- 1. [CQ-Contest] Marketing the CQ (score: 1)
- Author: luther@mail.mdt.net.au (Martin Luther)
- Date: Sat Jan 5 01:33:34 2002
- Comments on selling via the CQ reminded me of something from a few years ago. In ARRL test I was still short of delaware. I made a CQ like.... "CQ CQ VK4VU especially looking for delaware which this
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00044.html (9,449 bytes)
- 2. [CQ-Contest] Contest Reporting (score: 1)
- Author: luther@mail.mdt.net.au (Martin Luther)
- Date: Sun Jan 13 00:45:48 2002
- Rod, Hi, you were "dropped in" as the person for us DX members of ARRL to contact. (K1KI was the culprit HiHi) I do fully understand the cost pressures that exist with magazines. Here at the WIA we f
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00260.html (8,072 bytes)
- 3. [CQ-Contest] Little Gun Dilemma: Callsign not acknowledged (score: 1)
- Author: luther@mail.mdt.net.au (Martin Luther)
- Date: Wed Feb 20 01:31:17 2002
- Hi Clive, If we are to delete from our logs people who do not operate the way I think they should under my view of the world. Then my scores are going to diminish considerably!!! Can I recommend a ni
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-02/msg00287.html (10,166 bytes)
- 4. [CQ-Contest] Little Gun Dilemma: Callsign not acknowledged (score: 1)
- Author: luther@mail.mdt.net.au (Martin Luther)
- Date: Wed Feb 20 01:31:13 2002
- Bill, It is easy to work out what to do if you look at each persons responsibility in the exchange and who will be penalised for any errors. Lets assume I am running stations. You call me and I send
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-02/msg00288.html (14,850 bytes)
- 5. [CQ-Contest] /QRP (score: 1)
- Author: luther@mail.mdt.net.au (Martin Luther)
- Date: Mon Mar 25 23:57:51 2002
- One thing that I find a number of times is I copy ???@@@^RP. Sort of like the end of a long call. So I try the RP go ahead. No response. QRZ.!... &**%%%$$$#QRP. Aha think I, "the QRP go ahead". SHHHH
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00471.html (7,525 bytes)
- 6. [CQ-Contest] Last 2 (score: 1)
- Author: luther@mail.mdt.net.au (Martin Luther)
- Date: Thu Mar 30 06:32:33 2000
- I couldn't agree more.This is the one most frustrating experiences that I get regularly in pile ups. Xfgv tk gbhj co n TK your 5930 Thanks 5904 TK what's your call vk5gn (Says Sorry and gives call)
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-03/msg00302.html (7,965 bytes)
- 7. [CQ-Contest] Doubts on the WPX Contest (score: 1)
- Author: luther@mail.mdt.net.au (Martin Luther)
- Date: Tue Apr 4 01:39:16 2000
- There used to be an important strategy element in WPX, at least for single ops. Choosing the right time to be on the band. That was when it was 30 hours out of 48. Most ops would have to give up good
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-04/msg00016.html (8,860 bytes)
- 8. [CQ-Contest] Readability of signals (score: 1)
- Author: luther@mail.mdt.net.au (Martin Luther)
- Date: Thu Dec 16 00:02:13 1999
- Recent posts have raised the issue of good readable signals. I think this is becoming a neglected art. In the last few contests there have been a number of signals that have poor audio. That doesn't
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-12/msg00148.html (8,301 bytes)
- 9. [CQ-Contest] Low Bands operating skills (longish) (score: 1)
- Author: luther@mail.mdt.net.au (Martin Luther)
- Date: Tue Oct 29 01:49:34 2002
- Following CQWW Phone I have a few ideas and suggestions. This is not for the rate kings/queens on the equatorial islands but for those of us struggling with more normal locations! There are clearly s
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-10/msg00213.html (10,278 bytes)
- 10. [CQ-Contest] CQWW and Signal Reports (score: 1)
- Author: luther@mail.mdt.net.au (Martin Luther)
- Date: Tue Oct 29 01:49:39 2002
- Is it time to do away with RS(T) in CQWW, or is it already optional? 73, Paul EI5DI No, I disagree, Paul, I had a few like you doing the same thing. I needed repeats on about half of them. Apart from
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-10/msg00214.html (8,673 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu