Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:nt5c@texas.net: 59 ]

Total 59 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Radio Choice (score: 1)
Author: nt5c@texas.net (John Warren)
Date: Wed Sep 4 10:27:54 2002
I use the FT1000MP, and it's a fine rig. But in terms of raw SSB receiving sensitivity it's a negligible improvement over my old faithful 940. All sorts of superior bells and whistles, many of which
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-09/msg00045.html (7,115 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] Re: FT1000MP setting (score: 1)
Author: nt5c@texas.net (John Warren)
Date: Fri Sep 6 23:00:52 2002
That's correct. It's menu item 8-4, and you need the "Tuned" condition. John, NT5C.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-09/msg00072.html (7,459 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] Re: ARRL Contest Coverage (score: 1)
Author: nt5c@texas.net (John Warren)
Date: Wed Jan 9 17:55:14 2002
Mark, Thank you for a reasoned presentation about QST plans. However, I would suggest the following. ARRL, through QST, should be the LEADER in amateur radio. I believe that serious contesters, serio
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00143.html (9,368 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] Re: QST vs. NCJ vs. CQ (score: 1)
Author: nt5c@texas.net (John Warren)
Date: Sun Jan 13 10:40:52 2002
...and the WAZ/5BWAZ standings. John, NT5C. -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com I presume that CQ Magazine (being
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00278.html (8,203 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] Re: Dayton Reservations (score: 1)
Author: nt5c@texas.net (John Warren)
Date: Mon Jan 14 08:16:03 2002
Pete N4ZR wrote (re Dayton): That's true. I got what they said was the next-to-last room at 7.48, after holding the 'phone line from 07:00:00! Where did all the rooms go? Are there "block booking" se
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00324.html (7,458 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] Re: Italian power explained (score: 1)
Author: nt5c@texas.net (John Warren)
Date: Sun Mar 10 15:58:02 2002
James 9V1YC introduced me to the term "Active Tuners" for these devices. John, NT5C.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00174.html (7,752 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] Re: More fun with spot statistics (score: 1)
Author: nt5c@texas.net (John Warren)
Date: Fri Mar 15 10:27:39 2002
Statistics are like a bikini: What they reveal is interesting, but what they conceal is vital. John, NT5C.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00299.html (7,040 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] Re: Rooms at Crowne Plaza, Dayton?? (score: 1)
Author: nt5c@texas.net (John Warren)
Date: Fri Mar 22 12:55:31 2002
There are several fishy things about the Dayton Crowne Plaza. Last year I had a confirmed room, in writing. Took the precaution of checking about five days in advance - it had gone - "no record"! My
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00386.html (7,867 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] FCC on CW (score: 1)
Author: John Warren <nt5c@texas.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 07:29:23 -0600
Absolutely no effect whatever. Irrelevant. They're not proposing a rule to limit you to 10wpm are they? John, NT5C. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00349.html (9,170 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] FCC on CW (score: 1)
Author: John Warren <nt5c@texas.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 08:35:24 -0600
Where in the world did you get that idea Art? Nothing could be further from the truth! The ARRL Board has emphasized that updated voluntary band planning by mode, well coordinated with amateurs world
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00373.html (8,560 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT1000MP (score: 1)
Author: John Warren <nt5c@texas.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 19:32:08 -0600
I agree with Igor about the FT1000MP on 10M. "No good" may be a bit strong, but I still keep my old TS940S just for long-path DXing on 10M, because its noise floor and sensitivity in quiet conditions
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00860.html (9,492 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] FCC on CW (score: 1)
Author: John Warren <nt5c@texas.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 07:29:23 -0600
Absolutely no effect whatever. Irrelevant. They're not proposing a rule to limit you to 10wpm are they? John, NT5C. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00938.html (9,170 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] FCC on CW (score: 1)
Author: John Warren <nt5c@texas.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 08:35:24 -0600
Where in the world did you get that idea Art? Nothing could be further from the truth! The ARRL Board has emphasized that updated voluntary band planning by mode, well coordinated with amateurs world
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00962.html (8,560 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] 2005 Dayton Forum Wrap Up (score: 1)
Author: John Warren <nt5c@texas.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 05:03:57 -0600
Tim, That worked out well for the enthusiasts, although some folks felt consolidation at Hara would still be better if possible, for the overall health of HamVention. From a selfish point of view, I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-06/msg00050.html (9,066 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] IRLP Contest (score: 1)
Author: John Warren <nt5c@texas.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 17:29:13 -0600
Craig, I'm sorry, but I don't see the connection between IRLP (pro or con) and your conclusion. In our internal club discussion (CTDXCC) we largely agree that IRLP isn't really ham radio "contesting"
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00272.html (9,969 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Contest Rules W/VE (score: 1)
Author: John Warren <nt5c@texas.net>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:44:20 -0500
Ed, It's because it's not "our" Region. It's IARU Region II, in which both Canada and the United States happen to be located. And IARU rules permit U.S. 'Phone operation 7000-7100, just like Canadian
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00083.html (8,036 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Canada versus USA (score: 1)
Author: John Warren <nt5c@texas.net>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 12:04:58 -0500
That's at least equally true in 40M SSB DXing, perhaps more so. A large number of U.S. stations hear all that rare stuff operating transceive below 7100 - and there are few Canadian DXers who seem to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00209.html (8,035 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dayton Forum Rooms, etc. (score: 1)
Author: John Warren <nt5c@texas.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 07:54:08 -0500
Dayton is far from perfect. The greatest irritation for me is that the major events are split between two sites - Hara Arena and the Crowne Plaza - which have very poor (in fact, worsening) transport
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00390.html (10,537 bytes)

19. [CQ-Contest] Re: 10 Meters (score: 1)
Author: John Warren <nt5c@texas.net>
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2004 16:43:28 -0600
In answer to Patrick Hoppe's question about 10M: Yes, it was open from Texas to W. Europe and N. Africa this morning (Sun). As usual on ten, if someone is there they can be quite loud. G7GNM, one of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00170.html (8,410 bytes)

20. [CQ-Contest] Re: 40M Band Plans (score: 1)
Author: John Warren <nt5c@texas.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 16:56:59 -0600
Rich K2WR wrote: As far as the band plan itself, I think it's a laudatory attempt to separate incompatible uses of shared spectrum. However, the (40M) band plan is not necessary practical in every in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-03/msg00136.html (9,496 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu