Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:kamham69@gmail.com: 170 ]

Total 170 documents matching your query.

101. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dupes (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 09:08:12 -0500
Here is the problem with sending QSO B4. Lets assume I have your call wrong in my log - that would be the only reason to call you a second time. I then get a QSO B4, but I have NO idea when I worked
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00319.html (10,593 bytes)

102. Re: [CQ-Contest] The "high and mighty" syndrome on display (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 18:22:36 -0500
Running QRP or QRO is not the issue. I think we have both been around long enough to know that running QRO does not guarantee a big signal on the other end, nor does running QRP guarantee a weak sig
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00380.html (11,032 bytes)

103. Re: [CQ-Contest] What's the difference... (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 14:31:22 -0500
Hi Art Its a pretty simple concept - copy what is sent OVER THE AIR, and that is what goes in your log. Once your log is submitted to the contest sponsor, change whatever you like in your own log. A
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-01/msg00068.html (9,662 bytes)

104. Re: [CQ-Contest] More on Mar vs NB NS and PE. (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:04:35 -0500
I don't have a dog in this fight - great discussion though! But - I must question this comment. If there are other ON stations on, does this mean "meh - don't bother - there will always be someone e
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-01/msg00237.html (7,925 bytes)

105. [CQ-Contest] Ontario QSO Party - April 18 - April 19 (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 19:22:13 -0400
Come to the Ontario QSO Party on *Saturday, April 18 and Sunday April 19* - Everyone's invited! Exchange is S/P/C (out-of province) or Ontario county (in-province). Complete Rules and other informati
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00097.html (7,036 bytes)

106. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW CW 2014 TO7A. (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 00:06:53 -0400
Before anyone starts throwing rocks at Randy, we need to remember he is not working alone on reviewing logs. There are a number of top ops that are part of the contest committee. My expectation would
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00147.html (11,928 bytes)

107. [CQ-Contest] OQP Log Submittal Deadline (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 18:32:54 -0400
Last call for logs for the 2015 Ontario QSO Party. The deadline is tomorrow May 19th at 23:59Z. Electronic Cabrillo logs can be submitted through the OQP Log submittal Page at: http://va3cco.com/oqp/
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00435.html (7,228 bytes)

108. Re: [CQ-Contest] Proposed rules changes (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 13:08:56 -0400
I am gong to read between the lines, and I will be the first to admit this is a guess on my part. This is aimed at folks with TOP 10 World scores. Not the "Boy and his radio" class entrant. By having
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00484.html (11,491 bytes)

109. Re: [CQ-Contest] Level Playing Field and Geography (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 22:15:13 -0400
This is interesting and is similar to the issue that NQ4I has raised for several years now. Namely, that he is too far south to be competitive in a DX contest where working Europe is a must. FWIW: ev
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00651.html (13,112 bytes)

110. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 20:41:08 -0400
Hi Jukka You logged the QSO based on what happened over the air - job done. No point in making changes after the fact, and you certainly did the right thing. I would have done the same. For someone t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00029.html (9,521 bytes)

111. Re: [CQ-Contest] When is it OK to refuse to give out a QSO? (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 09:33:06 -0400
Hi John Please keep in mind why you decided to play radio in the first place - namely - to have FUN. At the same time, you run into people of all types. Some don't like contesters, some have read (or
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00167.html (11,444 bytes)

112. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log dupes in SS (or any 'Test) (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 22:55:40 -0500
Thanks for bringing this up. There were several folks sending "QSO B4", and I am not sure what the purpose of it was. Clearly, EVERYONE is using computerized logging these days, and if one person dec
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-11/msg00161.html (9,196 bytes)

113. Re: [CQ-Contest] High Rate Dual Radio CQing (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 06:32:55 -0400
drastically different than it is today and the "unassisted" Sadly, this is already not the case. Look at what packet has done: get spotted - instant pileup. Busted packet spot - instant pileup of lo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00346.html (15,763 bytes)

114. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Survey results - part 1 (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 13:44:12 -0500
Hi Marty Glad to see there are some young contesters here. Please don't focus on things others are doing wrong like "Please copy..." We all learn from our mistakes, and we get better through practice
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00399.html (15,391 bytes)

115. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting Popularity (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 13:20:20 -0500
And the problem is - non contesters came to *expect* QRM free operation. For a few years there were lots of "You're interfering with a net!!" type comments when running on phone. Thankfully - no so m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00510.html (12,145 bytes)

116. Re: [CQ-Contest] Absurd Rule in NAQP (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 10:02:16 -0500
I expect one of the goals (among other things) of the NAQP is to serve as a training ground for new ops: to learn to run for example. But - they also need to learn how to find stations to work *witho
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-01/msg00141.html (13,096 bytes)

117. Re: [CQ-Contest] Absurd Rule in NAQP (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 09:12:39 -0500
Hi Pete There is more to this than getting on and out of a pileup quickly. Assuming everyone followed - and was able to master your technique of getting in/out fast - before the pileup forms, that wo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-01/msg00160.html (13,723 bytes)

118. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW 160 CW: Early Hours Suggestion (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2016 13:15:20 -0500
I think there is more to it. First off, at the start of the contest, EVERY QSO is a new mult. So - NA works NA, EU works EU - lots of mults for everyone. Trying to find/work PJ2T, or any other Carrib
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-01/msg00215.html (12,312 bytes)

119. Re: [CQ-Contest] Working Split In A Contest Is Verboten! (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 20:56:13 -0500
I think there are times when good judgement and common sense need to be taken into account, and there are times when running split is the only way to manage things. I worked 4W/K1YC, and had he NOT b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00123.html (13,483 bytes)

120. Re: [CQ-Contest] Open Letter to VE Contesters (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 22:52:22 -0500
I would suggest that if you want a level playing field - mano-a-mano - the opportunity will be available a few years from now in DL land. Will be interesting to see if YOU qualify to be there. I expe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00214.html (10,506 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu