[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Survey results - part 1

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Survey results - part 1
From: Bob Poortinga <ng9m@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 12:06:44 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Herb Schoenbohm KV4FZ writes:

> When you add to this the many stations that say "roger" (an improper
> CB import for "over" that just does not go away) the Q rate is even further
> diminished. Why can't the response be solely limited to what the contest
> requires?

I would like to call Herb's attention to the General Rules for All
ARRL Contests:

"3.2.All callsigns and exchange information must be sent, received,
ACKNOWLEDGED and logged correctly by each station for a complete QSO."

"Roger", "QSL", or some other form of acknowledgement is REQUIRED.

73 de Bob NG9M
CQ-Contest mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>