Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:kr2q@optimum.net: 353 ]

Total 353 documents matching your query.

61. [CQ-Contest] no K5D in ARRL? Then who did I work? (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:23:04 +0000 (GMT)
Hmmm. On day 2 on 40m (near the end), there was a K5D qrv. In fact, he was right on top of SV1 (who I still needed). When I figured out it was K5D, I turned the antenna south and he came up real loud
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00357.html (6,842 bytes)

62. [CQ-Contest] K5D in ARRL CW = it WAS them (real) (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:02:43 +0000 (GMT)
Someone pointed me to their web page where you can do a log lookup. I am in the log on the right day, band, etc., so it must have been them. Almost thought that I had lost a mult. Whew! :-) de Doug K
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00360.html (7,083 bytes)

63. [CQ-Contest] public accusation of cheating (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:10:57 +0000 (GMT)
I agree, but..... I have carefully scanned the original post and the word "cheat," or any deriviative of that word, is not present. If "cheating" is somehow brought up, it is by reader inference only
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00436.html (7,213 bytes)

64. [CQ-Contest] Putting the spoon into the pot: WPX - who is on first? (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 23:36:58 +0000 (GMT)
Just got my March 2009 CQ mag with the cw WPX results. YIPPIE!! I won a trophy!! BUT WAIT A MINUTE.....what's this I see? TI5N wins for the world (congrats) and get the WORLD trophy. I win for USA, b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00455.html (8,372 bytes)

65. Re: [CQ-Contest] Putting the spoon into the pot: WPX - who is on first? (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 13:42:19 +0000 (GMT)
[snip] When I was TDS Rallying, there were trophies for the top three places in most categories. Maybe it's time to consider something like this for major contests? [end snip] This is a GREAT idea. I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00028.html (8,777 bytes)

66. [CQ-Contest] Awards: no more wood? (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 00:41:43 +0000 (GMT)
Someone said that plaques are heavy, expensive to ship, take a long time, etc. He is right! And you can't "show them off" unless someone stops by your QTH. How about cashing in your old wooden plaque
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00053.html (8,349 bytes)

67. [CQ-Contest] Russian DX Contest Log Checking (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:37:10 +0000 (GMT)
This is very interesting, especially the "busted" numbers. As Randy says, most are 1 digit off (1 too high or too low). Randy further says he is going to slow down (both modes?). I have to wonder...a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00138.html (8,826 bytes)

68. [CQ-Contest] Is there nothing new under the sun? (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:31:30 +0000 (GMT)
Spotting reports Cut Numbers Open Logs High Speed CW Some of us like spotting reports, some of us don't. Some of us like cut numbers, some of us don't. Some of us like open logs, some of us don't. So
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00234.html (7,057 bytes)

69. [CQ-Contest] "It's not written into the rules now" (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 15:47:13 +0000 (GMT)
But it IS written into the rules for at least CQWW: http://www.cqww.com/2008_rules_cqww.pdf Found at least four times in the above document: "Selfspotting or asking to be spotted is not allowed." I a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00270.html (7,345 bytes)

70. [CQ-Contest] WPX M/S "one transmitter" (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 10:56:51 +0000 (GMT)
Tonno raised an interesting point about "one transmitter" versus "one signal." Personally, I think the "one transmitter" concept if ideal for M/S (and not "one signal"). The concept of "one signal,"
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00303.html (8,875 bytes)

71. [CQ-Contest] WPX rules from the past (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:46:38 +0000 (GMT)
Not to be too picky, but.... Before BJQ, weren't the rules: 1. maximum of 30 hours of operations 2. minimum of 30 minutes per off time ????? If you start the contest (today) 11.5 hours after the star
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00330.html (8,036 bytes)

72. [CQ-Contest] WPX 2008 CW plaque arrives today (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2009 17:38:38 +0000 (GMT)
Yippie! Thanks Dale, thanks Randy, thanks Doug de Doug KR2Q _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00115.html (6,360 bytes)

73. [CQ-Contest] staying awake (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 10:58:19 +0000 (GMT)
I just love anecdotal evidence (oxymoron?). I think being able to stay awake is mostly a function of band conditions and determination. When either is "high/good," it is much easier to stay awake. Wh
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-05/msg00214.html (7,121 bytes)

74. [CQ-Contest] S+P rates: apples vs oranges? (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 20:39:27 +0000 (GMT)
Stop the music! I think the posted comments are referring to two separate "rates." One is "pure" S+P (no SO2R) rate. The other is S+P rate on the 2nd radio while running on the first. Randy's comment
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00027.html (7,601 bytes)

75. [CQ-Contest] 7040 as lower limit (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 16:12:38 +0000 (GMT)
Sounds reasonable to me. So which EU countries have definitively documented that the lower limit on 40m is 7040? de Doug _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00057.html (6,304 bytes)

76. [CQ-Contest] Sprint: you've come a long way (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 18:47:52 +0000 (GMT)
I happened to run into this today. http://search.contesting.com/archives//html/3830/1996-12/msg00115.html Amazing. And Congrats again Dick! :-) de Doug KR2Q __________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00059.html (6,613 bytes)

77. [CQ-Contest] Band Plan (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2009 15:24:41 +0000 (GMT)
If that were the rule, yes. I have received several direct replies from EU indicating that while the Band Plan may say 7040, their individual country RULES do not impose any such limit. Your premise
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00094.html (7,103 bytes)

78. [CQ-Contest] License (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2009 15:35:01 +0000 (GMT)
Well, my information may be stale, but it was my impression that if your [DX] country does not have a reciprocal licensing agreement here (and maybe that you have received permission to operate "here
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00095.html (8,848 bytes)

79. [CQ-Contest] Borrowing Callsign/Control Operator (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 21:48:45 +0000 (GMT)
First, look at things in context. §97.103 Station licensee responsibilities. (a) The station licensee is responsible for the proper operation of the station in accordance with the FCC Rules. When the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00129.html (8,112 bytes)

80. [CQ-Contest] control ops - the final word? (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:06:44 +0000 (GMT)
Well, realizing that I am far from the expert on this stuff, I wrote to the ARRL today. Here is their reply, which I found enlightening, at least in terms of USA rules/regs. [snip] Hi Doug: For start
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00141.html (9,393 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu