CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [CQ-Contest] RE: Here we go again

To: "'Tom Osborne'" <w7why@charter.net>,"'CQ Contest'" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: RE: [CQ-Contest] RE: Here we go again
From: "Mike Clarson" <mclarson@rcc.com>
Reply-to: mclarson@rcc.com
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 01:11:39 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Hey--no jabs at construction articles--they are 'webbing' those too--look at
that 1296 amp in the latest issue--all the construction details are on the
web, the article is just a fluff piece. --Mike, WV2ZOW

-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of Tom Osborne
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 11:54 PM
To: CQ Contest
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] RE: Here we go again


W2RU wrote (among other things):

>Quite frankly, if space is *truly* an issue, and it has to be one or
the >other, I'd rather have the line scores than text that duplicates
the >tabular Top 10 listings.

_________________________________________________

Or another article about how to build a 2000 Ghz transverter!

Tom W7WHY

__

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>