CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] Little Gun Dilemma: Callsign not acknowledged

Subject: [CQ-Contest] Little Gun Dilemma: Callsign not acknowledged
From: luther@mail.mdt.net.au (Martin Luther)
Date: Wed Feb 20 01:31:17 2002

Hi Clive,
If we are to delete from our logs people who do not operate the way I think
they should under my view of the world. Then my scores are going to diminish
considerably!!!

Can I recommend a nice bottle of Barossa Red wine....Jacobs Creek is
consistent but a Wolf Blass vintage label will really make things like
contests seem less important. Hi Hi


73

Martin VK5GN



-----Original Message-----
From:   owner-cq-contest@contesting.com
[mailto:owner-cq-contest@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Clive Whelan
Sent:   Tuesday, 19 February, 2002 19:33
To:     cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject:        Re: [CQ-Contest] Little Gun Dilemma: Callsign not acknowledged


NG3K wrote


> At step 4, my personal preference is:
>
> 4  me: big0gun r ng3k 599 md
>



I think you * should*, and I always *do* send

4. de ng3k ng3k tu 599 md  ( I do think the de is important as a
delimiter here)


If big0gun sends anything else but ng3k tu......., don't log
him, it's his own fault and he deserves a NIL.


Thanks for the Q from GW7X ( not a big gun!), you were not
strong, but quite readable.


73


Clive
GW3NJW
gw3njw@gw7x.org
Contest Cambria-http://www.gw7x.org


--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com


--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>