Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k7lxc@aol.com: 365 ]

Total 365 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Contest Results on the Web (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Fri Jan 11 20:51:18 2002
it's Wow - I couldn't agree more. I remember the 'good ole days' when Mark Wilson was a skinny, young sprout of a contester. His QST SS write-ups were FABULOUS because they had station comparisons, p
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00224.html (7,834 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] QST vs. NCJ vs. CQ (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Sat Jan 12 23:15:39 2002
they Shrewd? I don't think that's a term that's ever been used to describe anyone in the amateur radio publishing business. I'll just throw this on the fire. CQ magazine reluctantly publishes contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00267.html (8,032 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] What has happened to our hobby? (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Sat Jan 12 23:17:30 2002
Okay - I give up. What are they? Statements like that with no data to back them up are pretty worthless. Cheers, Steve K7LXC -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrat
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00268.html (7,893 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] QST vs. NCJ vs. CQ (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Sun Jan 13 10:36:29 2002
Au contraire. I was a contributing editor to CQ Contest magazine for its entire existence and have had hundreds of phone conversations with the editor of that magazine as well as CQ Communications st
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00275.html (8,003 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] QST vs. NCJ vs. CQ (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Sun Jan 13 12:33:23 2002
CQ market research? That's a good one. (They do have reader responses regarding articles now but that's a fairly recent development.) Gee, I forgot it was so simple. Please remember that the CQWW has
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00279.html (8,615 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] Contesting, Ham Radio and the Internet (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Sun Jan 13 16:45:28 2002
The POINT is that these are the kids that used to get into ham radio and now they aren't. They're exactly the same when it comes to fascinating eager, bright and COMPETITIVE kids. Sorry - they ARE th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00288.html (14,819 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] Contest Annual (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Sun Jan 13 22:05:19 2002
Sure - I'll buy one. Sounds FB to me. Then I can throw away/unsubscribe from CQ magazine. Cheers, Steve K7LXC -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00307.html (7,649 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] Contest Annual (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Sun Jan 13 22:11:59 2002
So we're back to a website for useful, timely info. It meets ALL of the criteria. Cheers, Steve K7LXC -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00308.html (8,059 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] Re: [FCG] QST editing decisions (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Sun Jan 20 13:08:49 2002
I totally agree with your observations, particularly about the amount of pages devoted to construction articles of highly complicated (IMO - I'm not an EE), extremely narrow appeal devices. I'm reall
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00393.html (11,183 bytes)

10. [CQ-Contest] Boys' Life (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Mon Jan 21 12:25:20 2002
Yes, to emails sent directly to him. I was referring to the fact that those guys don't subscribe to and read the cq-contest reflector like you and I do. Cheers, Steve K7LXC -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00418.html (6,888 bytes)

11. [CQ-Contest] Re: [FCG] Is copying an exchange important on "the phone"? (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Mon Jan 21 12:21:46 2002
procedures... In my way of thinking, this should be the SECOND book. The first should be some kind of feature book that gets the competition, the challenge, the magic of contesting across to the read
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00419.html (11,448 bytes)

12. [CQ-Contest] Contest Cookbook (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Wed Jan 23 10:30:48 2002
My "Building A One-Tower Station" article is right up this alley. I'd be happy to contribute it. Cheers, Steve K7LXC Tower Tech -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00465.html (7,446 bytes)

13. [CQ-Contest] Time to Get Off the Pot (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Wed Jan 23 10:32:38 2002
Wow! You mean people actually READ and BUILD from those articles? Amazing. Cheers, Steve K7LXC Tower Tech -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00466.html (8,738 bytes)

14. [CQ-Contest] Re: [book] Target market? (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Wed Jan 23 18:09:41 2002
These are good topics for contesters but I think we need to define who our target market is. IMO it's the person who's never operated a contest before or has dabbled a little bit in a couple and want
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00488.html (8,262 bytes)

15. [CQ-Contest] Re: [book] call for chapter ideas (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Wed Jan 23 17:58:47 2002
The first chapter or two needs to address the history, challenges, magic, and reasons why of contesting. IMO this is THE most important chapter. Cheers, Steve K7LXC -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00489.html (6,995 bytes)

16. [CQ-Contest] Re: [book] Target market? (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Thu Jan 24 11:10:14 2002
Right - you really need a mentor. Many contesters started sitting next to a good op during a multi-op effort, even Field Day. That's when they saw how it all worked and how FUN it was. Graduates of s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00523.html (7,676 bytes)

17. [CQ-Contest] What the ARRL Board did (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Thu Jan 24 11:13:43 2002
Why? Your post was thoughtful and on target IMO. If anyone on this reflector DOES send you hate mail, I'd like to hear about it. Cheers, Steve K7LXC TowerTalk Administrator, one of the www.contesting
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00529.html (7,964 bytes)

18. [CQ-Contest] Re: [ DAKOTA-HAM ] The Mother of all Public Service Demonstr... (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Fri Jan 25 09:12:49 2002
There is no question that the best OPERATORS are contesters. They know how to organize things, make decisions on the fly, and actually get stuff done - specifically communcating and exchanging inform
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00554.html (8,193 bytes)

19. [CQ-Contest] [book] parameters (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Fri Jan 25 11:57:31 2002
I think that someone or something should 'own' the book and actually make a small profit on it. The profit could be used to 1) advertise and promote the books availability , i.e. banner ads on www.co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00563.html (8,977 bytes)

20. [CQ-Contest] Emergency Contest (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Fri Jan 25 12:06:35 2002
I think you've come up with a wonderful idea in which I would participate. The goals of 1) getting lots of hams involved in a 'demonstration' emergency/competitive event which would raise the visibil
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00566.html (7,476 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu