Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ku7y.cw@gmail.com: 81 ]

Total 81 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Calling Disease... (score: 1)
Author: KU7Y <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 12:57:21 -0700
I remember years ago, in a state I used to live in, we had a DX "club". One of the things we did was award a "Lid of the Year" trophy to whoever we thought was the very worst operator when calling in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00465.html (11,639 bytes)

42. Re: [CQ-Contest] dit dit dit (score: 1)
Author: KU7Y <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 15:53:39 -0700
If the idea behind a contest is to test our skills, then why do the exchanges contain data that we can predict so easily? RST, SPC, Zones, even serial numbers are not much of a test. After all, you c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-12/msg00093.html (10,027 bytes)

43. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted or not assisted question (score: 1)
Author: KU7Y <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 11:40:13 -0600
Something else to think about is how important all the "casual" operators are to the big scores the "contest" stations make. One of the things that many less skilled CW operators do is use a CW decod
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00085.html (10,213 bytes)

44. Re: [CQ-Contest] DC and NAQP (score: 1)
Author: KU7Y <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 19:27:17 -0600
Interesting thought Jim, I think I'll file this under the "Be careful of what you ask for, you just might get it" folder..... :-) OK, back in my hole, Ron, KU7Y SOWP 5545M Arizona Outlaws Contest Clu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00193.html (9,785 bytes)

45. Re: [CQ-Contest] Reverse Beacon Network News - hopefullyofgeneralinterest (score: 1)
Author: KU7Y <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 04:55:28 -0600
As someone who is QRP CW most of the time, I have learned to Listen, Listen and then Listen some more when I hear a pile up. I remember that one of the first big lessons I learned was from listening
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00221.html (12,055 bytes)

46. Re: [CQ-Contest] Suggestions (score: 1)
Author: KU7Y <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 19:55:10 -0600
I agree with Hans, There really is a difference between SO and SO Assisted! Nothing wrong with either one but the fact that someone can cheat isn't a good reason to lump them all together. OK, back i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-09/msg00164.html (8,561 bytes)

47. Re: [CQ-Contest] Non-assisted & Assisted (score: 1)
Author: KU7Y <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 11:47:45 -0800
So far what I am seeing are thoughts from people who tend to score high. But think about this..... without all the little stations who are just getting their feet wet in contests, all the high scorin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-01/msg00337.html (10,216 bytes)

48. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Cheating in ARRL using the cluster (score: 1)
Author: KU7Y <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 13:37:33 -0800
I just checked my RBN spots and noticed the same thing. I only tried running once with not takers, all the rest was S&P but was spotted when calling other stations. I seldom use the RBN during a cont
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00340.html (11,834 bytes)

49. Re: [CQ-Contest] Single Op/Get Scores Assisted (score: 1)
Author: KU7Y <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 05:41:29 -0800
Seems to me that maybe what's needed is a rule that prohibits a SO Unassisted from having any internet connection. After all, if you are in a contest as SO Unassisted, what the heck do you need the i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00561.html (16,028 bytes)

50. Re: [CQ-Contest] SDR Generation (score: 1)
Author: KU7Y <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 17:51:46 -0700
Al makes some good points. One is this idea that everyone should be considered as SO2R. I have no idea where this came from. Sure, I tried a couple of contests with 2 rigs and did not like it. Turned
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00543.html (11,022 bytes)

51. Re: [CQ-Contest] How many hours do SOAB entrants actually operate? (score: 1)
Author: KU7Y <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 17:09:08 -0700
Why not have 2, twenty-four hour periods.... you can chose which one to enter, first 24 or second 24. I wonder if this might give people a reason to be working hard for all of the slow period on Sund
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-04/msg00071.html (11,204 bytes)

52. Re: [CQ-Contest] When is speed not speedy? (score: 1)
Author: KU7Y <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 12:57:35 -0700
Show some gratitude and slow down, guys. I spend a good bit of time on a couple of QRP email lists. There are many folks there that are both new to ham radio and to contesting. One of the things that
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-05/msg00419.html (10,177 bytes)

53. [CQ-Contest] Yaesu G-450 Rotor question (score: 1)
Author: KU7Y <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 18:51:14 -0700
I have been given a G-450 rotor that has a problem. The indicator needle acts like it has a mind of it's own! Sometimes it track the rotor, for several degrees and then stop. Sometimes it will just s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00198.html (8,222 bytes)

54. Re: [CQ-Contest] Reverse beacon of my own call? (score: 1)
Author: KU7Y <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 21:02:33 -0700
I did a contest awhile back as Assisted just to watch the spots on the RBN of my call. This gave me a good idea of when/where I was being heard and a guess as to how loud I might be. There were no si
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-07/msg00240.html (10,032 bytes)

55. Re: [CQ-Contest] Automation = lost essential skills (score: 1)
Author: KU7Y <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 19:04:35 -0800
Hi Mike, Well, just wait until your tired old mind only hears {YourCall} ENN21 and then nothing more!!! I have a sign in the bathroom that says, "Of all the things I've lost, I miss my mind the most"
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00223.html (10,845 bytes)

56. Re: [CQ-Contest] WHY - and other observed behavior (score: 1)
Author: KU7Y <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 14:22:54 -0800
I agree with what Doug, KR2Q said about speed. I'll send at whatever speed the DX station is using up to a point.... My little QRP signal is seldom as loud as most of the others in the "pack". And yo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00259.html (8,889 bytes)

57. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sending Call getting worse? (score: 1)
Author: KU7Y <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 09:16:10 -0800
I think the simple cure is to require the call sign to be part of the exchange. That should also be easy to enforce. OK, back in my hole, Ron, KU7Y CWOps #1211 Northern California Contest Club Arizon
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00286.html (8,061 bytes)

58. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO (A) in ARRL 10/160 (score: 1)
Author: KU7Y <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 16:11:58 -0800
I also believe that having a good range of categories is a good thing. Many people, as they get started in this game of contesting wind up getting a certificate for their category and are very proud
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00368.html (8,974 bytes)

59. Re: [CQ-Contest] Increasing contest participation (score: 1)
Author: KU7Y <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 14:25:09 -0800
Power level too. I keep track of my QRP contacts! OK, back in my hole, Ron, KU7Y CWOps #1211 Northern California Contest Club Arizona Outlaws Contest Club Silver Springs, NV ku7y@qsl.net http://www.h
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-12/msg00114.html (14,158 bytes)

60. [CQ-Contest] UTC clock needed (score: 1)
Author: "Ron, KU7Y" <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 21:08:33 -0800
Hi All, Just getting my old computer back up and running after a major crash. One of the things I lost was a good little UTC clock. (I also lost all my emails, so I can't go back and search for it!)
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-01/msg00109.html (7,460 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu