Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k8dd@arrl.net: 75 ]

Total 75 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] REALLY Annoying trend (score: 1)
Author: Hank Kohl K8DD <k8dd@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 17:11:49 -0500
With the trend to cut numbers ..... and they should migrate to SS .... guess I'll change from the dreaded 58 to 55 ...... make that check EE Now THAT would be a REALLY annoying trend! 73 Hank K8DD __
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00298.html (8,597 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] Maximum Time Limit for S/O (score: 1)
Author: "hank k8dd" <k8dd@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 21:31:20 +0000
Yes .... Please ..... Let's have some more regulation to take care of us because everyone knows that we can't take care of ourselves ..... we don't have enough sense to come in out of the rain ......
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00318.html (8,219 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] Maximum Time Limit for S/O (score: 1)
Author: "hank k8dd" <k8dd@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 22:05:09 +0000
Yes .... Please ..... Let's have some more regulation to take care of us because everyone knows that we can't take care of ourselves ..... we don't have enough sense to come in out of the rain ......
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00320.html (8,108 bytes)

24. Re: [CQ-Contest] M/S rule in ARRL DX (score: 1)
Author: "hank k8dd" <k8dd@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 12:14:21 -0500
Which makes it great for a two man expedition like AC8W and I do. You don't really have to worry about the second station and/or antennas for it. 73 Hank K8DD 'Never argue with an idiot. They drag yo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00456.html (7,749 bytes)

25. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sprint Results (score: 1)
Author: "hank k8dd" <k8dd@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 20:40:51 +0000
I received my Jan/Feb 2007 issue. Volume 35 Number 1 Fall NAQP and Sprint Results Issue 73 Hank K8DD -- 'Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level then beat you with experience.' -
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00356.html (10,255 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] Circle Jerks (score: 1)
Author: "hank k8dd" <k8dd@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 20:57:46 -0400
-- In ARRL contests there is a second option to the circle. According to http://www.arrl.org/contests/cc.html Unlimited and Medium clubs have the choice of the circle or section. " All stations and a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-05/msg00286.html (9,434 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] QST contesting issue idea (score: 1)
Author: "hank k8dd" <k8dd@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 17:40:57 -0400
It's all down to the "bean counters". Where can they make the most money for the column inch! 73 Hank K8DD -- 'Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level then beat you with experien
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00270.html (8,573 bytes)

28. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU - Join Us (score: 1)
Author: "hank k8dd" <k8dd@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 16:01:03 -0400
And on 80M put RTTY back above 3600? 73 Hank K8DD -- 'Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level then beat you with experience.' -anon -- ___________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00299.html (8,845 bytes)

29. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU - Join Us (score: 1)
Author: "hank k8dd" <k8dd@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 16:31:00 -0400
And ..... RTTY ops generally (notice I said generally, not always or usually) don't listen aurally to a frequency - it's kinda like they don't see much on their little display and they just plop thei
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00334.html (10,316 bytes)

30. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU - Join Us (score: 1)
Author: "hank k8dd" <k8dd@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 22:32:14 -0400
As part of the "CW rabble" I guess I should have been more explicit ..... Let me rephrase it: "And ..... RTTY ops generally (notice I said generally, not always, or usually, or most or nearly all, or
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00344.html (10,956 bytes)

31. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY "Listening" (score: 1)
Author: "hank k8dd" <k8dd@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 23:46:27 -0400
73 Hank K8DD -- 'Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level then beat you with experience.' -anon -- _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00378.html (9,864 bytes)

32. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R REMOTE CONTESTING (score: 1)
Author: "hank k8dd" <k8dd@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 17:15:17 -0400
I've had my K2/100 on my LAN using the K2 remote & server software. Even on a 100MB LAN the delay is, as Tree says, unacceptable except for a FD type operation! And ..... there is absolutely nothing
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00444.html (9,159 bytes)

33. Re: [CQ-Contest] Operation times in WWDX (score: 1)
Author: "hank k8dd" <k8dd@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 13:39:08 -0400
I can understand the analysis ..... And I can agree with "half-marathon" and "contest within the contest" But I like being able to pick when I want to operate within the 48 hour timeframe of the cont
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00488.html (9,057 bytes)

34. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL International DX CW Scores Posted (score: 1)
Author: "hank k8dd" <k8dd@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 14:00:58 -0400
And fine results they are! I was looking through the Multi Single scores and found one that really looked strange 78 OH2K 32 0 318 MS That's 32 points Zero QSO's and 318 Multipliers. How do you do th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00059.html (7,476 bytes)

35. Re: [CQ-Contest] W1AW/4 contest QTH? (score: 1)
Author: "hank k8dd" <k8dd@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 20:48:27 -0400
Last year NU1AW/8 was in OH and MI at K8AZ, K8CC & N8CC. 73 Hank K8DD -- 'Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level then beat you with experience.' -anon -- _______________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00252.html (9,096 bytes)

36. Re: [CQ-Contest] printing QSO info directly onto QSLs: hw? (score: 1)
Author: "hank k8dd" <k8dd@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 15:36:58 -0400
BV Label Management, DXbase and Logger32 all do a good job printing the whole card or just the information on the card. There are probably more, but I like BV better - it takes your ADIF file and you
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-09/msg00013.html (8,627 bytes)

37. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW CW 2007 Result W2/NP3D - I just did not getit. (score: 1)
Author: "hank k8dd" <k8dd@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 12:10:23 -0400
I don't think you should use the number of QSO's as the determining factor ..... You should be using QSO Points, which can make the difference in the score. 73 Hank K8DD -- 'Never argue with an idiot
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-09/msg00018.html (7,928 bytes)

38. Re: [CQ-Contest] Low band antenna question (score: 1)
Author: "hank k8dd" <k8dd@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 16:31:18 -0400
I would agree with Joe ..... I had a Voyager up for about 5 years in a 1 acre field. Real good on 40 Pretty decent on 80 Poor on 160 - both RX and TX I've had much better luck on 160 with a loaded 1/
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-09/msg00122.html (9,643 bytes)

39. Re: [CQ-Contest] CWSS and daylight savings time (score: 1)
Author: "hank k8dd" <k8dd@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 16:46:30 -0400
That's true if you don't have your logging computer set to UTC (Monrovia time zone so there is no DST adjustment). 73 Hank K8DD -- 'Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level then b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-09/msg00255.html (10,965 bytes)

40. Re: [CQ-Contest] CWSS and daylight savings time (score: 1)
Author: "hank k8dd" <k8dd@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 15:48:55 -0400
But the log-checked scores won't be posted until after DST comes into effect in the spring and the log checking software will remove one hour from your log. 73 & tongue in cheek -- 'Never argue with
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-09/msg00288.html (10,424 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu