CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Survey results - part 1

To: k9yc@arrl.net
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Survey results - part 1
From: Marty s <0246811@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 21:42:01 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
It can be pretty annoying. I did the math today. If you were running a 250
hour, and every station added a "please copy" your rate would be down by
over 20 stations, it adds up.
Marty
KC1CWF


Marty

This email may contain confidential and/or privileged information.  If

you are not the intended recipient, or if you have received this email

in error, then please notify the sender immediately and destroy this email.




On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
wrote:

> On Fri,12/18/2015 11:26 AM, Fred - NA2U wrote:
>
>> Its use in traffic-handling not withstanding,
>>
>
> Back in the day, I handled a LOT of traffic, and "please copy" was never
> in my vocabulary. It's a LIDISM. Period.
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>