log checking, and distinguish between myth and reality, busted/unique calls, serial numbers, and packet p
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00508.html (6,869 bytes)

111. Re: [CQ-Contest] Doug's famous Spot Remover FREE...but wait,there's more! (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 04:57:39 -0500
Doug KR2Q wrote: "During a contest (or all the time?), the spotting software should be changed so that only the PREFIX is accepted/transmitted. That way, everybody would have to copy the call on thei
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00119.html (8,700 bytes)

112. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Site Contesting Rules (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 17:48:16 -0400
Eric Hilding wrote: "Better start looking for some good deals on Harleys, Paul, 'cuz Remote Site Contesting is here to stay." Now that you mention it...gonna pick mine up, on 3/23! Maybe someday, mig
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00370.html (8,706 bytes)

113. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL REPLY - Remote Site & Contesting Rules (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 17:54:08 -0400
Remember, this is the opinion of the same person that said: "dupes should be removed from the log, prior to submission" _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Cont
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00372.html (9,561 bytes)

114. Re: [CQ-Contest] When is a QSO not a QSO? (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 05:39:03 -0400
Kelly Taylor wrote: "There are much more important issues we could discuss. Personally, I, along with the great majority, I believe 97% was the figure I was quoted, of participants don't really give
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00423.html (10,633 bytes)

115. Re: [CQ-Contest] A call to action (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 06:31:48 -0400
Hank Garretson wrote: "Just look at the CK numbers you logged in the last Sweepstakes." It has been determined, by the ARRL contest manager, that CK numbers do not represent anything, other than a "t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00492.html (8,604 bytes)

116. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Contesting (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 05:49:14 -0400
Tom Taormina wrote: "The status quo is for old fogies with no vision." "guilty as charged" C'Ya, Shelby - K4WW _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00628.html (7,247 bytes)

117. [RTTY] 2007 Dayton RTTY Forum (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 17:05:47 -0400
Please note new time and location!! Sunday, May 20 9:00-10:00 Hara Arena, Room 1. Speaker's: Ken, K1EA Ed, W0YK Ken will discuss log checking, and distinguish between myth and reality, busted/unique
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-04/msg00088.html (6,633 bytes)

118. Re: [CQ-Contest] RST as a sync [was: cut #] (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 06:37:35 -0400
w7why@verizon.net wrote: "Doubt very much if the log checkers check every report to see if it is '599' or whatever." Finally, someone with a logical approach to an otherwise illogical subject! Concen
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00053.html (8,228 bytes)

119. Re: [CQ-Contest] cut #'s (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 05:18:55 -0400
Steve Harrison wrote: "SLOW DOWN to the speed at which they call you (unless you absolutely KNOW the other op can copy at your hyper-speed). That's mere courtesy but can also save you having to repea
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00098.html (7,316 bytes)

120. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU - Join Us (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 11:25:08 -0400
Bill Turner wrote: "If they would allow RTTY, it would be perfect." I agree! However, that would do nothing to solve the "alleged" cheating situation? Best solution, for the "alleged" cheating soluti
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00291.html (7,949 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu