Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ki9a@aol.com: 182 ]

Total 182 documents matching your query.

141. [CQ-Contest] assisted bug cured (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 12:34:42 EST
Obviously, 10.67 has issues with the assisted drop down, I downloaded 10.68, and it is cured! 73-Chuck KI9A **One site has it all. Your email accounts, your social networks, and the things you love.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00439.html (7,063 bytes)

142. Re: [CQ-Contest] Malicious Interference during SS (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 06:23:51 EST
Absolutely. Most of the fun, is the chase! 73- Chuck KI9A In a message dated 12/4/2008 8:18:49 P.M. Central Standard Time, kzerohb@gmail.com writes: Such a rule would destroy SweepStakes. 73, de Hans
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00132.html (8,117 bytes)

143. [CQ-Contest] I've heard it all now! (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 16:45:47 EST
Last night, my Dad, AD9P, was on 75 SSB checking out his new Pro3 on phone, and got into a ragchew with a, umm, pigfarmer ( yeah, not a "real" pigfarmer..), and when he was about to sign with him, he
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00224.html (7,204 bytes)

144. Re: [CQ-Contest] I've heard it all now! (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 15:25:52 EST
No, I am laughing. Who's site is this? It obviously is an anti-contester, with a very small mind, judging by the little man pissing. I know at LEAST two of the call on the "wall of shame". They are l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00264.html (8,880 bytes)

145. Re: [CQ-Contest] self help during contest (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 21:41:48 EST
I agree with Hans. Hands down. The Q is made, and anything after that is, in my opinion, wrong. But, now having said that, what about the old days--when you sat all Monday evening, doing dupe sheets.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00272.html (11,759 bytes)

146. Re: [CQ-Contest] Signal report (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 22:01:53 EST
Wow, is he a ham also? Copying contest speed code for 10 year old is outstanding!! 73- Chuck KI9A In a message dated 12/10/2008 8:59:56 P.M. Central Standard Time, alorona@sbcglobal.net writes: few c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00326.html (7,496 bytes)

147. Re: [CQ-Contest] Signal report (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 06:49:34 EST
So, when I have my rf gain cranked up, and filters in, with a ton of qrm around, how exactly do you propose I determine what a true signal report is?? What if my rig has a non-functioning S meter? Ca
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00329.html (7,887 bytes)

148. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL 10 (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 17:36:48 EST
Um, no. there is no one single time, or single freq, or single station asking for a sked. Local/regional clubs normally have a club activity time. 73- Chuck KI9A In a message dated 12/12/2008 4:35:06
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00383.html (9,236 bytes)

149. [TowerTalk] Yaesu G-450A rotor troubles (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 12:10:27 EST
Gang I am on my 2nd Yaesu 450a rotor, in the past 4 years. The rotor is fine, the control box has issues. Here is what I see: Indicator seems to work fine, going from due south, clockwise, until it g
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-01/msg00123.html (7,321 bytes)

150. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW CW & 6Y1V Logs (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 06:47:15 EST
Maybe I am missing something here. A log is made available to contest sponsors, for sometimes, extreme examination, and contesters generally have no problem with that. But, when they are made public,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-01/msg00274.html (8,408 bytes)

151. Re: [CQ-Contest] And now for something completely different...... (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 21:48:51 EST
That's easy, Hans. Fore me, success is if I had FUN operating my wireless! 73- Chuck KI9A In a message dated 2/3/2009 8:05:30 P.M. Central Standard Time, kzerohb@gmail.com writes: What single factor
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00029.html (8,395 bytes)

152. Re: [CQ-Contest] No US DX Only - ARRL DX (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 22:13:00 EST
Dave, I noticed an unusual amount of stateside guys calling us this weekend. The annoying thing I found was this: -Out of a dozen or so guys that called me, I worked 2 of them. I ignored the rest bec
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00352.html (9,034 bytes)

153. Re: [CQ-Contest] Operating Ethics for Multi-Op contest Stations (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 21:44:25 EDT
I've had SSTV'ers try to run me from any freq within 10 KHZ of 14.230. I really doubt, knowing the claiber of ops down there last week, that they would stay within a couple Kc of 14.230. I think 14.2
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00170.html (12,553 bytes)

154. Re: [CQ-Contest] arrl dx ssb spotting report (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 13:22:33 EDT
Wow, Ed, do you really think one guy ( or heck, even a bunch of guys) cheerleading, would result in a win? Spotting can be effective, but, for a loud contest station, that really isn't a rare mult, I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00278.html (9,544 bytes)

155. [CQ-Contest] Writelog still in business?? (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 19:35:04 EDT
Guys, I have a local guy, KC9IXO, who is a newer ham, and really interested in contesting, that ordered, and paid for writelog over 3 weeks ago, and has not received it yet. He contacted them and the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-05/msg00016.html (7,630 bytes)

156. [CQ-Contest] WL issue solved! (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 19:07:20 EDT
Thanks to Mr. Ron for getting things righted. Appears there was a breakdown on KC9IXO's end. 73- Chuck **The Average US Credit Score is 692. See Yours in Just 2 Easy Steps! (http://pr.atwola.com/prom
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-05/msg00025.html (6,703 bytes)

157. Re: [CQ-Contest] 59(9) all the time! (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:00:32 EDT
What if I had my gain up, and could not tell the signal? Or, what if I were using a homebrew rig, or if my S-meter was not working?? Not deceptive at all! 73- Chuck KI9A In a message dated 6/23/2009
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00368.html (9,038 bytes)

158. [CQ-Contest] MFJ SO2R (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 21:49:50 EDT
Gang Anyone use one? Looking the non-computer controlled unit, seems that $139 is an OK deal. _http://www.mfjenterprises.com/Product.php?productid=MFJ-643_ (http://www.mfjenterprises.com/Product.php?
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-07/msg00076.html (7,183 bytes)

159. [CQ-Contest] Why the 10 min rule anyway? (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 20:04:51 EDT
Excuse my ignorance, and, not condoning the recent DQ's. But, what is the idea behind the 10 min rule for M/S, anyway? It's still a single transmitter, just multiple operators. What makes this any di
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-07/msg00282.html (7,033 bytes)

160. Re: [CQ-Contest] 10 minute rule explained (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:50:09 EDT
Thanks for the reply, Tree. It clears it up, just a little. I understand the idea about the multi transmitter, but, isn't the category MULTI OP, SINGLE TRANSMITTER anyway? Still not sure how a 10 min
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-07/msg00305.html (9,681 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu