CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Survey results - part 1

To: Marty s <0246811@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Survey results - part 1
From: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 13:44:12 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Hi Marty

Glad to see there are some young contesters here.

Please don't focus on things others are doing wrong like "Please copy..."
We all learn from our mistakes, and we get better through practice and
participation.

Having fun is what it is all about, and that would be the message I suggest
you pass along to your friends.  Contesting IS fun, and things better
better the more they participate.  As they emulate what they see and hear
others doing, the "please copy" will gradually disappear without them even
being aware of it.


Tom - VE3CX




On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Marty s <0246811@gmail.com> wrote:

> I agree, I spend a lot of my time getting more young hams involved. I am
> 13, and am fairly active in the contests. There are plenty of young kids
> getting into the hobby, but not anywhere as many into contesting. I know
> close to 45 kids in the hobby, and maybe 5 are into contesting somewhat,
> and only 3 of us, care enough to keep the butt in the chair, or have a hint
> of skill (Don't make me tell you about the kids who start all exchanges
> with "Please copy":) I think if we target the kids in the hobby who are
> really seriously interested, and give the resources, there will be more
> contesting young people. I know I wound not know much about contesting
> without all of my Elmers in the YCCC, or being invited to a multi-multi
> during CQ WW this year. Just my 2 cents.
>
>
> Marty
>
> This email may contain confidential and/or privileged information.  If
>
> you are not the intended recipient, or if you have received this email
>
> in error, then please notify the sender immediately and destroy this email.
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Michael Schulz <
> mschulz@creative-chaos.com
> > wrote:
>
> > Interesting results which show that if you want to be successful, be
> closer
> > to or in Europe :).
> >
> > Regarding the age distribution, I see this concern all the time that
> there
> > are declining numbers based on age
> > and that amateur radio will be dead when the last old hams died. This
> seems
> > to be always then be tied to
> > youth not coming into the hobby at a higher rate. How about a different
> > lens
> > in which one would look at influx
> > of new hams regardless of age? Do we need 90% (making an extreme example)
> > of
> > new hams to be <18 years old?
> > Especially in contesting, the 40+ age group (I find myself in that
> bracket)
> > would seem more likely to engage in
> > contesting as new-comers given that by that time in life, things have
> > settled more overall, and disposable income
> > is (ideally) greater as compared to the 16 - 20 or 20 - 30 age brackets.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > 73 Mike K5TRI
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf
> > > Of David Gilbert
> > > Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 9:49 PM
> > > To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> > > Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Survey results - part 1
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I don't find the age distribution to be surprising at all.  Age data
> from
> > the All
> > > Asian contest exchange looks similar.  Look at the pictures from Dayton
> > or
> > > any club meeting and compare them to pictures taken 30 years ago ...
> > pretty
> > > much all you see are people that are 30 years older.
> > >
> > > Somebody I was speaking to once claimed that the average age of ham
> radio
> > > ops in the U.S. increased at least one year every 1.5 years. Seems
> about
> > right
> > > to me.
> > >
> > > 73,
> > > Dave  AB7E
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 12/16/2015 5:41 PM, Randy Thompson K5ZD wrote:
> > > > There is a new blog post with the first results from the CQ WW
> Contest
> > > > survey that was open during September 2015.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > http://cqww.com/blog/2015-cq-ww-survey-results-part-1/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > This first post cover demographic information about the responses.
> > > > The most striking finding is how old we are!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Comments and discussion are welcome.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Randy, K5ZD
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > > > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>