Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:mclarson@rcc.com: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB. Mathematics (score: 1)
Author: "Michael J. Clarson" <mclarson@rcc.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 11:10:30 -0400
Steve: Repeating a call back, to me is key to knowing the exchange was successful. Numerous times, on ssb, I call a "high-rate" station, we go back and forth a few times, and each time he gets my cal
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00060.html (11,320 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Rules and the District of Columbia - TimeForAction! (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Clarson" <mclarson@rcc.com>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 14:13:29 -0400
Other NA countries: two come to mind-- St Pierre and Bermuda. What about 4u1un?--Mike, WV2ZOW --Original Message-- The NAQP rules state: "Multipliers: Are U.S. states (including KH6 and KL7), 13 Cana
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00415.html (10,000 bytes)

3. RE: [CQ-Contest] Voice Automation Enhancements and the future (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Clarson" <mclarson@rcc.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 12:16:40 -0500
Please--don't misunderstand. I am not trying to start a phone vs. CW thing. Just trying to envision what is coming and where we are going. I am not anti-progress. I don't miss recopying logs and usin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00401.html (8,730 bytes)

4. RE: [CQ-Contest] RE: Here we go again (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Clarson" <mclarson@rcc.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 01:11:39 -0500
Hey--no jabs at construction articles--they are 'webbing' those too--look at that 1296 amp in the latest issue--all the construction details are on the web, the article is just a fluff piece. --Mike,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00069.html (9,124 bytes)

5. RE: [CQ-Contest] Line Scores (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Clarson" <mclarson@rcc.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 13:34:40 -0500
So all the scores get published for field day so the picknickers can not look at them? Not publish scores for events where all the people care about is the scores? Dosn't make sense. And the VHF cont
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00195.html (10,047 bytes)

6. RE: [CQ-Contest] QST Construction Articles (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Clarson" <mclarson@rcc.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 14:15:01 -0500
Ward: Point taken. Half an article is better than no article! But the WEB based stuff is SO disposable. How often have you bookmarked the greatest web site ever, only to find it gone next time you we
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00196.html (9,081 bytes)

7. RE: [CQ-Contest] scores - final thought (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Clarson" <mclarson@rcc.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 11:28:18 -0500
AND, with the proper filters, you can skip all the ads too!--Mike, WV2ZOW --Original Message-- From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of asciibaro
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00229.html (8,909 bytes)

8. RE: [CQ-Contest] Signing /QRP In Contests (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Clarson" <mclarson@rcc.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 03:11:24 -0500
I remember an old friend, Jim, K2OJL (SK), who used to go off on a rant everytime he worked someone signing QRP. He'd go on and on on how HE should get the extra points because he is the one doing al
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00331.html (11,753 bytes)

9. RE: [CQ-Contest] ARRL 10m prediction (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Clarson" <mclarson@rcc.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 11:32:38 -0500
I understand Steve's pain. With my call, WV2ZOW, on phone, when running low power and being "arielly" challenged, many of the high QSO rate guys will give me one or two tries, and, I get the sense th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00476.html (10,291 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Mode Specificity [was: WW SSB] (score: 1)
Author: "Michael J. Clarson" <mclarson@rcc.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 12:50:23 -0500
David: "Let you use" is a lot different from mode not being a factor. Separate categories for CW and Phone, different contact values certainly makes mode a factor. In VHF contests, if I am having tro
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00187.html (9,419 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] X-land QSO Parties? (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Clarson" <mclarson@rcc.com>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 11:38:57 -0400
Then there is the Mid Atlantic QSO party which picks up all of 2 and 3, with WV and VA for some of 4 and 8. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesti
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-05/msg00152.html (8,202 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX Report (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Clarson" <mclarson@rcc.com>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 18:31:44 -0400
Mal: I think the issue is 2X1 calls do not stand out. Also, with the proliferation of vanity calls and special DX calls, Prefix multipliers are not that hard to get, and certainly not waiting through
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-05/msg00237.html (9,233 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting Extinction (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Clarson" <mclarson@rcc.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 12:08:27 -0400
Ev: I Note you are typing this while the 432 mHz Sprint is happening. Your analysis is a bit flawed. The decline in VHF logs comes from 100% of the ham population, not just the technicians. My though
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00064.html (10,406 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS SSB And Your Callsign In The Exchange (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Clarson" <mclarson@rcc.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:54:23 -0500
What a spirited discussion! Its clear that SS is a different kind of contest, just as a Drag race is different than a Road Rally is different than a race like the Indy 500. It's also clear that the s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00349.html (10,350 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu