Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k5go@cox.net: 64 ]

Total 64 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Skimmer Rule Challenge (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <k5go@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 11:04:39 -0500
Sorry, but if the operator tunes the radio and finds stations to work, he is not receiving assistance. He is doing the job himself.. A more legitmate arguement than this one could be made to those w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00491.html (9,834 bytes)

42. [CQ-Contest] W5SUS (score: 1)
Author: "Stan Stockton" <k5go@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 08:09:02 -0500
It is with a sad heart that I report that W5SUS became a silent key last month on June 14, thirty days before his 99th birthday. John was an old timer on 160M receiving the 23rd DXCC certificate issu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00133.html (8,639 bytes)

43. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL and Open Logs - Time for the next step? (score: 1)
Author: "Stan Stockton" <k5go@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:07:36 -0500
Have not read much of this but generally agree with W4TV and K0HB on this subject. I don't think LOTW will allow you to print out a chronological log for someone else's contesting effort. Making the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00281.html (9,766 bytes)

44. Re: [CQ-Contest] I've heard it all now! (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <k5go@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 23:36:28 -0500
The 2nd harmonic thing is very real. In years past I have personally heard some of the big guys on 160M as loud as S8 on the meter exactly double their TX frequency on 160M. You go down to 160M and f
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00237.html (11,026 bytes)

45. Re: [CQ-Contest] I've heard it all now! (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <k5go@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 18:47:52 -0500
Ron, If someone in the midwest will put their SDR with Skimmer on 3650, covering plus/minus about 48 Khz from that frequency during the CQ 160M Contest, everyone will be able to see the results - a n
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00289.html (14,042 bytes)

46. [CQ-Contest] Wearon F1 Icephobic Coating (score: 1)
Author: "Stan Stockton" <k5go@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 11:47:16 -0600
I have been away from the internet for the last week and just now going through e-mails after returning home. I know the sick feeling you have when something like this happens. It has happened to me
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00469.html (10,573 bytes)

47. Re: [CQ-Contest] Wearon F1 Icephobic Coating (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <k5go@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 05:58:04 -0800
Bob, I believe the paint is used on commercial towers - perhaps more often than on antennas. It is slick stuff. However, I have not painted a tower with it to tell you whether it causes a concern. My
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00480.html (13,336 bytes)

48. Re: [CQ-Contest] Wearon F1 Icephobic Coating (score: 1)
Author: "Stan Stockton" <k5go@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:51:45 -0500
Bill, I thought the same thing about airplanes particularly after the incident near Buffalo. One would think that this material or some variation of it would prevent ice build up on the wings. Surely
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00159.html (9,532 bytes)

49. [CQ-Contest] Categories, Participation and Competition (score: 1)
Author: "Stan Stockton" <k5go@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 09:17:05 -0500
Attempts have been made in some contests to create new categories where ones with wires or tribanders can compete on a more level basis. Most contests have categories for different power levels. The
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00213.html (8,156 bytes)

50. Re: [CQ-Contest] Categories, Participation and Competition (score: 1)
Author: "Stan Stockton" <k5go@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 20:03:06 -0500
Once you start making limited time categories, you also have to define them. Is it 12 hours consecutive? Any 12 hours? If so, then what is an off time? It is not as simple as it may first seem. As I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00245.html (9,258 bytes)

51. Re: [CQ-Contest] Five DQ's Mark 2008 CQ WW SSB (score: 1)
Author: "Stan Stockton" <k5go@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 09:05:52 -0500
I am not a log checker but am interested in how this works. I can only assume that if someone made 6400 contacts and by mistake had twelve 10 minute rule violations the thing to do would be to submit
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-07/msg00227.html (12,242 bytes)

52. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it time to reevaluate CQWW Scoring Rules? (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <k5go@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 20:06:41 -0600
Bob, I'm sure rules could be tweaked if a new contest were started. I just was suggesting a DX contest and not turn it into another SS. While true that there are a lot of Europeans in close proximity
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00273.html (11,782 bytes)

53. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cut number "J" and NO Power Sent (score: 1)
Author: "Stan Stockton" <k5go@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:50:53 -0600
Unless his VOX was set to drop out after the RST was sent, this might not happen. I think Randy should settle this once and for all by calling the guy on the phone and asking him what he was trying t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00334.html (10,210 bytes)

54. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Contest logging question (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <k5go@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 04:52:15 -0600
Open the Cabrillo file with Notepad and change it to whatever you want before you send it in? Stan, K5GO Sent from Stan's IPhone _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing lis
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00128.html (8,210 bytes)

55. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Calls (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <k5go@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 05:07:26 -0800
Jeff, I don't read where it says the holder of the call sign has to be present. I think he just has to take equal responsibility for the operation of the station. "When the control operator is a diff
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00315.html (11,295 bytes)

56. Re: [CQ-Contest] A new "DX cluster" experience for contesters (score: 1)
Author: "Stan Stockton" <k5go@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 11:48:15 -0500
Paul, Obviously there is no way to stop technology from advancing or to keep people from writing software and developing systems that will eventually automate the contest experience. Within a few yea
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00229.html (15,052 bytes)

57. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is RBN allowed? (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <k5go@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 08:16:48 -0500
YES Just quickly reading rules on IPhone, #4 under Single Operator Assisted says "qso alerting assistance is allowed (this includes, but is not limited to, packet, local or remote skimmer and/or skim
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-09/msg00185.html (12,338 bytes)

58. Re: [CQ-Contest] K8DD (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <k5go@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 21:03:39 -0600
Very sad to hear. I operated a couple of times at K8CC with Hank. He was a good guy who will be missed. Stan, K5GO Sent from Stan's IPhone _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00263.html (7,911 bytes)

59. Re: [CQ-Contest] Mult passing: is it okay to use? (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <k5go@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 07:09:57 -0600
Frank, Multiplier passing, in every category of entry is a technique employed by every winner. Every successful entry will ask a station to QSY to another band when it is likely they will not work th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-01/msg00273.html (11,690 bytes)

60. Re: [CQ-Contest] Level Playing Field - my 2 cents (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <k5go@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 19:05:27 -0500
Doug, The problem with this thread is the title. So many are correct in that there will never be a level playing field. I don't think anyone wants to do well versus someone else because of a handicap
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-06/msg00192.html (15,641 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu