Mail Archive Search: <+from:k7ss@wolfenet.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:k7ss@wolfenet.com: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] signing portable QRP (score: 1): Author: k7ss@wolfenet.com (Eskenazi/Leveque); Date: Tue Mar 3 23:27:36 1998; ....a small suggestion that might make some sense....during those QSOs in a contest that one feels compelled to let it be known he is running QRP.. (for whatever reason).. sending a "/Q" as opposed t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-03/msg00064.html (6,915 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Two contests within a contest? (score: 1): Author: k7ss@wolfenet.com (Eskenazi/Leveque); Date: Fri Mar 6 22:20:29 1998; DX0DX and another guy XX0XX are running Ws. Its the ARRL test and 15 is wide open to the west coast. Scene One: "DX0DX... contest" (W6 garbled...) "W6.. 59 kilowatt" (roger its W6XXX 59 Cal) "DX0DX..; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-03/msg00107.html (8,778 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Two contests within a contest? (score: 1): Author: k7ss@wolfenet.com (Eskenazi/Leveque); Date: Sat Mar 7 10:10:27 1998; What is the CQWWCC definition of a "QSO"? We have seen the definition from ARRL. (and many are NOT meeting that definition) And what is the definition from the FCC? ..and is that germaine to this thr; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-03/msg00115.html (9,359 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] "two contests..." etc (score: 1): Author: k7ss@wolfenet.com (Eskenazi/Leveque); Date: Mon Mar 9 07:59:57 1998; It seems that I was a little ambiguous in my note about DX0DX etc: 1. DX0DX is a made up call...not meant to imply anyone in the contest, same with XX0XX. 2. My point is not a condemnation of either; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-03/msg00130.html (7,384 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] 2 letter callsigns (score: 1): Author: k7ss@wolfenet.com (Eskenazi/Leveque); Date: Thu Mar 12 21:20:04 1998; I think that applies. -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-03/msg00242.html (6,480 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] contest SHOOTOUT! (score: 1): Author: k7ss@wolfenet.com (Eskenazi/Leveque); Date: Thu Apr 2 22:12:05 1998; KK7GW is right on in seeing the need for an annual (semiannual?) shootout that features "TREY vs TY" and a host of other events. 6 years was way too long to wait between 1990 in Seattle and 1996 in S; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-04/msg00034.html (7,639 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] HERE HERE!!!! (score: 1): Author: k7ss@wolfenet.com (Eskenazi/Leveque); Date: Wed Apr 15 02:13:10 1998; Lew you are SO RIGHT ON!!! The need exists for: 1. Non W1-2-3 geographic dominance of yet another contest. 2. Those very same hot shot W1-2-3 operators to prove to the rest of us that are indeed cham; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-04/msg00227.html (7,230 bytes)
8. [CQ-Contest] QSL card from Hong Kong (score: 1): Author: k7ss@wolfenet.com (Eskenazi/Leveque); Date: Wed Nov 4 01:15:54 1998; I think the QSLing habits questions belong on "CQ-ThatguyisrippingmyIRCsoffandbuildingaconteststation", not "CQ-Contest". Lighten up please. 73 de K7SS Contesting is a hobby QSLing is another hobby -; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-11/msg00055.html (6,610 bytes)
9. [CQ-Contest] Contesting and HAARP (score: 1): Author: k7ss@wolfenet.com (Eskenazi/Leveque); Date: Sun Mar 16 09:39:13 1997; At the WWDXC post meeting bull session last night, someone mentioned having listened to the HAARP transmission test on 6.990 last Saturday night. He said here in Seattle it was "62 db over s 9". Have; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-03/msg00216.html (7,377 bytes)
10. [CQ-Contest] WPX..... rules...schmoools (score: 1): Author: k7ss@wolfenet.com (Eskenazi/Leveque); Date: Thu Apr 17 23:15:47 1997; I used to like the WPX...........and then they screwed with the rules. -- Eskenazi/Leveque k7ss@wolfenet.com -- -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: c; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-04/msg00230.html (6,522 bytes)
11. [CQ-Contest] Dayton? (score: 1): Author: k7ss@wolfenet.com (Eskenazi/Leveque); Date: Tue May 20 22:00:02 1997; Did not read one report on Dayton on here. Those of us who didnt make it would delight in hearing about the contesting forums, banquet, hospital(ity) suites, etc. and hey! who found something cool at; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-05/msg00158.html (7,098 bytes)
12. [CQ-Contest] Ginseng test (score: 1): Author: k7ss@wolfenet.com (Eskenazi/Leveque); Date: Fri Aug 15 00:02:30 1997; Mike, That study was done during the 1971 SSB Sweepstakes out here in Seattle. The participants were K7VPF (now K7JA) W7EXM (SK K7RA) and yours truly K7JCA. We were all given measured dosages of gins; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-08/msg00060.html (8,045 bytes)
13. [CQ-Contest] Ginseng test (score: 1): Author: k7ss@wolfenet.com (Eskenazi/Leveque); Date: Fri Aug 15 00:02:30 1997; Mike, That study was done during the 1971 SSB Sweepstakes out here in Seattle. The participants were K7VPF (now K7JA) W7EXM (SK K7RA) and yours truly K7JCA. We were all given measured dosages of gins; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-08/msg00173.html (8,015 bytes)
14. [CQ-Contest] Ginseng test (score: 1): Author: k7ss@wolfenet.com (Eskenazi/Leveque); Date: Fri Aug 15 00:02:30 1997; Mike, That study was done during the 1971 SSB Sweepstakes out here in Seattle. The participants were K7VPF (now K7JA) W7EXM (SK K7RA) and yours truly K7JCA. We were all given measured dosages of gins; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-08/msg00284.html (8,027 bytes)
15. temporary address (score: 1): Author: Danny Eskenazi <k7ss@wolfenet.com> (Danny Eskenazi); Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:24 2005; I will be using "k7ss@aloha.net" til mid march will try to work a few in the SSB Sprint tmrw. It will be like sitting in the high rows in the end zone and trying to see the action. Of course some hav; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00036.html (6,030 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]