Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:kamham69@gmail.com: 170 ]

Total 170 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ 160m SSB contest (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 11:10:57 -0500
Please keep in mind that bandplans are designed for NORMAL loading/day to day activities on a band. A contest introduces considerably more activity, so bandplans kinda go out the window for major con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00575.html (8,323 bytes)

82. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Free Weekend (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 10:42:45 -0400
Perhaps we should just surprize them with a quiet weekend.... Will totally throw them off balance :-) Tom - VE3CX _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00321.html (6,891 bytes)

83. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is the wpx a prefix test or dx contest? (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 18:18:51 -0400
Lets see what you are REALLY suggesting: The rules ain't fair, you can't win no matter how hard you try, So LETS CHANGE THE RULES!! YAAYY I WON!!! Give us all a break. I can't win either - does that
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-05/msg00081.html (18,212 bytes)

84. [CQ-Contest] Fwd: CQ WW Rules Changes (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 21:42:05 -0400
I was at the presentation, and the thinking was that the top operators try very hard to get everything right. One busted QSO can (and has) made the difference between first/second place, so accuracy
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-05/msg00211.html (11,275 bytes)

85. Re: [CQ-Contest] Crowne Plaza 2014 (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 06:22:58 -0400
I also have a very pleasant stay, and will be staying there again next year. The other thing I would add, is that when I was there in 2011, there was lots of complaints after both the Topband and Con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-05/msg00303.html (17,262 bytes)

86. Re: [CQ-Contest] A Ladder up Everest (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 06:59:19 -0400
The ladder to help make it easier to install your antenna at the top of the world :-) Tom - VE3CX _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com htt
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-05/msg00304.html (9,109 bytes)

87. Re: [CQ-Contest] When is speed not speedy? (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 17:01:40 -0400
This an interesting thread. One of the interesting observations made at this years CTU was along the lines of "A lot of the serious folks will end up working a good percentage of the serious folks".
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-05/msg00423.html (11,265 bytes)

88. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logs - Upload don't email (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 08:12:03 -0400
Hi Frank One thing to always look for is the confirmation email from the robot. That makes sure they got it, and if you don't receive confirmation, try again. Small consolation after the fact - I fel
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00131.html (8,736 bytes)

89. Re: [CQ-Contest] [FCG] CQ WW Rules and SCP (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 21:15:45 -0400
My understanding is the examples you are using are fine to correct the log, since it is based on information *transmitted over the air*. What is not OK is to use external data (not passed over the ai
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00197.html (12,600 bytes)

90. [CQ-Contest] CQWW Stories Wanted (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 19:03:42 -0400
I will be taking care of writing the post-contest summary for the CQWW Contest, so it you have any interesting stories about how things went, please pass them along. I will be looking at the 3830 arc
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-10/msg00211.html (7,493 bytes)

91. Re: [CQ-Contest] Whither Africa? (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:51:55 -0400
Hi Charly I think you bring up a good point that is being overlooked. I remember hearing about a QSO from a friend who was chattting with a "rare" one some years ago. To help put things in perspectiv
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-10/msg00232.html (12,802 bytes)

92. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why? (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 19:51:32 -0500
In the Sweepstakes, you need to send *your* call as part of the exchange. I know it would be a major change - the exchange would become longer, rates would go down - BUT - they you would have a good
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00418.html (10,301 bytes)

93. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Rules (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 22:45:33 -0500
Maybe is just me, but I am at a HUGE disadvantage (being too far west in Ontario) when it comes to running Europe in most any DX contest. Yes - I got beat fair and square in the NAQP by a better oper
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-01/msg00066.html (12,750 bytes)

94. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ mag (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 23:05:08 -0500
Still waiting for mine :-( Tom - VE3CX _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-01/msg00070.html (11,336 bytes)

95. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 06:26:48 -0500
With single op rules, you are allowed ONE signal on the air at a time. You can do a "dualing CQ" where you call CQ on band A, stop transmitting, call CQ on band B, stop transmitting,then go back to c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-02/msg00219.html (8,837 bytes)

96. [CQ-Contest] Ontario QSO Party One Month Away (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 22:05:57 -0400
Hello Contesters Mark the weekend of April 19/20. Contest Club Ontario invites all Amateurs to work as many VE3/VA3's as possible in the 50 Counties, Cities and Districts that subdivide the province
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-03/msg00189.html (7,437 bytes)

97. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO1R vs.: SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 17:42:35 -0500
I do get it. How can one radio compete against two? How can a guy with one or two towers compete against a guy with 10. How can two guys with two radios (M2) compete against a shorthanded MM station
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00039.html (11,823 bytes)

98. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO1R vs.: SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 21:38:36 -0500
If he ain't having fun, he is definitely in the wrong class!! Tom - VE3CX _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00048.html (9,609 bytes)

99. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Insanity of Cut Numbers in Serial Number Contests (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 17:47:16 -0500
I hope you at least try and give them chance to send non-cut numbers to complete the QSO. To give another station a NIL is not going to teach them much when they get the UBN report a year later, with
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00245.html (10,119 bytes)

100. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Insanity of Cut Numbers in Serial Number Contests (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 07:01:49 -0500
which I still don't get a number. Can't ask for anything more :-) Tom - VE3CX _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contestin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00257.html (8,948 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu